Trout this user

User talk:SPACKlick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This page was last edited or modified by Legobot (talk).

I hat discussions that I believe have finished, please feel free to turn them back into active discussions where needed.

Contents

Older Discussions[edit]

2012 x2
Titanic
Why are you supporting this Dongiago person? He is trying to thwart me every way he can. The fact is that using the term "original research" means that I am lying. The whole concept if original research is pathetic. A relative of mine put some info up on his own article and was accused of "original research". To say that some US newspaper reporter is the only one who tells the truth is plain crazy in my view. The Dongiago only accepts "verifiable sources". What the hell does that mean??? It means that no one can write anything! Policemen like him make the writing oif anything impossible. He is just playing games, and to be frank, it is doing my head in. Wallie (talk) 21:39, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
George Lazenby

Sorry, I didn't know that. I was familiar with alternate spellings (humor=humour) and jargon (apartment=flat), but was unaware of that aspect of linguistic differences. Thanks for the information. :-) Nightscream (talk) 11:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

2014 x25
January x8
RSN
The Reliable Sources Noticeboard is where I go. When you go there, first use the search engine to see if there have already been discussions on the source in question. If not, or if you feel there was not a clear consensus, or have a more specific permutation of the source to ask about, begin a new discussion, and remember to mention not only the source, but the article and/or information for which you wish to cite it. The editors there don't just want to be asked about a source; they want it to be specified what you're using it for. That board's search engine yields a few past discussions on Emporis, so I would start there. Hope that helps.! Nightscream (talk) 22:20, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Highest Town

Sorry. I seem not to be making edits correctly or not recording sources correctly. I substituted Nenthead, Cumbria for Flash, Staffordshire as the highest village in England. The evidence or source for this is the published Ordnance Survey 50 metre DEM (digital elevation model) which I have consulted. The evidence for the Flash claim cites [quote] Flash claims to be the highest village in England. In 2007 the claim was upheld by the BBC (actually The One Show), which settled a dispute with its rival claimant, Wanlockhead in Dumfries and Galloway. The Ordnance Survey (actually Starnet Geomatics) measured the highest house in each village and Flash was higher. Neither the BBC nor Ordnance survey considered Nenthead therefore their work was fundamentally flawed. I have given figures for the highest property in Nenthead within the defined village limits, based on highway signage. There are other higher properties but which are arguably outside of the village. The Ordnance Survey 50m DEM which I have referred to is a recognised published source. Regards Ashe (Asheshouse (talk) 12:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)).

Nenthead has made the claim several times, however consulting a map and interpreting which settlement counts and is highest etc. is WP:OR. You would need to find a source more reliable than the BBC and the Guiness world Records that claims Nenthead as the highest.SPACKlick (talk) 13:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
You misunderstand me. It is the claim by Flash which is WP:OR. They only compared two places and did not include Nenthead in their assessment. I have spoken directly to Guiness World Records and they have said that they do not maintain a record of the highest village in Britain and have no interest in it. The 2007 work was not done by Ordnance Survey, so both the sources quoted for Flash are false. Reference to the official OS Mapping constitutes a reliable published source and has more authority than either of those false claims. The difference in level is significant enough to put the matter beyond doubt. (Asheshouse (talk) 14:05, 23 January 2014 (UTC)).
Beyond doubt in your opinion. But do you have a source that states that? For Flash as the highest village a quick google finds the telegraph[1] Peak district info[2] the independent[3] Macclesfield Express[4] all in favour of Flash. Adding Nenthead to the google search finds Visit cumbria[5] and the independent [6]
Compare the independent articles carefully, the one in favour of Flash is newer and states;
Both villages claim - falsely - to be England's highest, at around 1,450ft,
although Nenthead has rather sneakily attempted to raise the bar by
claiming that houses situated further up the hill are part of the village.
until you can present a source to counter this, your claim is unsourced and constitutes WP:OR SPACKlick (talk) 14:21, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
I have always hesitated to accept newspaper articles as a reliable source. Since you accept the latest Independent article I would quote;
Situated atop what's known locally as "God's Treasure House", Wanlockhead is a mere
13ft nearer heaven than Flash in Staffordshire. It's in the Uplands rather than the
Highlands, tucked away in the Lowther Hills of Dumfries and Galloway, on a block of
rock containing lead, zinc, copper, silver and some of the purest gold on earth.
That would make the claims here wrong: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash,_Staffordshire.
Perhaps the only correct position would be acknowledge that there is no agreement on the matter.
Certainly there isn't consensus and noting that there is dispute would be worthwhile. That said OS clearly found that Flash was 102feet higher than Wanlockhead;
Flash leapt up in height 40ft to 1558ft, while Wanlockhead, with a population of 156,
was downgraded to a meagre 1456ft - much to the chagrin of the Scots.
Nenthead only claims to be 1500feet leaving it 58 short of Flash. Flash is the best supported answer. SPACKlick (talk) 15:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC) [Also note I edited your formatting for ease of reading]
This is a key point from the recent BBC/OS work. The criteria for assessment was agreed, here quoted from the Flash, Stafordshire wiki entry;
The Ordnance Survey measured the highest house in each village and Flash was higher
Using the same criteria at Nenthead gives 1580ft (482m). Noting another comment above.
Both villages claim - falsely - to be England's highest, at around 1,450ft,
although Nenthead has rather sneakily attempted to raise the bar by
claiming that houses situated further up the hill are part of the village.
Nenthead has not "raised the bar" simply applied the same rule used by others. The house at 1580ft is adjacent to the main road through the village (A689) and inside the village limits defined by the highway village sign. I would suggest that reference to the OS 50m DTM is a reliable independent source. No interpretation involved. You just read off the numbers. (Asheshouse (talk) 15:22, 23 January 2014 (UTC)).
Evidently it does require interpretation or everyone would get the same answer. Those houses are evidently not considered by the independent reporter to be part of the village. You are simply misunderstanding what constitutes WP:OR unless you can find a source where somebody explicitly says nenthead is the highest village and gain consensus on the talk page it is inappropriate to put that in the articles. In terms of the interpretation, which house would you say was the highest house within the village of nenthead? Would it be one on Church Lane or one on National Route 7 (as google calls it)? How could you easily judge? It would be personal interpretation and this would make an elevation difference of nearly 30m. SPACKlick (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

The village limits are decided by the highways authority, so no interpretation required. They indicate it by the positioning of the village signs and speed limits. Those on the A689 (NR7) are shown here http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff113/Asheshouse/Image1_zpsb91e0807.jpg The highest house is the prominent one on the left. I cannot comment on what may have been in the mind of the Independent Reporter when, or if, they visited Nenthead. (Asheshouse (talk) 17:41, 23 January 2014 (UTC)).

Again you've made an interpretation that a) the highways authority is definitively correct and B that house falls within a boundary marked only by points. Find a reliable source that actually makes the claim or the claim has no place on wikipedia SPACKlick (talk) 22:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
I would suggest that English Hertitage is a reliable source and more reliable and authoritative than the general press.
The research department has produced a report on the area, Report No 054-2010 The Parish of Alston Moor - Historic Assessment. The report may be downloaded here: http://services.english-heritage.org.uk/ResearchReportsPdfs/064_2010WEB.pdf

I quote from the introduction, page 1 and 2;

Alston and Nenthead are both sited on a considerable gradient, Alston lies at  between 265 and 330 metres
above sea level,allowing it to claim to be the highest market town in England (an assertion disputed by
Buxton, Derbyshire), Garrigill is at about 345 metres and Nenthead at between 430 and 475 metres, giving
Nenthead the accolade of being the highest village in England and having the highest parish church.
English Heritage being a national body of considerable academic authority may be considered a highly credible source. (Asheshouse (talk) 10:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)).
Excellent, now we have competing sources. That is a discussion for the talk page to garner consensus as it is now a disputed source. Put the two sources there and see what people say. SPACKlick (talk) 10:29, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry -- I don't understand what is being asked. Which "talk page"? Which two sources? I really do not know how to progress this matter.(Asheshouse (talk) 10:38, 24 January 2014 (UTC)). Ah sorry, each article has its own talk page for discussing just this sort of disagreement within sources, I've summarised the situatuion with Nenthead vs Flash [[1]]. Jump in and have a look. SPACKlick (talk) 10:47, 24 January 2014 (UTC) References

Pink Moon

Hi - although it's not me making the edits adding the Pitchfork review of Pink Moon, technically speaking the people doing it are correct that the link gives the album 10/10. The overall score of 8.5 is for the Tuck Box box set as a whole, but if you look underneath the album cover they also give individual scores for each of the five albums included in the box set, which give the overall average of 8.5 (8.6 actually, but I'm not going to argue with Pitchfork's maths). Whether a score taken from part of a box set rather than the individual album should be included in the reviews is another matter... Richard3120 (talk) 00:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

WP:RPP

Hi. I corrected the article to the one I think you wanted to protect? You must report the right page and look at the capitalization of letter to make sure it is correct. QED237 (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Page Protections

Hi. There is no good idea to protect pages against a single editors. A page protection is for pages being vandalized by many IP's and were it is to hard to block all IP's. In the cases you reported it is a single IP user and in those cases you should warn the user on their talkpage and report them to WP:AIV. QED237 (talk) 15:18, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

That is why your requests has been declined. QED237 (talk) 15:19, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Marriage Penalty

Stop vandalizing the "Marriage Penalty" page. Look at the sources I cited if you do not understand the issue. Do not delete text and references just because you don't understand it. I will report your vandalism if you don't stop it. 15:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.152.41.187 (talk)

