User talk:Samkay4000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

January 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Fail Blog has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 10:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:Shadowjams. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 10:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Shadowjams. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Anna Lincoln 10:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Shadowjams. Anna Lincoln 10:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


It's more effective if you put your insults at the bottom of someone's talk page. When you just edit the other comments on my page it just makes me, or others, revert them. That's no fun. If you want me to see them then put them at the bottom. If you're lucky, or have some wit, we might keep them. I've kept a few that have made me laugh out loud. I think that's truly rewarding. Anyway, you're probably going to get banned, but in the future, you know, we're all just people here. If you want to make us laugh we will. Just don't be annoying. It's annoying. It's more fun if we're all interesting. cheers. Shadowjams (talk) 11:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I admire your wit, and I take this as a challenge...

Stop x nuvola.svg
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Don't take what I said the wrong way. Typically people with wit tend to be pretty smart, and tend to stick around. I find the "xxx is a homo" edits the most obnoxious, but I don't see you doing that. I think you're probably beyond that. A lot of good people start out messing around, and then find it interesting, and then get hooked. If you're not into it, that's cool. But if you are, and you want some advice about how to help out, let me know. Shadowjams (talk) 11:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)