|Peer reviews having minimal or no feedback at all:
Welcome to the 41st edition of my talk page. Please leave me a message below and I will generally reply on your talk page. Although my email address is enabled, I do not check often (so I may be slow in replying to email and very much prefer to have conversations here). I am not around much, so it may take me a while to reply or respond to requests. Please note that while I will do a peer review on just about any article if asked, it will often take me a week or more, and I do not have the time to do copyedits. If you want me to review an article, please open a peer review on it first. Thanks for stopping by and happy editing! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- 1 You and I both get a photo credit here
- 2 Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
- 3 Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
- 4 A new user right for New Page Patrollers
- 5 Peer Reviews
- 6 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 7 Request Assistance
- 8 Veblenbot
- 9 Happy Saturnalia!
- 10 Merry Christmas
- 11 Merry Christmas
- 12 Merry, merry!
- 13 Forgot to give YOU your New Years' hug,, and... need help
- 14 Robert Falcon Scott and related articles
- 15 Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
- 16 Administrators' newsletter – March 2017
- 17 Thanks
- 18 Wikipedia:Narrative flow
- 19 Administrators' newsletter – April 2017
- 20 Administrators' newsletter – May 2017
- 21 Article of concern
You and I both get a photo credit here
The state rail plan appears to have both of us represented. My photo of the Suburban Station facade is on 30 while the very last page (168) is a photo of yours. Mitch32(The ripest peach is highest on the tree.) 05:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Congrats and cool - thanks so much for letting me know. I keep track of places that use my photos and will add this. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
Heyo. Was directed to ask you about the bots updating the Peer Review page. Archived some of the PRs there and they don't seem to be removed from there yet. Is the bot down or something? GamerPro64 22:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. VeblenBot has not run since November 4 and I am not sure what the problem is. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 13:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hi Ruhrfisch, I remember you helped out with some German-language issues at rhodocene many years ago, and I am wondering if you can offer some help with the article aluminium sulfacetate which I have recently created. This source from 1899 speaks of its use as a mordant being abandoned and about production of an "empyreumatic liquid." My DYK nomination uses this fact for the hook and the translation has been questioned. Would you be able to look at the German version of the text and comment? Happy to change the article and hook if I have misrepresented the source, obviously. Many Thanks. EdChem (talk) 21:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ruhrfisch, sorry to bother you on Thanksgiving, ignore this until you're back, but I just wanted to make sure you had heard that Veblenbot has been down since Nov 2 (see User talk:CBM#VeblenBot down?). In particular, WP:FACL stops at November 2. Best of the season to you and yours. - Dank (push to talk) 16:13, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Dank, I am not able to maintian the bot anymore - there is a discussion at Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#User:VeblenBot about this. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
|Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC)|
- Merry Christmas to you, too. Gerry D (talk) 21:04, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Merry Christmas! Always pleased to hear from you. Choess (talk) 01:20, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Forgot to give YOU your New Years' hug,, and... need help
Again. My brain is still buzzed by 3 operations in 4 months so I'm wobbly esp in the memory (and judgement) departments here. I'm trying to ease back in the en.WP but have been met with some stiff opposition from the newest editors, that Commomzmostly.. I'm sure I make mistakes, but they are good faith edits. They only rollback them usually without not leaving any edit summary. I am considering discontinuing working on the wikis. These others have make this a formidable place-- amd I am a team player! So- you may recall that I NEVER wanted to be am Admim, since I despise confrontation. Here is an example of his/her belief that its OK to place open lniks to [[NAMM] in the centers of articles.for example: Arthur Adams; the editor is User talk:Allisonhargis, and I hate to come to you about this! --Leahtwosaints
Various 37.230.x IPs (who seem all to be the same person) are grinding an axe here. In particular they are convinced anyone who doesn't like their edits is your sockpuppet (and that we/you are both a vandal and a "hacker"), which is why I'm bringing it to your attention. Pinkbeast (talk) 14:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
- NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
- Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).