This is clearly a content dispute and not vandalism. SPACKlick has shown interest in discussing this so you should discuss instead of making this threats. Failing to discuss from either part and I will report you. QED237 (talk) 16:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
NorthWestern Energy

Hello, Please advise me on why you changed my edits to the NorthWestern Energy page. What can I do to provide verifiable content (e.g., the correct logo). Also some of the news was close to 10 years old so what is the best way to update the information without being un-done. Thanks for getting back to me. SSMalee (talk) 19:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC)SSMalee

Hi There SSMalee, Your changes consisted of;
* adding two orphaned references
* Changing the Logo, no reason given
* changing their operational paramaters in the infobox with no provided source
* Removed pretty much the whole article which has sources.
If you'd like to come to the talk page and discuss those changes one by one, I'm sure we can improve the artice SPACKlick (talk) 13:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello SPACKlick, Thanks for getting back to me. As an employee of NorthWestern Energy here are some of my responses: -- I changed the logo because the one currently posted applies to a company that no longer exists. In 2003, NorthWestern Energy, (the company that used the globe as an O in the logo) filed for restructuring protection. In 15 months, a newly formed and solid company emerged. Since it was a new company, we retained the name but changed the logo by removing the globe. From a branding issue, we really want to update logo. -- I updted all the company information in the sidebar to reflect the exact information the company regurlarly files with the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). The summary statements are our formal statements and we updte the information and file it with the SEC at least annually. -- I deleted the information under the Controversial section because the lawsuits related to the 2005 explosion were settled several years ago. NorthWestern Energy worked in good faith and as quickly as possible to resolve the many lawsuits as a result of the unfortunate incident in Bozeman; however, the case is closed and is far from the only lawsuit we deal with daily. By mentioning only one lawsuit, it paints an incomplete, outadated and inaccurate picture. -- Please tell me how to cit information I poste. Can I use company press releases? Obviously, you did not like the reference to the SEC documents either. What do you consider objective and verifiable references? -- I could post some more current information about NorthWestern Energy, but I really want to avoid this delete-repost game. Thanks for getting back to me. 16:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)16:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.96.16.11 (talk)

If you can find some primary sources (press releases/company website etc.) and some secondary sources (reliable news outlets reporting the reformation of the company) I'll help work out sources but essentially you use < ref > < /ref > tags around the reference that refers to the piece of information in each sentence, things in the lead and infobox should be within the main article. SPACKlick (talk) 18:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
OPC Demographics

This demographic information that I have contributed to this entry is FAR better sourced than the rest of the article. One quarter of Americans have zero white lineage. But if you look at the general assembly photo I sourced, you will see that the OPC is clearly a white denomination. The OPC once even said so themselves, but they have failed to even inquire into this issue since the 1970s.

Please discuss this on the Talk page of the Article. Talk:Orthodox_Presbyterian_Church.
The source you are using does not make the statements you are making, you are interpreting them from the sources, this is a violation of WP's policies. Either find sources making the claims you have put in the article or do not put them in the article.
Additionally, not having a source for a census is not the same as having a source for no census. Your edits, in totality constitute WP:OR and thus violate WP's Policies.SPACKlick (talk) 12:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia: the Missing Manual FYI: WP:EDITSNOTEDITORS (The secret cure for edit wars) Pass it on. 172.129.246.164 (talk) 10:29, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

February - August x5
Thanks

Thanks for this edit. It was a copyright violation cut and pasted from here: [2] (Note the reference in the deleted material). 71.139.148.156 (talk) 17:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, SPACKlick. You have new messages at NinjaRobotPirate's talk page.
Message added 09:28, 7 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:28, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Removing Warning from talk page

Hello. I noticed that you advised 213.160.115.66 not to remove warnings from their talk page. That actually is allowed - see WP:OWNTALK for details. Users are not permitted to remove some templates though, such as shared IP notice (which I restored) and declined unblock notices whilst the user was still blocked. --k6ka’‘‘(talk | contribs) 12:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I must have misread those guidelines at some point in the past. SPACKlick (talk) 13:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
I think we've all done that at some point or other. Basically we assume that they've read any warnings that they remove. Obviously there are some notices that can be restored such as the ones K6ka mentioned.’‘‘Green Giant (talk)‘‘‘13:41, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Michael Shermer

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:53, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Explaining

I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 14:03, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014 x5
Right Back Atchya

I replied to your gracious note here. Thank you. David in DC (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

User warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Trial of Oscar Pistorius. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. ’‘‘Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. ’‘‘Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you’‘‘may be blocked from editing. HelenOnline 09:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

As a note in case this becomes relevant later. The "Edit war" is two reverts of an edit to Oscar Pistorius as I believe the charge being placed by HelenOnline violates BLP. Per BRD I reverted her Bold change and discussed on the talk page. Most sources call it one thing and further discussion is ongoing there. SPACKlick (talk) 09:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Your request for rollback
Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg

Hi SPACKlick. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 11:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks SPACKlick (talk) 11:50, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Extended content

Hey. Just a note asking you to sign your comment on the Smeetesh Patel ANI just so users know who commented. Cheers --’‘‘NickGibson3900 Talk‘‘‘10:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Whoops, thanks for the catch. SPACKlick (talk) 10:55, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Article lede for Electronic cigarette

Thank you for your work on the new lede. I've finalized adding citations and wordsmithing the text on the Talk page. Please do a final review and proceed to update the article proper. Should be an easy copy/paste job. Mihaister (talk) 19:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for that I'll come have a shufti. SPACKlick (talk) 09:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Looks like the good Doc reverted to the old lede, because the new one had only 2 paragraphs. I've broken the one on the Talk page into 3 paragraphs, so let's try again. Mihaister (talk) 17:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
November - December 2014 x7
General Sanctions Gamergate
Commons-emblem-notice.svg Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. Dreadstar 12:40, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

{cob}}

Thank you

Thanks, that's very kind :) I must say I was impressed with the way you handled the summary of everyone's position, and your comments about the previous such summary. Good luck for the future :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 02:26, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Giving a barnstar

Are you serious about giving Bretonbanquet a barnstar for civility [3] during the DRN? Ok, the user was civil in concession, but this [4] and this [5], coming from that same DRN, don't quite demonstrate much civility. And why did you give only that particular user such a barnstar? I would think that GyaroMaguus, Burgring and maybe even Twirlypen are even more entitled to receive such a barnstar. Tvx1 (talk) 16:45, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

@Tvx1: I tend only to give the barnstars to people who I disagreed with, it's a lot less fair to judge people who you are in agreement with as you almost always see them in a more positive light. I also particularly noted Breton because I was uncivil towards him in places and he didn't get baited by it. The first diff you posted was borderline uncivil but was far less snarky than I'd have been in his position and the second diff wasn't uncivil at all. Now GyaroMaguus was certainly civil and if any of those disputing with him felt civil enough for a barnstar then i'd wholly support that. SPACKlick (talk) 09:36, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Alien or Xenomorph

You closed the discussion, but i'm not sure a clear concensus was reached for Alien. In fact, when i count, i reach the opposite conclusion. Pro Xenomorph: Urammar, Nytemyre, 94.208.108.19, NinjaRobotPirate, ミーラー強斗武, me (PizzaMan) Pro Alien: Serendipodous, Lagrange613, Rhododendrites, McGeddon That's a 6 to 4 majority for Xenomorph. Just because those four editors keep replying to every point made pro Xenomorph until other editors are done with it and move on, that doesn't make them right.PizzaMan (♨♨) 11:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

@PizzaMan:: Per WP:Consensus Consensus on Wikipedia does not mean unanimity (which, although an ideal result, is not always achievable); nor is it the result of a vote. Decision-making involves an effort to incorporate all editors' legitimate concerns, while respecting Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I looked at the strength of the case rathter than a simple tally of pro and con editors. I did not feel a compelling case had been made for Xenomorph as the common name, which surprised me because in my social circles it is referred to as the Xenomorph, but we're geeks and personal usage doesn't define common names. If you feel I closed it inappropriately please see here for the process for dispute. SPACKlick (talk) 12:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
I don't care much for the Alien franchise, i just saw the RfC and gave my opinion that it's not right for any franchise to claim the generic word "Alien". I've had a discouraging amount of WP: policies thrown against me when i once dared to disagree with the majority on another topic, so i just wanted to point it to you that you went by the minority opinion when closing the RfC. I'll leave it up to you if this was a correct decision. PizzaMan (♨♨) 15:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Expanded Positions

I like the idea, but Im not sure if those choices will be counted in the RFC. Perhaps it would be a good idea to make sure people know that those entries may not be counted in the RFC, big and bold. It would be a shame if Health effects was at the top of the article because few made a choice at the top (1, 2, or 3) but medical editors. AlbinoFerret 04:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

A current post by Zad may be confirming what I said about the chart not counting. link to section he started AlbinoFerret 14:32, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Cheers AF, didn't spot these posts. Yeah, I wasn't looking to have it counted in the RFC, I doubt the RFC was formatted well enough to be valid but I just wanted people to be aware that there were more options within the scope of the discussion. The table was just a straw poll to see which options consensus was ever likely to reach. For instance I'm not going to argue to hard for my preferred version because it's clearly not going to gain consensus any time soon. SPACKlick (talk) 13:09, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
I just want to avoid a misconception possibly by some editors that adding to the table is just as good as leaving a comment on the RFC. The more people who actually comment on the RFC is good for the article. Everyone who is involved in the article should leave a comment if they want to be heard in case it is found valid. AlbinoFerret 16:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleting others Talk Page Comments, Jeremy Kewley

I'm sorry, but your comments are ridiculous. I am not a new user, I have been editing for 10 years. I will not allow offensive comments to be left on anyone's talk page, even if that person is accused of serious crimes. I have reported the offending user to the BLP noticeboard for action. Please read the comments this person has made, and the offensive edit summaries. There is no carte blanche on the talk pages, and it is perfectly acceptable to remove offending material. --Dmol (talk) 13:01, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holiday's

I hope you have a great time with family and friends and a happy new year. AlbinoFerret 20:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

TheNorlo ban request

Hi there, please feel free to support or oppose the ban proposal concerning me. Thanks. TheNorlo (talk) 01:02, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

2015 x 34
February x 2
Help on Big data?

