User talk:Rwxrwxrwx

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives[edit]

  1. March 2006 - October 2007
  2. October 2007 - December 2009
  3. December 2009 - November 2012
  4. November 2012 - February 2015

ok sorry[edit]

I won't spam it anymore. Can you guys unblock my link because my SEO has went down to shit

104.238.172.254 (talk) 00:53, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Conill[edit]

Hello,

Your DYK nomination has been approved except for one minor problem. Please remedy that, and I shall be delighted to pass this article as approved.

Georgejdorner (talk) 19:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ailladie-panorama.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ailladie-panorama.jpg, which you've attributed to "The author, a friend of mine, gave me permission". I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 15:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

  • I had already marked it for deletion myself, since I moved it to Commons. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 15:25, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Rwxrwxrwx. The same message also applies to File:Davesarcophagus.jpg. Since you did not take the photos, an OTRS ticket is required for each image. There's instructions available at WP:consent as to how to do this. The files have also been nominated for deletion on the Commons. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:31, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Conill[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:07, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Spanish Civil War, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Isthisuseful (talk) 22:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Celtic Media Festival (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Bangor, Falmouth, St Ives and Owen Edwards

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Gallery in Nelson's Pillar for March 23[edit]

HI there, you removed the full Gallery for Nelson's Pillar stating that wikipedia was NOT an Image Repository. However I ask can you make an exception for this! The reason being Nelson's Pillar no longer exists having been blown up. For educational Purposes and History lessons we feel it is important to see the images! We initially posted these images as part of a Project on Nelson's Pillar Dublin, and feel they are essential for understanding of Nelson's Pillar !

There are a lot of people and schools interested in our Photos of Nelson's Pillar and had hoped this wikipedia article was a great location to find them. We have no intention of posting any other images other than the Gallery Posted as of yesterday 22-March. So that is the Gallery completed !

Initially we had posted numerous photos for various other projects undertaken. The Photos we posted over the last year or so, were based on wikipedia's article requesting for Old Buildings and in particular Monuments!

Is there any way you can make an exception and keep in the Gallery? Any help appreciated. Kind Regards Foxhunter22

Hi @Foxhunter22:. It's true that Wikipedia is "not an image repository", not a photo album, not a scrapbook, it's an encyclopedia. If we make an exception for this, then why not every other article? It would make a mockery of the whole policy. Wikimedia Commons is specifically designed to hold collections of images, and if you click the Commons link at the bottom of the article in question, it will bring you to the Nelson's Pillar category, which contains every image of the thing that has ever been uploaded by anybody for use in all language versions of Wikipedia, and more quality uploads are welcome. I'm not familiar with the Wikipedia request for photos of monuments, but I think you'll find that it asks for the photos to be uploaded to Commons, and only the best few included in Wikipedia articles, in accordance with Wikipedia policies. Cheers. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 20:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi @Rwxrwxrwx:. Fair enough. We will abide by the rules !

It's just a pity you couldn't make an exception here. The reason stated above - lots of learning for School Children, Schools in General, and Professional people doing research on various Projects ongoing here in Dublin Ireland and in England. For a lot of Researchers etc seeing the Pillar and Monument itself is better than reading about it -to see it's scale and detail could only come from a Photo Gallery! Given the Pillar is long gone from Dublin since March 1966, that's 49 years ago this month.

The Monument section we saw a few months ago, is probably something to do with this http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org/ Well it's disappointing that's for sure for all of us here !! For instance we were planning to show the Thomas Kirk Statue of Nelson we posted with Birds Nest and British Flag draped over it in detail this Friday to various Interests on Projector using this wikipedia page! The Detail was exceptional !