- Amortias • Deckiller • BU Rob13
- Ronnotel • Islander • Chamal N • Isomorphic • Keeper76 • Lord Voldemort • Shereth • Bdesham • Pjacobi
- A recent RfC has redefined how articles on schools are evaluated at AfD. Specifically, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist.
- AfDs that receive little participation should now be closed like an expired proposed deletion, following a deletion process RfC.
- Defender, HakanIST, Matiia and Sjoerddebruin are our newest stewards, following the 2017 steward elections.
- The 2017 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Góngora, Krd, Lankiveil, Richwales and Vogone. They will serve for approximately 1 year.
- A recent query shows that only 16% of administrators on the English Wikipedia have enabled two-factor authentication. If you haven't already enabled it please consider doing so.
- Cookie blocks should be deployed to the English Wikipedia soon. This will extend the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user after they switch accounts under a new IP.
- A bot will now automatically place a protection template on protected pages when admins forget to do so.
...for your Signpost comment and acknowledgement of those heady days of PR when a group of us combined to make it such a powerful instrument for article improvement. You seriously understate your contribution and leadership in this endeavour. As my health slowly improves I am trying to take a bit more interest in some aspects of Wikipedia, and might soon be able to undertake the occasional review. My best wishes to you. Brianboulton (talk) 22:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Brian - I am overjoyed to hear your health is improving and to see your post here! Thanks for your kind words and wonderful to see you here, and all the best from me to you, as well. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 16:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
I have started an essay on the concept of narrative flow, a concept that I think is largely undervalued in the encyclopedia in general. I decided to search for discussions where editors had raised the concept, figuring that such editors might want to chime in on the meaning of the concept and I found a mention by you. Cheers! bd2412 T 02:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).
- Following a discussion on the backlog of unpatrolled files, consensus was found to create a new user right for autopatrolling file uploads. Implementation progress can be tracked on Phabricator.
- The BLPPROD grandfather clause, which stated that unreferenced biographies of living persons were only eligible for proposed deletion if they were created after March 18, 2010, has been removed following an RfC.
- An RfC has closed with consensus to allow proposed deletion of files. The implementation process is ongoing.
- After an unsuccessful proposal to automatically grant IP block exemption, consensus was found to relax the criteria for granting the user right from needing it to wanting it.
- After a recent RfC, moved pages will soon be featured in a queue similar to Special:NewPagesFeed and require patrolling. Moves by administrators, page movers, and autopatrolled editors will be automatically marked as patrolled.
- Cookie blocks have been deployed. This extends the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user if they switch accounts, even under a new IP.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).
- Karanacs • Berean Hunter • GoldenRing • Dlohcierekim
- Gdr • Tyrenius • JYolkowski • Longhair • Master Thief Garrett • Aaron Brenneman • Laser brain • JzG • Dragons flight
- An RfC has clarified that user categories should be emptied upon deletion, but redlinked user categories should not be removed if re-added by the user.
- Discussions are ongoing regarding proposed changes to the COI policy. Changes so far have included clarification that adding a link on a Wikipedia forum to a job posting is not a violation of the harassment policy.
- You can now see a list of all autoblocks at Special:AutoblockList.
- There is a new tool for adding archives to dead links. Administrators are able to restrict other user's ability to use the tool, and have additional permissions when changing URL and domain data.
- Administrators, bureaucrats and stewards can now set an expiry date when granting user rights. (discuss, permalink)
Article of concern
Hey Ruhr, long time. I hope youre well. Can you take a look at something I noticed while reading. Six-year itch seems iffy. Like it is made up. The list of elections attributed to it is at least suspect. I can eliminate several right off with only cursory research. I know this isnt your area but I haven't the time to do much here these days and this article concerned me because it has one source and it is almost false on its face. This article gives this topic way too much influence. You can email me if you still have my email. IvoShandor (talk) 03:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)