(Posting this on User:Rui Gabriel Correia, User:BlueRasberry, User:SPACKlick)'s pages) Hi! I hope it's okay to ask for your help on Big Data, since you've been involved in the current discussion. Frankly, I feel that while User:Jugdev is most likely acting in good faith, he is engaged in disruptive editing. I think we're locked in a pattern: If I revert the page during the US day (and explain why), he'll revert it again in the middle of the US night (and post a message saying "I already explained that my change is in keeping with WP style and it comes from a highly respected source"). (example, example, example) Honestly, I think our only play--assuming he hasn't already crossed the line to disruptive editing--is to take turns reverting changes. If it's always "Narsil reverts, Jugdev unreverts, Narsil ununreverts", then we're both edit-warring. If several WP editors revert his changes and he's always unreverting, I think we have a clear case that he's being disruptive. Apologies for bothering you! If you'd rather not be involved any further I totally understand. (P.S. I see he's already been blocked once, recently, for edit warring. I'll ask User:Kuru--who imposed the block--whether he's reached that point again.) Narsil (talk) 19:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Daisaku Ikeda

It appears that Catflap08 is in parallel pursuing a thread at WP:ANI accusing editor Hoary of threats at the same time as asking for help at WP:DRN. As a relatively new (but busy) volunteer at WP:DRN, I am not sure whether that is permitted or appropriate, although I think that it is inappropriate. You may want to tell the editors again to comment on content, not contributors, or might even consider failing the mediation. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:11, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

March x 5
Proverbs of Hendyng

Hello SPACKlick! I just wanted to check why you undid my edit on cunt: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cunt&oldid=649817267&diff=prev. I made an entry for the text, the Proverbs of Hendyng, which contains an early attestation of cunt and which is mentioned in that entry. Cunt previously linked to a similar but different text, the Proverbs of Alfred. I'm not sure why you reverted my edit so if you could let me know, that would be helpful! Alarichall (talk) 10:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

@Alarichall: short version is because I'm an idiot. Long version I misread who'd added what. I thought, for some reason, the new edit had added the Alfred easter egg link. I've undone it now. SPACKlick (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! Alarichall (talk) 10:28, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Notification

I have asked for some clarification at WP:NPOVN#Gospel of Matthew: 50 CE. - Ret.Prof (talk) 02:25, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: Top Gear 2002

Hello, it's back at the right place, for now. Sorry about that ... I didn't intend the page to be gone for that long! I will do another move on it soon to complete the history merge. Graham87 12:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Lift (force)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 31 March 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 03:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Request for mediation accepted
The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Lift (force), in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Lift (force), so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.

As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

March 2015 post signing

Just a friendly reminder to sign your posts on talk pages. You didn't sign the last two on the Top Gear (2002) talk page, which makes it difficult for other editors to follow the flow of discussion, and who says what. --Drmargi (talk) 21:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Slow it down a bit

You made more than three reverts at the e-cigs page. QuackGuru (talk) 05:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

I think this may have been a compromise to use it once instead of twice. QuackGuru (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

I made two reverts to different undiscussed additions and left the page for a whie, no need to comment to me just because your ownership is being challenged. SPACKlick (talk) 07:40, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=655461925&oldid=655457035 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656291797&oldid=656291338 Revert one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656298163&oldid=656298112 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656303862&oldid=656303264 Revert two.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656305106&oldid=656303862 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656306218&oldid=656305106 Revert three.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656311733&oldid=656311581 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656311834&oldid=656311733 Revert four.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656362329&oldid=656345708 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=next&oldid=656362329 Revert five.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=prev&oldid=656384228 My edit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=656384442&oldid=656384228 Revert six. QuackGuru (talk) 07:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

April x 12
Electronic Cigarette
Hi SPACKlick, further to our quick discussion on the article talk page I am now going to start going through the article, correcting the grammatical mistakes and re-wording sentences where the text either does not flow well or read easily. I'm fairly sure that there is quite a lot of this material in there so this should keep me occupied for a while! But I see that you have started making lists that are obviously intended for reordering things so I will try and leave the sentencing structure as untouched as possible and maybe we can combine our efforts at some point? I will also post a section on the article talk page soon linking to my sandbox so the issues can be discussed with other editors. In the meantime feel free to comment on any edits that I am making.Levelledout (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Sounds cool, my overall listing is for topic structure rathern than grammar and wording within topics, if yu can neaten som eof the language and writing up then I can patch it into the revised structure at a later date, if I can ever finish the structure. It's soul destroying reading Quack's gibberish. SPACKlick (talk) 19:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
General sanctions
Commons-emblem-notice.svg Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to electronic cigarettes.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Bishonen | talk 22:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC).
Please don't edit war
Hi, SPACKlick. Please don't WP:edit war on Electronic cigarette. Why exactly do you reject the second half of "E-cigarettes are regulated as a medical device in some countries, but are not permitted to be used as a smoking cessation aid"? The source says: "Some countries do not accept e-cigarettes as a cessation tool for smokers, yet regulate it as a medical product." Yet you repeatedly claim that "Source says nothing about countries permitting people to use them as cessation aids."[6] Did you read the full version of the article? Bishonen | talk 08:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC).
@Bishonen: First this ought to be on the talk page of the article rather than my talk page however. I have read the full article and several others. Permit, Allow, and all other words relating to regulation have a significantly different meaning that accept. Accept relates to understanding. Different words mean different things, the words used in the article don't mean the same as the words used in the source. I don't know how else to say it.
Second, I didn't edit war. I removed content which failed verification, the onus is then on the user adding content to show that it is verifiable in a reliable source. That has not been achieved. I reverted once yesterday after giving QG time to fix it, he did a non-fix, I reverted once today. SPACKlick (talk) 08:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Oh, you really do think that failed verification? Then please do take it to article talk, rather than merely using those less-than-explanatory edit summaries. Tell the editors of the page about the difference between accept and permit and see if you get agreement for removing the text on that score. You have reverted twice, for a highly technical reason, and then you tell me I ought to take it to talk? No. I have no intention of editing the article. I'm warning you as an uninvolved admin. Your page is the place for that. Bishonen | talk 09:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC).
@Bishonen: If you look on the talk page you'll see it's ALREADY under discussion. It was under discussion BEFORE I reverted it. The editor who "Boldly" added it before I discussed it and then reverted it, re-added it without explanation or truly engaging in the discussion. He added it by the way along with 17K of edits which were prepared without discussion during the pages protection on his Sanbox (note the missing d so it's not easy to find) without ever mentioning it to any other editor. I note you're not warning Quack for re-adding without reaching consensus through discussion.
And drop the sarcasm Oh, you really do think that failed verification? Of course I think it failed verification, which is why I've said at all stages that it failed verification.
Second I ask you to remove any implication that I have been warned for behaviour in an admin capacity where I haven't even come close to crossing a line. Also, if you're warning someone as uninvolved and admin might be worth using the words warning and admin rather than just looking like some user who's decided to come to my talk page and comment on a valid edit of unsourced material without reading the discussion on the talk page.
Really starting to remember why I was fucking done editing that mess of an article.SPACKlick (talk) 09:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I looked for a discussion of the wording in the article as compared to the sourcing when I was writing up my note to you after I noticed this edit, and didn't find it. For domestic reasons, I had to wait a few hours to post, and I now see you added some discussion not long after your edit. Sorry about that, bad timing on my part.
I would hope you'd take the advice of experienced editors (="some user who's decided to come to my talk page") seriously whether they're admins or not. As for mentioning my admin status, I see on your page that you'd like to be an admin some day. If that happens, you'll discover that admins are always either reproached for not saying they're admin, or, if they do mention it, accused of throwing their admin weight around. There's no pleasing people in that regard, which is one of the delights of the job. My warning stands, you know. Also, while users are traditionally given more leeway on their own pages, it really would be better for all concerned if you avoided this kind of throwaway attack in all public places. If you must talk like that, take it to e-mail. Bishonen | talk 10:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC).
That's not an attack. That's a discussion of content. The wording of the edit's that Quack has made is barely English and I will not refrain from saying so unless consensus is formed that Quack's prose is fluent, at which point I will bow to consensus. I'll never say that kind of thing behind someone's back because I'd rather keep my thoughts in the open so they can be modified by the actions of others and so nobody is lied to.
I'll happily take the advice of experienced editors, but with no prior knowledge of your experience I opened with a response that a discussion about whether a revert of content was justified would likely be more productive on the talk page where as it happened discussion was already happening and then I explained in the venue of your choosing why I reverted the addition of unsourced POV material.
In short, I think your warning is bullshit, completely against BRD and in identical circumstances there is every chance I would revert twice in two days again, ESPECIALLY if the editor involved has the same history of lack of comprehension that I have found with QuackGuru. This is the kind of thing reverts are for. When an editor reads "red car's are not obligatory in Peru" and adds "Red cars are banned in peru" there is no edit for that, there is no statement worth having on the wikipedia from that source so you revert and on the talk page say "the source doesn't say it's banned it say's it's not obligatory" and the editor adding the nonsense has to justify it's inclusion. Quack justified NOTHING and was left to revert in peace. I reverted the addition of unsourced bullshit and got warned. It's fucking ridiculous.
I'm steaming fucking mad right now so I'm walking away from any e-cig editing until I've calmed down. Especially as I've just twigged it was you who said you'd ban Levelledout for reverting Quack for doing EXACTLY what admins told him not to do. Why is Quack untouchable when he's been one of the main causes of issue in the article? Paid editors never got anything in that shouldn't have been there for more than a few hours. Advocates have never slanted the page into too pro e-cig a stance. Information about risks has never been removed for more than 24 hours. Thanks to the work of Med Editors like Doc James, editors who can check their POV like KDP and unbiased editors like S Marshall but the page is a barely readable disjointed mess because of the way Quack writes, bulk edits, ignores context & flow and takes ownership. It's just bullshit, bullshit being supported by admins.SPACKlick (talk) 10:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
"It's soul destroying reading Quack's gibberish" is a discussion of content? OK, I'm done for now. Bishonen | talk 11:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC).
Yes, to call the content of an article so badly written that it's impossible to read through in one go is a discussion of content. You'll notice several other editors making similar comments on the articles talk page if you care to read it.
  • I don't really have words for what Quack did, but it's a mess. I'm going to remove a few contradictions, but the text needs cleaned up. Again. I wish he'd leave the writing to others because he's shit at it. FergusM1970
  • The way the article is written right now is atrocious. Much of it is rambling, meandering, ungrammatical and has appalling syntax. It urgently needs to be made concise and readable....For example this mess: same author
  • in response to QG saying something was too wordy That's somewhat ironic coming from you, QG! Johnbod
  • I think the actual problem we have here is methodological....It leads to paragraphs that are at once choppily-phrased and convoluted in meaning. S. Marshall
  • Yeah, much of the article is unreadable, worse than typical label fine print. Tsavage
  • this endless medical and legislative rambling that we have right now TheNorlo
  • The Quack is coming and will probably quack every thing up. TheNorlo
  • the intro of this article is now ridiculously long and littered with crap
  • I find it very disjointed and hard to read as it stands.
and many many more. It's an issue of concern with the contents of the article. Is it phrased somewhat cheaply? Sure but Quack has been told time and time again that he needs to work on the phrasing and positioning of his edits and refuses to listen. He doesn't get kid gloves because he's shown a lack of WP:CompetenceSPACKlick (talk) 11:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Old Boys of The Scots College (Sydney), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Stanford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Lead section ordering
Hello again SPACKlick, I'm practically finished with the lead which wasn't in a terrible condition but still needed some work (I think the rest of the article is likely a lot worse). Have you had any thoughts about ordering for the lead? We have the intro paragraph. Then we have two paragraphs on Safety (instead of one) for no apparent reason although I can see it being very controversial some editors trying to get that changed. Then the 4th paragraph is the one I have the problem with and is pretty much impossible to fit into any kind of coherency at the moment. It's a jumbled summary of the Usage section, the History section and the Legal section. Any ideas? If not I'll propose what I've got soon as I think it's still an improvement.Levelledout (talk) 01:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank You
Your talk page pointed me towards closing RFC's. I am a firm believer in the RFC process and I love being able to read them. It gives a very good opportunity to look at the application of policy by other users. It also satisfies a ferrets constant curiosity. AlbinoFerret 13:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Yep, it was a real boon getting on the feeback request service although it does tend to fill the talk page a little. I get 1 a day and respond to about 20% but you can set it to any pace you want. SPACKlick (talk) 14:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Might want to have a look again
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#.22Phantom.22_Consensus_Talks --NeilN talk to me 19:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
@NeilN: did you notice the </humour> tag? Added to imply the previous was a joke? SPACKlick (talk) 07:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Saw it, but not sure what you mean. I was referring to the post by the Islamic calendar IP. --NeilN talk to me 13:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
@NeilN: Sorry, completely miscontrued you there, didn't see the comment from the IP and so will have a more detailed look. SPACKlick (talk) 14:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
And you're leaving an unsigned template on my talkpage why?