Either way if you can't do anything for us and it contravenes Rules etc then we can only accept that! Thank you for replying to us! Kind Regards FoxHunter22

Rudeness[edit]

Was there any need to be so rude and use foul language like you did in this edit summary? I was courteous and civil in mine, so there was no need for your rudeness. Wes Mouse | T@lk 18:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

  • "Rude and foul"? That reaction seems a bit over the top; let's keep it light-hearted. Cheers. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 18:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Please close AfD[edit]

Close AfD before merge, by the way that AfD can not be closed now. I am correct here, you cannot merge an article in without consensus. Though Guy's close is controversial, if the AfD was not opened than the merge can be done since the 3rd AfD is the most recent discussion consensus must be reached. Valoem talk contrib 17:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

@Valoem: This is getting a bit silly. The merge debate was opened on 29 March, nearly 3 weeks ago, there had been huge input into it, and it was properly closed; the consensus was "merge". Just because somebody started a new AfD 3 days ago does not invalidate the merge debate; it invalidates the AfD which was premature, and should be closed now. I can't close it since I am not an admin, and I have taken sides on the issue. I notice an admin is now getting involved in it. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 20:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Take me to your leader (phrase), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trillian and Take Me to Your Leader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

However[edit]

First of all look at the edits, I didn't put anything in there. To say I need to learn punctuation and capitalization is dumb. If you want to make that change then fine, but to say I need to learn it when I didn't write is stupid.

Second read the sentence you seem to want to be there so badly "However, it isn't water resistant so don't submerge it in water." The words "so don't submerge it in water" are not encyclopedic and should probably be removed. Do you suggest we make the sentence just "However, it isn't water resistant." It doesn't make sense to be its own sentence. The proper way the sentence should be is "It has a water resistant coating which protects it from light water splash, however it isn't water resistant." It just flows better and grammatically makes more sense.

If you want to leave the submerge part in there in two sentences it still makes more sense without the word however. "It also has a water resistant coating which protects it from light water splash. It isn't water resistant so don't submerge it in water." - GalatzTalk 20:47, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

@Galatz: The existing version reads:
The second generation Moto E has a 4.5-inch qHD LCD screen, 1.2 GHz processor, 1GB RAM, storage of 8GB (out of which 5.47 GB is available to the user) with microSD card slot (supports expandable storage of up to 32GB), it also has a water resistant coating which protects it from light water splash. However, it isn't water resistant so don't submerge it in water. It is available in either 3G or 4G LTE.
You have been trying to change it to:
The second generation Moto E has a 4.5-inch qHD LCD screen, 1.2 GHz processor, 1GB RAM, storage of 8GB (out of which 5.47 GB is available to the user) with microSD card slot (supports expandable storage of up to 32GB), it also has a water resistant coating which protects it from light water splash however it isn't water resistant so don't submerge it in water it is available in either 3G or 4G LTE.
Simply getting rid of punctuation and capitals and destroying sentence structure in order to enforce some perceived "rule" about not starting a sentence with "However" is bizarre. First, there is no such rule; some just consider it better style in certain situations. Second, don't just destroy the text you object to; make some effort to improve it. I agree it's not encyclopaedic - make it encyclopaedic without wrecking it. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 21:11, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
I didnt "wreck" anything, I undid a change that I viewed as making something worse rather than better. You undid what I undid. To say I have been trying to "change it to" is completely inaccurate. I have been leaving it as it was. Very big difference. - GalatzTalk 21:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
@Galatz: That looks better now. For the record though, it was you who initiated the changes; I just reverted you. Cheers. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 21:56, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
And I just reverted someone else, they initiated it, not me, but whatever, as long as its set now. Thanks - GalatzTalk 01:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015[edit]

We do not have any ties to the company or product. However, we would like to be the contributors to the new product and have attached another source of reference. Please review. Thanks Vinopedia (talk) 11:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)vinopedia

Hello @Vinopedia:. This refers to your editing of the Corkscrew article to include a description of the "La Flute" product. The only independent reference you provided is a link to a review in "Bella Online", which publishes articles submitted by amateur writers,[1] and is hardly a reliable source. Searching the web, I could find no reliable sources, such as articles in trade journals, professional reviews by wine critics, etc. Probably every brand of corkscrew has been reviewed by somebody somewhere; that doesn't mean each one deserves a listing in this article, which is about corkscrews in general. Your user account is new, devoted only to publicising this product, and your claim of independence is not convincing. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 11:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Illumination Mac Guff.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Illumination Mac Guff.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 20:18, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

AIV[edit]

This is crazy, take this kind of thing to WP:ANI. Ghostwheel ʘ 00:01, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

