User talk:Salvio giuliano/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Italian Criminal Procedure article[edit]

Ciao, Salvio. I made some minor changes in the lead. Plese make sure I didn't srew up any essentials. Thanks, The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and really good first article[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Salvio giuliano, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Red King (talk) 22:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

and your first article is impressive! --Red King (talk) 22:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corte d'Assise[edit]

The article Corte d'Assise is asking for an expert to review it for accuracy. If you feel so inclined, would you please do so? --Red King (talk) 23:05, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Salvio, thank you very much for the award. Yesterday I was in very low spirits regarding this article and Wikipedia in general (because of this article). I appreciate the fact that you have always been very supportive of my attempts to cut through some of the misinformation and that you have been always diligent in bringing the Italian language sources to our attention. However, it has sometimes felt very lonely on that talk page! In the last day, several people have come out on the side of neutrality (and maybe they were there all the time but just keeping quiet) so suddenly things look a lot more optimistic. The barnstar is the final thing that has really "made my day". Thanks again! Bluewave (talk) 16:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Judiciary of Italy.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Judiciary of Italy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Fred the Oyster (talk) 17:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rudy Guede appeal[edit]

Hi Salvio. When Guede's appeal concluded, last December, he is quoted (at least in The Guardian) as saying that he would be mounting a second appeal. I've been trying trying to work out whether this was just bravado, or whether he can and will actually do so. I read through Italian Criminal Procedure and it sounds as though he could appeal to the Court of Cassation. The article about that court seems to say that people can only appeal on points of law if, for example, a lower court has not followed the the legal process correctly. It has struck me throughout this case that, with the world's media watching them, the courts seem to have gone out of their way to do everything "by the book" (despite what some US senators may claim!) So, I came to the conclusion that Guede has very little hope of grounds for a second appeal. I would appreciate your comments on whether I have understood this correctly. Many thanks. Bluewave (talk) 18:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply! Bluewave (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A little thank you[edit]

Thanks for somehow backing up my allegations against Z. at ANI. Since she picked me as the leader of a non-existing conspiracy group, you know that you're part of it in her mind (like everybody else who doesn't share her views or better said, feelings about the case). Let me leave you something for dessert (it looks strange but it is Tiramisu and quite tasty ;) ). Best, The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 21:39, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, TMC-k! By the way, you chose one of my favourite desserts (the other one is profiterole...)! ;) Salvio giuliano (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy (message) 23:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why did you put <nowiki>?Tommy (message) 23:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She began a table, I just wanted to show it, because she was accusing me of "censoring" her. You can call me Salvio (talk) 23:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry for intruding then. Tommy (message) 23:17, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry; and, anyway, your opinion would be much valued, if you wished to comment on the issue... ;) You can call me Salvio (talk) 23:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Angus MacNeil[edit]

Please provide references for the revert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.12.115.218 (talk) 00:14, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Hey, I think you made a little error here. Don't sweat it -- we all make mistakes. Best, 76.230.9.183 (talk) 02:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oooops, I'm sorry! Thanks for being understanding. ^_______^ You can call me Salvio (talk) 02:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contact high.[edit]

Despite warnings and advice, this IP address continues to edit war. Any suggestions? - Zhang He (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No need anymore... He was blocked for 24 hrs... ^___^ You can call me Salvio (talk) 18:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Labour Party[edit]

is this how i talk to you i duno sorry. i just really dislike labour party there ruining britain you have got to understand maybe it was a bit immature but yeah sorry

Here you can write whatever you want (even insults... ^_________^) and no one will complain.You can call me Salvio (talk) 21:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE-Thanks[edit]

Non c'è di che ;) --Jargon ๏̯͡๏) 07:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Meredith Kercher talkpage[edit]

In case you missed it, Zlykinskyja made several edits (starting here[1]) last night re-factoring and changing her comments against talk page guidelines so you might want to check if you feel that your responses are still in the context you intended.The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 14:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I'll remove my comments altogether. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 15:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bing search engine[edit]

That's true, I added a non-neutral point of view. Why, though, did you not delete the previous sentence, which was precisely as non-neutral? Are you neutral? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.232.191.16 (talk) 14:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is a quote and it is sourced; if you wish to criticize Google's hypocrisy, please find a reliable source; do not put your opinions in the text, please. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 14:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Salvio giuliano. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English.
Message added 15:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jac16888Talk 15:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Closing a discussion (don't know)[edit]

I'm afraid I can't help with suggestions of how to close the discussion on the NPOV board. Looking at the archive, it seems as though a few threads get marked with a {{Resolved}} tag, but most just languish on the page until they are eventually auto-archived. I think you're right that the NPOV page has actually made it more difficult to resolve issues rather than easier. I have edited hundreds (maybe a slight exaggeration) of articles and this is the first one where I've seen the use of the NPOV noticeboard (no help), Wikiquette noticeboard (no help either) or AN/I (even less help). I wonder if Z's appeal for mediation will provide the magical solution to our problems (not holding my breath). Cheers. Bluewave (talk) 14:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not holding my breath either. And I'm flabbergasted by the excess of bureaucracy we've gone through to no avail. Let's hope mediation will help move things along. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 15:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

jonahs coments on the wiki[edit]

okaay i wanted to say im sorry i just love lego dont ban me from the wiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.230.34 (talk) 21:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about that. But just try to edit in a useful manner in the future. ^___________^ Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 21:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC) im the one who edited ole kirk christinsen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.230.34 (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC) oh and sign all of those coments jonah okay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.230.34 (talk) 21:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Yep, I know.

If you wish, you could help expand his article, using a neutral point of view and reliable sources, thereby doing a service both to Wikipedia and to Ole. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 21:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)okay salvio sign all of my comments jonah k?[reply]
It's not I, but it's a Bot that signs your comments; you also could choose to create an account, to call Jonah. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 21:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

okay!im 11 years old —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.230.34 (talk) 21:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC) i did it i made my acount thank you salvio! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonah legofan (talk • contribs) 22:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 22:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)sorry for the mass pming--Jonah legofan (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello?--Jonah legofan (talk) 22:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I'm a little busy patrolling recent changes to avoid vandalism... ^_______^ Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 22:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC) oh sorry--Jonah legofan (talk) 22:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Ibong Adarna[edit]

Why did you revert my attempts to save this otherwise horrible article? 68.153.29.23 (talk) 00:16, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you erased lots of text and I assumed it was vandalism; if it wasn't, I'm sorry: go on and pretend I did not interfere... ^____^ Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 00:18, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your warnings[edit]

Hi Salvio, when giving out warnings like this one please don't replace a user's talk page with the warning. Simply make a new (typically Month Year) section and place the warning. There is no reason to remove a user's welcome simply because some test edits have been made or they haven't been falling entirely in-line with policy. Thanks for monitoring changes, Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 00:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how I erased it: it wasn't my intention... Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 00:21, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Correction: I see what happened now. Anyway, you would benefit from using an edit summary so we all know what's going on. You keep showing up in some of my bot reports because of the automatic edit summary "replaced content with". Anyway, thanks and keep up the good work! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 00:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Aside for that time — where I had chosen the wrong template —, I don't know how I can add an edit summary: Lupin rollbacks, without giving me time to add it... Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 00:26, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No worries about rollbacks as those edit summaries are always automatically generated. But when you do something manually, try to add in an edit summary just to describe what you're doing. Aside from helping others, it has, on occasion, even reminded myself of what I was trying to do! Thanks again, Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 00:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, got it. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 00:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Salvio_giuliano/Archive_1&oldid=1141036015"