And you're leaving an unsigned template on my talkpage why? I have never edited that article, or at least not in the last five months. --B (talk) 11:20, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

@B: Apologies for the unsigned, I was under the impression GS messages were meant to be left unsigned. As for editing the page my scan showed you as editing the talk page for Electronic cigarette on the 8th of April. I see now that it was just removing a use of the bat symbol logo. SPACKlick (talk) 11:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Please sign them. Doc James (talkcontribsemail) 12:08, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Images used under a claim of fair use outside of the article namespace are not permitted and are to be removed anywhere they are found. I have a list at User:B/Fair use images used outside of mainspace that I am using that shows the offending uses. I have no opinion on the any dispute that may exist about the electronic cigarettes article. I would humbly suggest, though, that if this article is under probation (well, for that matter, even if it isn't), you may wish to not use edit summaries like [7] as they could be considered incivil. --B (talk) 14:41, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
what's this general sanctions thingie about?

Haven't even been in there in a week and as far as I know all of my edits were welcome. This is isn't a good way to attract the copy editors you all seem to agree that you need. Elinruby (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

@Elinruby:As the notice says, the warning doesn't imply any kind of misbehaviour on your part it is to let you know that administrators have extra powers to sanction behaviour at those articles. Users editing in that space should receive the warning to be aware of te extra scrutiny. SPACKlick (talk) 09:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

er... pretty sure that's on the page somewhere Elinruby (talk) 10:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

@Elinruby: It's not my system, it's just how general sanctions work. As I said it isn't there to imply impropriety in your editing it's just a notice for your awareness. SPACKlick (talk) 11:19, 12 April 2015 (UTC)


@SPACKlick: erm but why did you feel moved to send it to me is what I am wondering? I see that you also sent it to a lot of other people, I do get that, But do we not already know? I'm confused. Presumably you have issues with someone's behaviour, I take it. But that's been going on for a while too. Why now? Elinruby (talk) 11:24, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

@Elinruby: Sanctions came into effect April 1st and I noticed a fair few editrs hadn;t been notified so I took a dump of everyone who edited since April 1st and notified them if they weren't on the already notified list. You pinged as edting 18 times on the main page and talk for the main page on April 4th and 5th. SPACKlick (talk) 11:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

@SPACKlick: yes, all copy edits that nobody had any issues with as far as I can tell. Lots of use of the talk page. Everybody agrees the page needs editing. Quackdoc is pretty defensive though. Already on the verge of saying life was too short before I got warned, sheesh, people skills man, people skills.

@Elinruby: Well I apologise if it's offended you or put you off but it's a standard piece of wiki bureaucracy to inform editors editing on pages where general sanctions apply with the standard template. s you can see from the sanctions page, every editor, whether there are behaviour issues or not is informed of the sanctions. The template is for information, not for warning or sanction and says so clearly. SPACKlick (talk) 13:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

@SPACKlick: it's not so much offensive as offputting. The article is already annoying. I could care less about the topic. Have fun with QuackDoc or whatever his nsme is Elinruby (talk) 13:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Islamic Calendar Diversion
::As you're so knowledgeable about this, can you explain why @NeilN: put a similar notice on my talk re Muhammad images when that was dealt with by individual arb sanctions with no general sanctions whatsoever? 87.81.147.76 (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
What are you on about now? Pages related to Muhammad are subject to discretionary sanctions. --NeilN talk to me 16:22, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Within the area of conflict, editors are expected to comply with all applicable policies and guidelines. There's no policy that says a caption is exempt. Indeed, if it was a caption to a scientific diagram could be seriously misleading. 87.81.147.76 (talk) 18:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
@87.81.147.76: Please take this to the article talk page rather than here, that's the appropriate venue. SPACKlick (talk) 18:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you very much for doing some much-needed copyediting on Electronic cigarette‎. It's been a constant source of amazement to me the way some editors complain and complain about prose, verbosity, repetition, etc, but never lift a finger to fix even the obvious. Bishonen | talk 16:07, 13 April 2015 (UTC).
I'd decided for a long time not to, because I was sick of dealing with accusations of POV. I figured I've now fired enough incivility into the fire that If I get whacked with POV I've earned by block for other things. I can't imagine my effort to deal with the page will last long once Quack gets back though. SPACKlick (talk) 16:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep improving the article and welcome the "unavoidable" coming block to display it on your user page under "Awards and honors". It'll actually would mean something unlike those proudly displayed barnstars ;) Cheers,--TMCk (talk) 17:09, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
And sure it didn't last long. I'm sure Bishonen will take appropriate measures once they're aware of it.--TMCk (talk) 18:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Text was accidentally deleted and a lot of text was not duplication of other sources. So the reasons for deleting a lot of the text is debatable. The 2014 review was not unreliable or dated. I reviewed the changed and made improvements and follow up edits such as this edit. QuackGuru (talk) 05:21, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Not for future editors, certainly Quack made changes. Very little of what Quack did can be reasonably called improvements. SPACKlick (talk) 09:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Moved discussion about 3RR at e-cig to WP:AN
I've moved the discussion you were having about the 3RR violation at e-cig from

here to here at WP:AN. Zad68 13:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

I think 3RRNB is the appropriate venue and I'm happy to do the move myself. Just to get this over with SPACKlick (talk) 13:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. QuackGuru (talk) 15:49, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

RFAR
[8] The discussion is now in a third place? Ha. Well, why not, there are still several boards it hasn't appeared at yet. Thanks for your comment. I may withdraw to Bishzilla's pocket for a while. Bishonen | talk 16:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC).
May x 1
Thank you [Jbeans hominini]

Hello, and thank you for the notice; it’s a really-felt honor coming from an editor as you. Ah but the irony: I am marked for keeping to my work station, just after I ‘closed the lid’ and left town---with a promise to cease & desist from the ‘Wp thing’ for the whole downtime. For my part whatever, I am grateful to you for posting the (hominid/hominin) problem onto the board; I had been brooding over it for some time with no confidence about how to proceed. Your post set the motion.Jbeans (talk) 17:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Jbeans (talk) 17:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

June x 1
Primate Researchers

When Jane Goodall looked in a mirror, she saw a chimpanzee. When Dian Fossey looked in a mirror, she saw a gorilla. When a chimpanzee looks at the zoo-goers, he sees chimpanzees. When a gorilla looks at the zoo-goers, he sees gorillas. We are all anthropoids. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

July x8
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. QuackGuru (talk) 03:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to a community sanction
Commons-emblem-hand.svg The following sanction has been imposed on you:

You are prohibited from adding images to or removing images from articles related to electronic cigarettes, broadly construed, until July 31, 2015 23:59 UTC.