I may be wrong, so I've checked here. Ghostwheel ʘ 00:06, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Rwxrwxrwx, that report looks like it took a while to assemble, thanks for trying to help. If someone is causing trouble with that many IP's, its probably too complicated for AIV, and would be better reported at ANI. I don't know why someone didn't just do that, but the ANI thread above went pear-shaped. I'd do it for you but I have no time. Also, I don't know how to rangeblock. If you want help, copy your AIV report to ANI, the next time you're online, and ask for an admin who can do rangeblocks to review, and block if appropriate. Thanks. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
    • p.s. the closer of the thread suggested WP:SPI or WP:LTA; don't follow that advice, it is incorrect. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:01, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
      • So I was right to begin with, why didn't you just say so in the first place FLQbeam? Ghostwheel ʘ 02:19, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about the 'crazy' comment, I should have phrased it more like Floquenbeam.... I'll do better next time. Glad you reported it, I was pretty dumb in my response. Ghostwheel ʘ 02:03, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

  • @Ghostwheel: @Floquenbeam: Thanks for the comments. As can be seen, there is nothing remotely new about this; it has been going on a long time. It has also had the attention of plenty of admins, who I think have accepted that there is no quick solution; just respond to each event as it happens, blocking and protecting as appropriate without over-the-top reactions, and of course WP:DFTT, until the offenders get tired of it. When I see it happening I just revert the edits, add the address to my list, and report at AIV, so that admins can see at a glance what the problem is, block/protect as they see fit without having to go through the whole 1-2-3-final warning tedium, then forget about it until the next time. I haven't heard any realistic ideas other than the current system for dealing with it (are we going to range-block all of Indonesia?), so I don't see ANI as a magic solution. However I will post the matter there and see if anything new appears. Cheers. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 08:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Update: I see it has been raised at ANI: WP:ANI#Vandal, so I can probably rest for the moment. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

I archived the ANI report for now. Let me know if the vandal starts up again and I'll help however I can - I've seen a couple of admins who do range blocks, we can ping them directly next time. Ghostwheel ʘ 20:43, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I think you really deserve this, GOOD JOB!!!! Ghostwheel ʘ 02:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lluís Llach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to El Periódico
Together for Yes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to El Periódico

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Galaxy Note 5[edit]

Hi! What this? Please read the article. Note 5 will be this month! --Nickispeaki (talk) 16:43, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

  • @Nickispeaki: That's all rumours, leaks, speculation. No announcement has been made. There might not even be a Note 5. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 16:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Ok. I'm waiting a month and write the article. ;-p. --Nickispeaki (talk) 20:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Samsung Galaxy Note 5 - month. --Nickispeaki (talk) 10:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

No! Even less - 15:02, 13 August 2015. Only 10 days! --Nickispeaki (talk) 11:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Requested Move[edit]

Hi there. FYI I've transcluded the requested move discussion on Espanya station to Talk:Espanya station. Cheers,  Philg88 talk 14:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Please, undo your last edit at Template:Google Nexus[edit]

Please, undo your last edit at Template:Google Nexus

That was 4 days ago. Anybody can edit it, including yourself. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 18:47, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
No, I cannot. Please, remove the page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.23.142.140 (talk) 18:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Oh I see. I can't unprotect it since I'm not an admin, but I will edit it to add the latest 2 models. Also, please sign your edits on talk pages, thanks. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 18:51, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bagà (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Das
Sant Llorenç de Morunys (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Navès

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Conca de Barberà[edit]

Thank you for your inputs at Conca de Barberà. I have never been to Catalonia but chose to expand this article, and certain others, because of the large number of points they are able to generate at DYK in the WikiCup. However my lack of knowledge of the region and my limited Spanish may have led me into errors, and I see you have corrected a few. Also, my knowledge is limited to what I can find online and you probably know a lot more about the region. Please feel free to add more information, and I can add you in to the DYK if you would like that. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: Hi. I am a regular visitor to the region (mainly Baixa Segarra), and know a bit of Catalan, but don't claim to be an expert. I'll see if I can do a bit more work there, but I'm not looking for DYK or any other credit, so you are welcome to press ahead with your improvements and maybe I'll keep an eye out for bits needing clarification. Cheers. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 13:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
OK, thanks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:08, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Porron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sfi logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sfi logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

update mayor[edit]

