User talk:SWalton91

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Plaintext Players.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI) 16:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Plaintext Players[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Plaintext Players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —teb728 t c 20:15, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, SWalton91. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by xanchester (t) 21:10, 28 October 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

Your doing well if you "completely" understand!! :-)

Glad your happy!

Ariconte (talk) 01:08, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I think perhaps my use of the "completely" was a bit optimistic but i'm learning! SWalton91 (talk) 01:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

tb[edit]

Hello, SWalton91. You have new messages at PamD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, SWalton91. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by xanchester (t) 11:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Award[edit]

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		Congratulations on creating and expanding your very first article! Keep up the good work.xanchester (t) 01:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Plaintext Players concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Plaintext Players, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Plaintext Players[edit]

Hello SWalton91. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Plaintext Players".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Plaintext Players}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oliver Senton has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oliver Senton. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oliver Senton (September 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It's not clear if any reliable sources show that this subject has received significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oliver Senton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oliver Senton, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 11:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SWalton91! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Salimfadhley (talk) 11:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oliver Senton has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oliver Senton. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oliver Senton has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oliver Senton. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oliver Senton (April 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft has good potential and has improved significantly, however the references still require proper formatting: please see referencing for beginners and WP:CITE. Please amend them accordingly before resubmitting; and ping me and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oliver Senton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oliver Senton, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 05:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]