You have been sanctioned because of your disruptive image removals on Electronic cigarette in the face of apparent consensus.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator as authorised by the community's decision at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Electronic cigarettes, and the procedure described by the general sanctions guidelines. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. —Darkwind (talk) 09:18, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Yep, clearly at fault. Thanks for a reasonable length of sanction. SPACKlick (talk) 09:52, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015 [Civility notice re:Quack]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a comment on the page talk:Chemicals in electronic cigarette aerosol that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please do not use language as you left here. Thank you Ping me with {{u|Jim1138}} and sign "~~~~" or message me on my talk page. 23:54, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry but I really do call a spade a spade when it comes to Quack. He's demonstrated repeated inability to understand simple concepts and hear arguments. He showed ignorance and IDHT behaviour. I won't temper my comments about Quack because they are factual and demonstrable. SPACKlick (talk) 11:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
That would appear to be your interpretation of QG's views. It appears to me to be a personal attack. Please read wp:npa If you have an issue with QG, take it all the way up the ladder to wp:ANI if necessary. Please be wp:civil. Repeat attacks may result in a wp:block Ping me with {{u|Jim1138}} and sign "~~~~" or message me on my talk page. 18:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring at Electronic cigarette aerosol [Quack RE: non-specific]

At the Electronic cigarette aerosol page you are currently engaging in edit war. QuackGuru (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

@QuackGuru:I'm not. I've made two reverts today, on two separate parts of the article. I made the first in three or four different edits to make it easier for the other users to check the individual aspects that had been changed but one revert in several edits is still one revert. You'll notice despite inclusions which should be removed per BRD I went to the talk page to ask others if they believed the remaining items, like the inclusion of "Designed to", should be reverted. This is because I am following policy and admin advice unlike others at the page. I would be careful what you accuse people of Quack. SPACKlick (talk) 20:42, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Yep, you made at least 2 reverts today.[9][10] Now three editors support including the sentence about PO. See Talk:Electronic cigarette aerosol#Sockpuppetry. QuackGuru (talk) 20:50, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
2 Edits is not an edit war. Quack, please stop trying to be antagonistic. I've been trying very hard to collaborate with you and you don't make that easy. I made two edits, in entirely different contexts and didn't re-revert anything. An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions. I have not done anything like that. I'll discuss PO on the page not here..SPACKlick (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
You previously deleted "Propylene glycol could produce propylene oxide when heated and aerosolized."[11]
Today you deleted "Propylene glycol could produce propylene oxide when heated and aerosolized."[12]
Is the text sourced? See "When heated and vaporized, propylene glycol can form propylene oxide, an International Agency for Research on Cancer class 2B carcinogen,69 and glycerol forms acrolein, which can cause upper respiratory tract irritation.70,71"[13]
To my shock there was a sock editing the article who was trying to skew consensus. The discussion was over IMO until the sock showed up. QuackGuru (talk) 23:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Stop with the "to my shock" facade Quack. Yes, there was a sock back. That doesn't change the validity of the arguments. The text was removed as no consensus. You re-added it as undoing the Sock's work however it wasn't the socks work it was removed. That was the bad edit. There's no edit war and don't try and pretend there is.SPACKlick (talk) 08:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
You removed the related link twice now.[14][15] I think the informative link benefits the reader. The reader may want to compare cigarette smoke to the aerosol. QuackGuru (talk) 17:24, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Stop spamming [CFCF re:e-cigs]

Please refrain from posting on my talk page with copied messages that bear no connection to the actions undertaken. I do not want to be spammed. Consensus is not created through:

  • User1 1: This is my proposal
  • User2: I agree, lets do that!
  • User3: I agree
  • User4: I don't like this
  • User4: I don't like this, it's horrible
  • User4: I don't like this at all, it is really bad
  • User4: This is horrible, end of the world, I will revert!

Drowning out others with more words or more messages isn't going to win you the discussion. I have made my point and it is clear in the talk page, so is the point of several other editors. Churning your dislike over and over again is just a waste of time. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 17:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

@CFCF: I see no instance of spamming. And I have not posted copied messages to your talk page.
The recent change has the following discussion
  • User 1 I reverted per BRD here's why
    • User 2 I disagree
  • User 3 Unbelievable to include it
    • User 2 and User 1 discuss detail
  • User 4 Does not belong
    • User 2 and User 4 discuss detail
      • User 0 points to a policy without saying why
  • User 5 disagrees with inclusion

There is clearly no consensus for inclusion, that has clearly not been spammed by one user. Get over yourself and edit per consensus and policy rather than your POV. You have made NO point on the talk page, your one post, in full is No, you're wrong. WP:HATNOTE with no context or content. You are WP:NOTHERE and your actions show that clearly.SPACKlick (talk) 17:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

hi [Ozzie10aaaa re:CFCF at AN:EW]

I don't know you or why you helped, but if you ever need a hand my door is open to you, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

I had been looking at this problem with this user on the page I pointed to and Domestic violence against men and been considering reporting, when I saw their name had already come up I figured I had to add. that said, I don't think your original report does constitute an edit war, but there may be some not listening on CFCF's part, I haven't looked in detail - SPACKlick (talk) 09:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
I thank you , in any event, sincerly--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:19, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Misused template

What exactly made you feel it necessary to leave me a message accusing me of making "unhelpful edits"? 179.210.105.123 (talk) 12:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, that template may not have been quite the right fit, however it was close. Leaving personal attacks, such as you have done at Chris Froome in edit summary's is unhelpful, calling others edits pointless in edit summaries is uncivil, lacks good faith and is also unhelpful. The reason I left the message was to say "Welcome to wikipedia, play nice." So play nice. I'd recommend taking the RedLink to David Kinjah to the talk page before the dispute becomes an edit war.SPACKlick (talk) 12:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
The template was an insult. It was a personal attack against me for making a clearly described sensible edit. Your implicit support for the editor who is repeatedly and disruptively reverting the change with no explanation at all is quite disgusting. 179.210.105.123 (talk) 12:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
No insult was intended and no attack was made. As can be seen from the fact that I advised all parties to stop reverting and discuss, and accepted your pending edit, I have not supported the reverting editor. I have also counselled that editor that their behaviour is likely leading to an edit war and dispute resolution steps should be attempted before further mainspace edits are made. Please try not to take talk page notices personally, they are advisories, usually on methods rather than contents. SPACKlick (talk) 13:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Whatever you intended, it was an insult and an attack. You have left no messages on the other user's talk page. Your intervention is entirely one sided.179.210.105.123 (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
I saw only one editor making personal attacks. I apologise if you feel it was an insult but I saw one pending edit, accepted the edit but posted a note to your talk page because that edit and one previous that caught my eye had nasty edit summaries. Following your message here I looked into the history of it and have mentioned to the other editors involved that they ought to be discussing on a talk page, that they ought not to edit war and have raised the matter at the project cycling board. I'm not sure which step in this you think was unreasonable. I would recommend stepping back, calming down and hopefully you'll see there's been no attack. Now to move this forward, I would recommend bringing the case that David Kinjah meets WP:GNG to the cycling board. SPACKlick (talk) 13:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
See Non-apology. You are not sure which step was unreasonable? How about the step where you blundered into a situation you hadn't bothered to research, and left a form letter to lie about me on my talk page? 179.210.105.123 (talk) 23:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm aware it was a non-apology. I have already said the template was imperfect, however you had made unhelpful edits, by their edit summaries, so it wasn't inappropriate. If you don't take talk messages personally and don't jump to ranting and playing the victim on other people's talk pages maybe you'll develop as an editor, work better collaboratively. Anyway, I'm done with this. I tried to be nice, I tried to get the ball moving towards dispute resolution. If you just wanna be angry at people please do it elsewhere. SPACKlick (talk) 07:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
you didn't try to "be nice". You deliberately weren't. You left a dishonest template to attack me for making a clearly described edit while encouraging the person reverting for no reason. If a template doesn't say what you want to say, don't use the template. If you don't want to be insulting, don't lie with a template and don't make pretend apologies. You approved of personal attacks and unexplained reverts but attacked me. You're a disgrace to the encyclopaedia and you should be ashamed of yourself. 179.210.105.123 (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Ok, some factual clarifications.

