User talk:SGGH/Archive 2012/January
|This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.|
Articles for Creation Appeal
|Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2538 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.
Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
I don't think the user actually has a COI; to the contrary, the user account appears to be specifically created to disparage and attack the British Freedom Party. Nevertheless, as a group username it is misleading, and I have reported it as such. ZZArch talk to me 10:46, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, true. But I read its username as being part of its non-neutral stance, I personally wouldn't see the username by itself as a problem if it weren't for the contributions, thus why I took an COI/bias route over a username route. But the UAA report is still there for others to action. S.G.(GH) ping! 10:48, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Geoffrey Boycott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mangle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.