User talk:Sagitt1989
August 2024
[edit]
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
- Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
- Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Sagitt1989 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
There is nothing promotional in the content, Please read it carefully, neither i have been paid for it, I am a individual who has started writing for Wikipedia and noticed that this firm is a part of global network and high potential firm that needs to be showcased to mass audience, I haven't included or written who is promotional or which is violating the Wikipedia guidelines , there are many reliable sources that are talking about this firm in the google. I believe, this information that i have written about firm will be very useful for the readers, since this firm is the member of Andersen Global which is a multinational company. Requesting to unblock my account so that i can contribute to mass panels.
Decline reason:
This does nothing to convince me you have no conflict of interest (WP:COI) with regard to this company. I think there's a strong likelihood you are indeed employed by them or they are a client of yours. You haven't attempted to address this so there's no possibility of your block being lifted at this time. Yamla (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sagitt1989 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like to respectfully clarify that I have not engaged in any form of paid advocacy or promotional activities on Wikipedia. My contributions have always been made with the intention of improving the quality and accuracy of the content on the platform. I am deeply committed to Wikipedia's mission of providing free and reliable information to the public. The accusation that I have a financial stake in the topics I have edited is unfounded. To my knowledge, I have not received any compensation or incentives for my contributions. Any edits made were done based on available verifiable sources, with the sole purpose of enhancing the informational value of the articles. I understand the importance of transparency and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines. If there have been any inadvertent errors or misunderstandings regarding my edits, and, i am more than willing to rectify them and ensure full compliance with the platform's policies. I am committed to disclosing any potential conflicts of interest in the future to prevent any further misunderstandings.
- kindly request that you review my account again Sagitt1989 (talk) 18:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Except for the last line, this request was written by an AI(100% certain according to GPTZero). We want to hear from you, not an AI as you are the one blocked, not the AI. Please write in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 22:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please be very clear. Are you employed by Nangia Andersen? Are you employed by Andersen Global? Are either of those companies clients of yours? --Yamla (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- One more question. What exactly is your relationship to those two companies? --Yamla (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Sagitt1989 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
No, I am not employed by Nangia Andersen or Andersen Global, nor do I work with any agencies or have them as clients. I have no relationship with these two companies. Even, i have just started writing for Wikipedia and you guys, instead of supporting me, discouraged at initial moment. Even, before start writing, i have gone researched and gone through each and every policy of wiki then only, i started with my first work. My reason for choosing this firm is that I've heard a lot about their collaboration in India and felt proud of this Indian company making a name internationally. When I searched for information about them on Wikipedia and found none, I decided to contribute. I wanted to provide valuable information to the public about their achievements and contributions. My intention was purely to inform and share the success story of Nangia Andersen with a wider audience. I believed that adding this information to Wikipedia would help highlight the accomplishments of an Indian firm on the global stage. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Trust me, my contributions were made in good faith, with no financial gain or ulterior motive involved. My goal was to just enrich the content available to the public and celebrate a noteworthy achievement.
Decline reason:
Please only make one unblock request at a time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:36, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.