  1. I left you a welcome template rather than a warning template to be nice because it looked like a good editor who was frustrated rather than a bad editor in my reading of the edit summaries.
  2. The template was accurate but imperfect. You had in fact made unhelpful edits which had been reverted. By failing to discuss the disputed content on the talk page your later reversions were against policy, and thus unhelpful, the template didn't highlight what I thought was the most important aspect (the abusive edit summaries) but it was sufficient if imperfect.
  3. I made no encouragement of the other person reverting. I accepted your edit, looked into the matter further, talked to that user, encouraged that user to the appropriate venue and reported that user and you for edit warring. I'm not sure what in there you see as encouraging them.
  4. I have made no insults
  5. I have made no attacks
  6. I have made no false apology, nothing I have said that was not an apology was intended to be perceived as one.
  7. I have approved of no personal attacks
  8. I have approved of none of the reverts other than the first of yours. Had I seen more detailed history on the article I would not have approved of that one.

You have now made several borderline attacks against me so I'm going to give you some advice and then ignore anything further posted in the same vein. You have a point that David Kinjah may well be notable enough to warrant an article. If that is the case it is correct to redlink his name in the Froome article. However as the person proposing this you have an obligation to seek consensus for it when it is disputed. This is best acheived by providing reliable sources showing how Mr Kinjah meets the guideline on notability. After the first time your change was reverted the appropriate thing to do would be to raise in on the talk page with reasons. I have begun a thread to achieve that end at the wiki project cycling, to which I have linked you, but you haven't yet made any contribution to it. Go here and make your case. When you make your case, don't attack people and don't assume people who disagree with you or tell you you're making mistakes of process are attacking you. Assume people are trying to collaborate for a better wikipedia and help them with that. I really have tried to help here, it's not my problem you can't see that. Good-daySPACKlick (talk) 13:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Electronic cigarette [Arbcom notice]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Electronic cigarette and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks,—S Marshall T/C 17:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Currently it's quite scattershot with one sentence per source and little to no information flow from sentence to sentence so the average reader coming to look at e-cigarettes to see, for instance, whether or not to use them, will usually give up reading the article very quickly and will likely be none-the wiser as to what the known health effects are, what the likely health effects are and what the known and likely health benefits over smoking are. Some editors, particularly those from project medicine, seem to be aiming this article at medical readers rather than the average audience

I agree with this and want to add that most "average users" make their decision to continue reading or not in the lede, so the most focus on behalf of the layman/average reader should be there. The lede should invite the interested reader to continue reading. I would also like to try to break or curtail the use of the word "Electronic Cigarette" think that the phrase should be redirected to an article called "Vaping" or "Electronic Nicotine Delivery System", or similar. Vaping is not smoking. One thing I recently learned (directly from a local, real-life Vape Shop owner) is that while nicotine juice concentrations of 17% to 36% is common, it is possible to purchase 100% nicotine online. He then said that deaths have occurred with nicotine juice coming into direct contact with skin. So, while some people are trying to conflate vaping with smoking, and looking to force parallels between health effects of smoking and possible health effects of vaping (which may not even exist) the health effects of coming into direct contact with the vaping "juice" (particularly by children) may be completely ignored. While the article contorts itself around trying to inform the average reader about the health effects of inhaling nicotine vapor, children may be dying because they opened a bottle of nicotine juice and got it on their skin. Which seems much more important to me than trying to make some non-existent case that vaping can cause cancer. Nicotine juice on your skin can kill you. The article on vaping should mention this, and early in the article too. Save the political debate and the junk science for the lower-end of the article that most people never even read.

People are trying to make something that may not exist be where it is not, while ignoring something that does exist, and it's obviously right there. But no one sees it. This is just one example of how vaping is not smoking, and the consequences that can occur if people (editing the wikipedia article) do not have that level of awareness and sensitivity to the use of language. Mostly, I'd like to get all the editors involved OFF the idea that "smoking equals vaping, it's just a little bit different", and if thready studies trying to connect Welsh schoolchildren's ability to predict the likelihood of smoking based on whether or not they have ever tried vaping, then there should also be some effort to describe how likely it is for a smoker to quit smoking if they use vaping as a substitute or a transitional activity to quit nicotine completely. Maybe none of the editors have done either smoking or vaping. I've done both and have quit both for over 5 years, and am available as a resource in case the confusion between smoking and vaping continues.Jonny Quick (talk) 22:57, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

@Jonny Quick: Sorry Jonny, only just spotted this message now. I don't see a lot of confusion among editors on the vaping is like smoking but different front, but sadly all but a few researchers early on approached it that way. It's a defect of the sources rather than the editors where it still persists. That said I don't think the article overly suffers from it. If you could point out at the article talk page any specific areas of improvement I'm sure they'll be picked up on. SPACKlick (talk) 16:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

August x1
ArbCom case "Editor conduct in e-cigs articles" has now been opened

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 18, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

September x1
RFC (closing question)
I think it's ironic that you unarchived and closed a discussion about whether archived discussions should be closed. But since you did, let me suggest that you directly address the point for which there was a rough consensus: If someone decides that a discussion "needs" to have a closing statement slapped on it, then it needs to be unarchived first. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
unarchive and close those discussions editors feel merit such closing. Like that? SPACKlick (talk) 17:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Yes, exactly. Thank you for making the clarification so quickly. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Trouted (Quizzaciously)
Rainbow trout transparent.png Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Why are you deleting the article Quizzaciously claiming that it's a bad 'internet joke' while it exists in the Oxford Dictionary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCn8zs912OE Watch this video from 17.30

Andro498 (talk) 11:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Andro498

October x1
Arbitration proposed decision posted

A proposed decision has been posted in the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles arbitration case, which you are listed as a party to. Comments are welcome at the proposed decision talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 12:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

November x2
Help needed at DRN

You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Current Discussions[edit]

Mystery Wolff at AE

I have opened a section on Mystery Wolff at WP:AE here is a link [16] since you have been involved in the discussions I felt it was appropriate to notify you. AlbinoFerret 18:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Request for your feedback, on an AE regarding ECIG Articles.

Hello, you are a recent editor of Electronic Cigarettes, I am asking for your input to an Arbitration Enforcement Request AE. Found here. If you have time I would appreciate your input. The items in question are listed out 1-8. Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Mystery_Wolff
Thank you Mystery Wolff (talk) 03:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

I added more sources [AlbinoFerret:- Glantz Bias]
Hi SPACKlick

Since you were the only one who has replied to the RFC, I added more sources and arranged them in respect to sources about e-cigs. AlbinoFerret 20:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

WP:AE

I have opened a section on AE concerning edits and talk page sections you were involved in.[17] AlbinoFerret 18:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Clearly active and contentious RfCs should run for the full 30 days and be closed by an admin[edit]

I have reverted your close of Talk:Bernie_Sanders#Request_for_comments_--_religion_in_infobox. Clearly a contentious and important issue and RfC, which should run for the full 30 days and be closed only by an uninvolved WP:Administrator. Please do not attempt to close this again. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 10:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Whoops I misread the date there Thought it had been open since 3rd January. That said, any uninvolved editor may close an RFC and while 30 days is the default time an editor may close them earlier where appropriate, see WP:RFC. Simply reverting the close is not the appropriate way to challenge an RFC closure, see WP:CLOSE. I'm happy to hear an argument for why this RFC for which the policy and sourcing is clear shouldn't be closed now before I re-insert the close. SPACKlick (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
So far 14 editors, many of them with years of experience, strongly disagree with your assertion that "the policy and sourcing is clear" (meaning "clearly on the support side"). So far 16 agree with you but two of them base their arguments on a logical fallacy and will almost certainly have their !votes discarded by a fair and uninvolved closer. What you are attempting to do is to ignore the lack of consensus and cast a supervote based upon your opinion rather than fairly judging the consensus. This is a hotly debated RfC and is definitely a poor candidate for a non-admin close. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
It's not a vote, the 16/14 was irrelevant. Looking at those people who have made arguments;The relevant policy BLPCat isn't disputed. No cogent argumenns have been made that his press packet is not sufficient evidence of self identification.
There is a separate ongoing RFC about whether or not the religion paramater need be filled when it's not overly important in the persons life. That decision will be made there and so isn't currently a policy based argument for ignoring here.
The arguments against are that ethnic jew =/= religious jew. Which is perfectly true but here we have self identification as a religious jew. We have a washington post story where he says he doesn't participate in organised religion. But that isn't saying he's not a religious Jew.
My point is, I read the arguments, saw that most of the recent posts were repeat input from people arguing with eachother rather than about the topic and found that the arguments for inclusion have a much stronger case and more wide reaching support. Consensus and policy went in that direction. It's not a supervote it's a reading of consensus. When people don't make arguments in an RFC their opinion is worth less to the closer than those who do. SPACKlick (talk) 14:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
I read the exact same arguments and found that the arguments against inclusion have a much stronger case and more wide reaching support. Please explain why your judgement supersedes my judgement. Again, it has long been a Wikipedia policy that when we editors have this sort of disagreement that neither prevails but instead the closing is done by an administrator. Would you like me to post a question an WP:AN and have the admins tell you that this is not a good RfC for a non-admin closing? --Guy Macon (talk) 15:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Per policy, your involvement. You are involved in the topic, you are one of the people having a fight rather than presenting, refuting or questioning arguments on the RFC. This is not a hotly debated RFC it's a slanging match. Exactly the sort of RFC that should have an early closure. You can post a question at AN if you so desire. I have not closed again yet and am giving softlavender time to respond. SPACKlick (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

RFC's[edit]

2014
August 2014
Talk:Latrodectus

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Latrodectus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
ISO 8601

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:ISO 8601. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

OpenOffice.org

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:OpenOffice.org. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Scientific Opinion on Climate Change

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Scientific opinion on climate change. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Earthquake prediction