You've been doing updates on French towns with the edit summary of "update mayor". You've been adding {[reflist}}, which is an obvious problem. My bot should be able to take care of the articles. But, in case you are editing more articles, could you alter the script or however you are doing it. Bgwhite (talk) 01:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

@Bgwhite: Thanks for fixing that, and sorry for the inconvenience. I was pasting that text. I thought I checked the result each time, but clearly not. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 01:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Signpost exit poll[edit]

Dear Wikipedian, you recently voted in the ArbCom election. Your username, along with around 155 other usernames of your fellow Wikipedians, was randomly selected from the 2000+ Wikipedians who voted this year, with the help of one of the election-commissioners. If you are willing, could you please participate (at your option either on-wiki via userspace or off-wiki via email) in an exit poll, and answer some questions about how you decided amongst the ArbCom candidates?

  If you decide to participate in this exit poll, the statistical results will be published in the Signpost, an online newspaper with over 1000 Wikipedians among the readership. There are about twelve questions, which have alphanumerical answers; it should take you a few minutes to complete the exit poll questionnaire, and will help improve Wikipedia by giving future candidates information about what you think is important. This is only an unofficial survey, and will have no impact on your actual vote during this election, nor in any future election.

  All questions are individually optional, and this entire exit poll itself is also entirely optional, though if you choose not to participate, I would appreciate a brief reply indicating why you decided not to take part (see Question Zero). Thanks for being a Wikipedian

The questionnaire[edit]

Dear Wikipedian, please fill out these questions -- at your option via usertalk or via email, see Detailed Instructions at the end of the twelve questions -- by putting the appropriate answer in the blanks provided. If you decide not to answer a question (all questions are optional), please put the reason down: "undecided" / "private information" / "prefer not to answer" / "question is not well-posed" / "other: please specify". Although the Signpost cannot guarantee that complex answers can be processed for publication, it will help us improve future exit polls, if you give us comments about why you could not answer specific questions.

Detailed Instructions: you are welcome to answer these questions via usertalk (easiest), or via email (for a modicum of privacy).

We do promise to try hard, not to make any mistakes, in the processing and presentation of your answers. If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact column-editor GamerPro64, copy-editor 75.108.94.227, or copy-editor Ryk72. Thanks for reading, and thanks for helping Wikipedia. GamerPro64 14:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Gisbert Hasenjaeger[edit]

My article was under peer review and was just closed without a single comment. What's going on? scope_creep 10:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

@Scope creep: Unfortunately, there was/is a huge backlog at Peer Review and your request was sitting there for over a month with no response. In order to keep the backlog reasonable, the Peer Review guidelines suggest that any requests over a month old with no activity in the last two days should be removed, and that's what happened. Feel free to put in a new peer review request for it. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 10:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solsona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out at peer review![edit]

Feedback Responder Barnstar.png The Peer Review Barnstar
Thanks for your help at Wikipedia peer review! --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
@LT910001: Thanks a lot! (I'm not sure I've done that much though) Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 10:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten in a helmet.jpg
😸

Alan1Alias (talk) 23:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

@Alan1Alias: Thanks a lot. I promise I'll look after it. — Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 23:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

/* Burnt Candlemas */[edit]

Source:

https://books.google.com/books?id=MLclZRZCkXgC&pg=PA208&lpg=PA208&dq=burnt+candlemas&source=bl&ots=zaZB3vXHUe&sig=e37dRzgZIcLc4Lv9UbTtIfmVN5Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi08cLjtaHKAhVD5SYKHTrZAfgQ6AEIPTAF#v=onepage&q=burnt%20candlemas&f=false

Doesn't this dated month get us a bit closer than just the year? I don't think it was just one day. Kindest regards, Maury (talk) 09:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

@William Maury Morris II: Sure, if you have more information, fire ahead and add it. I just undid the addition of the year, which was redundant since it is the subject of the article. Cheers. — Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 13:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)