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Earthquake prediction. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Shooting of Michael Brown

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Shooting of Michael Brown. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

OpenOffice.Org

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:OpenOffice.org. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

BostonScribe/Sandbox

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onUser talk:Bostonscribe/sandbox. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Ebola Virus Epidemice

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

White People

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:White people. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Article Titles

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onWikipedia talk:Article titles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Ice Bucket Challenge

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Ice Bucket Challenge. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Ed Milliband

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Ed Miliband. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Shooting of Michael Brown

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Shooting of Michael Brown. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

List of Extinct Mammals

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:List of extinct mammals. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

South Yemen

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:South Yemen. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Ashok Chakra Award

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Ashok Chakra Award. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Nofel Izz

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Nofel Izz. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Tom Paulin

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Tom Paulin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Kiger Mustang

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Kiger Mustang. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Veteran Intelligence Progessionals for Sanity

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Neil deGrasse Tyson

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Neil deGrasse Tyson. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Artificial Intelligence

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Artificial intelligence. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Richard O’Dwyer

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Richard O'Dwyer. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Ebola Virus Epidemic

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Comics

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Nazi Party

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Nazi Party. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Origin of the Romanians

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Origin of the Romanians. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Alex Jones(Radio host)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Alex Jones (radio host). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Julian Calendar

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Julian calendar. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Gender-neutral language

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onWikipedia talk:Gender-neutral language. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Artificial Intelligence

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Artificial intelligence. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Joni Ernst

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Joni Ernst. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Ebola Virus in the USA

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:2014 Ebola virus cases in the United States. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

2014 Military intervention against ISIS

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:2014 military intervention against ISIS. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Environmental impact of hydraulic fracturing

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Environmental impact of hydraulic fracturing. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Efforts to impeach Barack Obama

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Efforts to impeach Barack Obama. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

United States

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:United States. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Metacompiler

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Metacompiler. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Labour Party (UK)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Labour Party (UK). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Terrirotial disputes in the South China Sea

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Territorial disputes in the South China Sea. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Arctic sea ice decline

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Arctic sea ice decline. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

hanging canals of southeastern arizona

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Prehistoric Bajada "hanging" canals of southeastern Arizona. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

epilepsy

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Epilepsy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

USA Pro Life Movement

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:United States pro-life movement. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

The Zeitgeist Movement

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:The Zeitgeist Movement. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Two envelopes problem

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Two envelopes problem. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Climate change denial

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Climate change denial. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Dragon Warrior

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Dragon Warrior. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Artificial intelligence

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Artificial intelligence. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

100-gigabit Ethernet

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:100-gigabit Ethernet. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Electronic cigarette

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Artificial intelligence

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Artificial intelligence. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Electronic cigarette

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Chinese as a foreign language

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Chinese as a foreign language. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

2014 Winter Olympics opening ceremony

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:2014 Winter Olympics opening ceremony. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
2014 Hong Kong protests

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:2014 Hong Kong protests. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Ayurveda

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Ayurveda. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Electronic cigarette

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Electronic cigarette

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Dental amalgam toxicity

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Dental amalgam toxicity. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

PATH (Toronto)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:PATH (Toronto). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Vagina

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Vagina. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Electronic cigarette

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Electronic cigarette

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Climate engineering

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Climate engineering. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Robert Peter Gale

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Robert Peter Gale. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Punjabi language

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Punjabi language. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Ukraine

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Ukraine. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

United States same-sex marriage map

I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas: RfC: How should we color Kansas? Prcc27 (talk) 10:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Boletus edulis

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Boletus edulis. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Calcium

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Calcium. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Light bulb (disambiguation)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Light bulb (disambiguation). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

2012 Benghazi attack

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:2012 Benghazi attack. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Hong Kong 1 July marches

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Hong Kong 1 July marches. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Operation Zarb-e-Azb

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Operation Zarb-e-Azb. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

List of wars involving the United States

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of wars involving the United States. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Template talk:Medicine navs

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Medicine navs. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Watergate scandal

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Watergate scandal. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Objectivity/DB

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Objectivity/DB. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Six-Day War

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Six-Day War. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:2014 Jerusalem synagogue massacre

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 Jerusalem synagogue massacre. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Hands up, don't shoot

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hands up, don't shoot. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Education

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Education. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Axis powers

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Axis powers. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Oseltamivir

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Oseltamivir. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:SupremeSAT(Pvt.)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:SupremeSAT(Pvt.). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:List of ethnic slurs

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of ethnic slurs. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Nibiru cataclysm

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nibiru cataclysm. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:List of literary awards

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of literary awards. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:River Soar

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:River Soar. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Nibiru cataclysm

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nibiru cataclysm. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Category talk:Executioners

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Executioners. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Montgomery County, Pennsylvania shootings

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Montgomery County, Pennsylvania shootings. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Euclidean algorithm

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Euclidean algorithm. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Electronic cigarette

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Bonobo

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bonobo. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Terrorism

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Terrorism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Satyananda Saraswati

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Satyananda Saraswati. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Electronic cigarette

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Hamas

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hamas. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Astrophysics

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Astrophysics. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Governor-General of Australia

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Governor-General of Australia. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Rotimi Amaechi

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rotimi Amaechi. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

2015
January 2015
Talk:2014 hostage rescue operations in Yemen

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 hostage rescue operations in Yemen. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Orson Scott Card

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Orson Scott Card. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:America: Imagine the World Without Her

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:America: Imagine the World Without Her. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:History of India

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:History of India. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:G. Edward Griffin

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Sweet Home 3D

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sweet Home 3D. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Mobile, Alabama

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mobile, Alabama. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:73 (number)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:73 (number). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Islamic calendar

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Islamic calendar. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Same-sex marriage in the United States

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Same-sex marriage in the United States. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Template talk:Armed Iraqi groups in the Iraq War and the Iraq Civil War

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Armed Iraqi groups in the Iraq War and the Iraq Civil War. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Creation–evolution controversy

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation–evolution controversy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:David Kay

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:David Kay. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Mustang

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mustang. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Steve Scalise

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Steve Scalise. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Bhutanese passport

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bhutanese passport. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Template talk:Prostitution in Canada

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Prostitution in Canada. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Mexicans of European descent

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mexicans of European descent. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Campus rape

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Campus rape. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Hydraulic fracturing

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hydraulic fracturing. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Autism

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Autism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:List of American federal politicans convicted of crimes

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of American federal politicans convicted of crimes. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Libertarianism

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Libertarianism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Indigenous Aryans

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Indigenous Aryans. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:American Left

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:American Left. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Half-mast

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Half-mast. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Talk:International Space Station

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:International Space Station. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Azure

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Azure. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Big data

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Big data. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Korean language

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Korean language. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Altaic languages

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Altaic languages. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Japonic languages

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Japonic languages. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Japonic languages

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Japonic languages. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Lizabeth Scott

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lizabeth Scott. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Bhutanese passport

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bhutanese passport. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Ken Ham

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ken Ham. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Abraham Lincoln

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Abraham Lincoln. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Julian calendar

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Julian calendar. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Ag-gag

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ag-gag. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Joseph Kobzon

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Joseph Kobzon. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Lloviu virus

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lloviu virus. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Somalis in the United Kingdom

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Somalis in the United Kingdom. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Somalis in the United Kingdom

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Somalis in the United Kingdom. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Neo-feudalism

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Neo-feudalism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Template talk:Largest cities of Israel

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Largest cities of Israel. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Misnomer

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Misnomer. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Winged unicorn

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Winged unicorn. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Robert Kagan

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Robert Kagan. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Talk:Columbia Township, Lorain County, Ohio

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Columbia Township, Lorain County, Ohio. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:2015 in spaceflight

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2015 in spaceflight. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:2 May 2014 Odessa clashes

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2 May 2014 Odessa clashes. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Template talk:Infobox officeholder

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Anwar Ibrahim

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anwar Ibrahim. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Einstein Cross

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Einstein Cross. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Lift (force)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lift (force). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Syngenta

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syngenta. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Liberty

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Liberty. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Army Ranger Wing

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Army Ranger Wing. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Cyclone Pam

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cyclone Pam. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Stephen Cambone

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stephen Cambone. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Winnipeg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Winnipeg. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Foie gras

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foie gras. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:E-meter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:E-meter. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Higgs boson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Higgs boson. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:1692 Subbotina

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1692 Subbotina. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Fremantle Prison

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fremantle Prison. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Kokuchūkai

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kokuchūkai. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Talk:Nazi Germany

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nazi Germany. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Proper noun
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Proper noun. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Tensor

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tensor. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Aaron Schock

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aaron Schock. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Hapa

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hapa. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Brown rice

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brown rice. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:The male gaze

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The male gaze. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Agatha Barbara

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Agatha Barbara. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Traian Vuia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Traian Vuia. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Campus rape

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Campus rape. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Talk:Cold War II

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Lokiarchaeota

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lokiarchaeota. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Richie Farmer
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richie Farmer. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Acupuncture
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Acupuncture. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Data comparison
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Data comparison. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Supercarrier
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Supercarrier. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Template talk:H:IPA

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:H:IPA. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Talk:Ask.com

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ask.com. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Steve Jobs

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Steve Jobs. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Ayurveda

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ayurveda. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:E-meter

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:E-meter. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Hillary Clinton

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Soka Gakkai

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Soka Gakkai. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Ramadan

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ramadan. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Talk:Tony Abbott

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tony Abbott. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Copyfraud

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Copyfraud. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Dennis Hastert

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dennis Hastert. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Brian Leiter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brian Leiter. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Derry

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Derry. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Veganism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Veganism. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Carlos Latuff

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carlos Latuff. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:The Pirate Bay

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Pirate Bay. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Jeb Bush

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeb Bush. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Geology of Pluto

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Geology of Pluto. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Talk:Plant-based diet

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Plant-based diet. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Antikyra

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antikyra. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Israel

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Snježana Kordić

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Snježana Kordić. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Rick Perry

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rick Perry. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Cuban Thaw

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cuban Thaw. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Miss Cleo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Miss Cleo. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Type 054A frigate

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Type 054A frigate. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:GJ 1214 b

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:GJ 1214 b. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Operation Onymous

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Operation Onymous. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Trypophobia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trypophobia. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Quds Day

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quds Day. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:India

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:India. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Talk:Scanian dialect

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Scanian dialect. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Phineas Gage
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Phineas Gage. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Template talk:Cite doi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Cite doi. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Faith healing

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Faith healing. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Hijra

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hijra. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Idolatry

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Idolatry. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Nuclear weapon

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nuclear weapon. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:The Pirate Bay

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Pirate Bay. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Mizrahi Jews

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mizrahi Jews. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:State of Palestine

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:State of Palestine. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Liberland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Liberland. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Firefox for mobile

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Firefox for mobile. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Carly Fiorina

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Palestine

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Palestine. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:C/1980 E1

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:C/1980 E1. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Homo naledi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Homo naledi. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Talk:United Nations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United Nations. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Talk:United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Carly Fiorina
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Metapolitefsi
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Metapolitefsi. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Vani Hari
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vani Hari. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Frank Gaffney
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Frank Gaffney. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Domestic violence
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Domestic violence. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk:OpenIndiana
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:OpenIndiana. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Monarchy of India
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monarchy of India. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Intifada
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Intifada. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
Talk:Cold War II
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Wales Green Party
There is a discussion at Talk:Green Party of England and Wales#Should Wales Green Party become a standalone article? to establish if Wales Green Party (which currently redirects to a section inside Green Party of England and Wales) is notable enough to be restored as a standalone article. As you either took part in the AfD, or are a significant contributor to either Wales Green Party or Green Party of England and Wales, you are being contacted to see if you have input to the discussion. SilkTork ✔Tea time 16:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Wikipediocracy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wikipediocracy. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Martina Anderson
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Martina Anderson. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Template talk:Caliphate
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Caliphate. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Alpha Centauri Bb
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alpha Centauri Bb. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Talk:2015
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Cold War II
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Talk:War in Donbass
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:War in Donbass. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Fields Medal
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fields Medal. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Phaedrus (dialogue)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Phaedrus (dialogue). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Carly Fiorina
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
December 2015
Talk:Ben Carson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ben Carson. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Glyphosate

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Glyphosate. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Frankfurt School

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Frankfurt School. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Purple drank

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Purple drank. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:CobraNet
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:CobraNet. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:PolitiFact.com
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:PolitiFact.com. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Séralini affair
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Séralini affair. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Gilles-Éric Séralini
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gilles-Éric Séralini. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Séralini affair
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Séralini affair. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ayurveda
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ayurveda. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Dodge Tomahawk
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dodge Tomahawk. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Global cooling
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Global cooling. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ayurveda
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ayurveda. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Borderline personality disorder
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Borderline personality disorder. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:ExxonMobil
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ExxonMobil. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Séralini affair
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Séralini affair. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Monkey Kingdom
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monkey Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:F.C.E. 365 Firmware Manager
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:F.C.E. 365 Firmware Manager. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Help talk:IPA for English
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Help talk:IPA for English. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Political correctness
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political correctness. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Canada-related articles
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Canada-related articles. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ethnocracy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ethnocracy. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Spanish general election, 2015
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Spanish general election, 2015. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Socialism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Socialism. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Woman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Woman. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:IPAc-en

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:IPAc-en. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox medical condition

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox medical condition. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Human spaceflight

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Human spaceflight. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Salt Mud Slide
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Salt Mud Slide. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:ExxonMobil
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ExxonMobil. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Veganism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Veganism. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Marco Rubio
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marco Rubio. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of earthquakes in 2016
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of earthquakes in 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Electronic cigarette

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:The Communist Manifesto

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Communist Manifesto. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Mitsubishi Magna

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mitsubishi Magna. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Holocene extinction

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Holocene extinction. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Climate change denial

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Climate change denial. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:List of the oldest living state leaders

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of the oldest living state leaders. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Prices

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Prices. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Jeremy Corbyn

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorcycling/Conventions

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorcycling/Conventions. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Overlapping circles grid

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Overlapping circles grid. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Higgs boson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Higgs boson. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Planet Nine

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Planet Nine. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Child abuse

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Child abuse. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Gun laws in Illinois

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gun laws in Illinois. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Edmonson County High School

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Edmonson County High School. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Template talk:Infobox

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Housing in the United Kingdom

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Housing in the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Freedom Caucus[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Freedom Caucus. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Israel[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Comedy of the commons[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Comedy of the commons. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rafik Yousef[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rafik Yousef. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of current state leaders by date of assumption of office[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of current state leaders by date of assumption of office. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mary Katharine Ham[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mary Katharine Ham. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cold War II[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ontario Civil Liberties Association[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ontario Civil Liberties Association. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lone wolf (terrorism)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lone wolf (terrorism). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Star Alliance[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Star Alliance. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:FlightGear[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:FlightGear. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fajr decade[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fajr decade. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Human sexuality[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Human sexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:History of IBM CKD Controllers[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of IBM CKD Controllers. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Socialism[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Socialism. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stack Overflow[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stack Overflow. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Avoiding dangerous climate change[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Avoiding dangerous climate change. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Israeli lira[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israeli lira. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:English Democrats[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:English Democrats. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:PBB[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:PBB. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Corporal punishment[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Corporal punishment. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Deepak Chopra[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Deepak Chopra. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gibraltar sovereignty referendum, 2002[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gibraltar sovereignty referendum, 2002. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Australian head of state dispute[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Australian head of state dispute. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marco Rubio[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marco Rubio. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Federal Way Public Academy[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Federal Way Public Academy. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2016 U.S.–Iran naval incident[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 U.S.–Iran naval incident. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Vladimir Putin[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vladimir Putin. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Compulsory sterilization[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Compulsory sterilization. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Australian head of state dispute[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Australian head of state dispute. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1 metre[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1 metre. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Exponential function[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Exponential function. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jeb Bush[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeb Bush. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Engineering[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Engineering. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alt-right[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alt-right. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Schulze method[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Schulze method. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Media coverage of the Ted Cruz extramarital affairs allegation[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Media coverage of the Ted Cruz extramarital affairs allegation. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Domestic violence[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Domestic violence. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:Beautifulpeoplelikeyou/sandbox[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:Beautifulpeoplelikeyou/sandbox. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ford Pinto[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ford Pinto. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:MDMA[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MDMA. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Order of approximation[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Order of approximation. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sex offender registries in the United States[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sex offender registries in the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

DRN help needed and volunteer roll call[edit]

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.

First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.

Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:National Rifle Association[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Genocides in history[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Genocides in history. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Flag of Northern Ireland[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Flag of Northern Ireland. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:MMR vaccine controversy[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MMR vaccine controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sudden infant death syndrome[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sudden infant death syndrome. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:American Petroleum Institute[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American Petroleum Institute. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Cruz[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Cruz. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Psychology sidebar[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Psychology sidebar. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pantomime[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pantomime. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Need help[edit]

We need more neutral opinions here. I've followed instructions here and at Wikipedia:Feedback request service and to used the user lists there. I've sent a message for neutral input to everyone active recently and available for 10 per month or more on the lists in the Language and linguistics, Media, the arts, and architecture, Society-sports-culture, Unsorted and All-RFCs lists, none of whom have interacted with me before, that I can remember. Have done my best to act in good faith to try to get more neutral opinions. Please help! Thanx! SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:ExxonMobil climate change controversy[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ExxonMobil climate change controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:State of Palestine[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:State of Palestine. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Panini (sandwich)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Panini (sandwich). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Second law of thermodynamics[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Second law of thermodynamics. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jean Lapierre[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jean Lapierre. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:YouTube[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:YouTube. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Area of a disk[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Area of a disk. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Korea-related articles[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Korea-related articles. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jeremy Searle[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Searle. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eidetic memory[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eidetic memory. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Iran[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United Kingdom general election, 2015[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United Kingdom general election, 2015. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States Senate elections, 2016[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States Senate elections, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Recall of MPs Act 2015[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Recall of MPs Act 2015. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Republic of Venice[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Republic of Venice. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kosher tax (antisemitic canard)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kosher tax (antisemitic canard). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2016 U.S.–Iran naval incident[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 U.S.–Iran naval incident. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:World Wide Web[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:World Wide Web. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Microbiology[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Microbiology. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Common law[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Common law. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jerusalem[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jerusalem. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Giraffe[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Giraffe. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Garden of Eden (cellular automaton)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Garden of Eden (cellular automaton). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Smartbond[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Smartbond. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Lists[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Lists. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lone wolf (terrorism)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lone wolf (terrorism). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Isaac Barrow[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Isaac Barrow. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Genetically modified organisms[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Genetically modified organisms. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Genetically modified organisms[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Genetically modified organisms. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:YouTube[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:YouTube. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Stuart Mill[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Stuart Mill. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alfred North Whitehead[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alfred North Whitehead. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rojava[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rojava. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rojava[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rojava. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:President of Brazil[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:President of Brazil. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2016 Orlando nightclub shooting[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 Orlando nightclub shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:At-will employment[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:At-will employment. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stop Trump movement[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in th