This user has autoconfirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
Email this user
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:Samuell1616

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Samuell1616's talk page!

I am Happy to help anytime you need me... just keep a check on these when leaving me a message :

  • Please stay civil. Any rudeness on this page I will remove at my discretion. You are happy to add your message again if it does not violate this rule
  • No personal attacks. I will not tolerate any personal attacks. They will be removed on sight and will be treated as vandalism.
  • Assume good faith. If I have erred, do not hesitate to tell me.
  • If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
  • If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{talkback|Samuell1616}} on your talk.

Note: Please start a new talk page thread either by clicking the New section link above or using the box below. This will make sure that the edit summary that appears on watchlists accurately shows your edit as a new topic, and not related to another topic. Thank you.

    Post a new message    

Exquisite-folder font.pngArchives
Threads older than seven days after the last reply will be archived..
•1 • 2


A gummi bear holding a sign that says "Thank you"
Thank you for using VisualEditor and sharing your ideas with the developers.

Hello, Samuell1616,

The Editing team is asking very experienced editors like you for your help with VisualEditor. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Unsubscribe from this list Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletterTranslate the user guide

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

About external links[edit]

hi i seen some links got removed from Unique World Records article from external links like official facebook page, twitter page etc but the same existing on the page of Guinness World Records, see link if possible please add same for Unique World Records as Wikipedia is transparent and its rules would be same for all, and if there is no policy for external links same should be removed from Guinness World Records article too, i am unable to find exact policy of Wiki on some pages some info is existing but same can be deleted from others why please clarify, i want to get more and more knowledge please try to help me friend. Thanks, Rinku Maurya — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rinkumaurya (talkcontribs) 01:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@Rinkumaurya: Thanks, removed irrelevant links from the referred page too, external links are also one form of information supports with reference to the article. The reason for removing excessive links from unique records was it was not adding further information but used more as promotion - for example the google plus page , twitter page, Facebook page hardly have any activity or information. The relevant one were untouched like the official website and the national record website. The thumb rule is to provide relevant information not add clutter to the article. hope that clarifies the doubt. Also you have wrongly updated in article unique world record - Sababbi Mangal is not the author of unique world record book which happens to be a world record database / reference book. Limca book of records also does not require a see also section as the article in itself is complete with the details and history of past 26 years. The same is not the case with Unique world record as its a new article at an early stage. For anything else happy to help anytime. One life to live (talk) 10:33, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Making my page live[edit]

Hi Samuell1616, your assistance on editing the page would be very helpful. I've tried to include external links, except the facebook link which I thought would help in demonstrating the brand. Are there any amendments you would suggest to try and make the page live? I have resubmitted the article and removed any biased sources. JamesMCE1975 (talk) 14:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I am not too sure about the subject notability yet, meanwhile plz refer WP:N, WP:RS and if you still feel it meets the guideline resubmit the draft for review. Happy to Help always.. One life to live (talk) 13:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Unapproved Pan Wikipedia Page[edit]

Hello Samuel1616!

I am working with Pan Intercultural Arts and my colleague has already submitted to you our draft for our Wikipedia page. Unfortunately the request was declined and I'd like now to work on it to meet the necessary requirements.

In your comment you talked about "peacock terms" and I need your help to understand better which words or expressions were not enough "encyclopedic". For example, considering the first paragraph, is it better to write "Pan's aim is to help marginalized young people" instead of "Pan helps marginalized young people"? Is this something that can improve our draft, or should I work on different aspects? Moreover, could "find their voice" be not enough clear?

I hope this is the right space to have this kind of discussions, and being new in the world of wikipedia pages, I appreciate every kind of suggestions you can give me.

Thank you for your help!

--Bruns crt (talk) 11:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, When I reviewed the article concern was notability, please check the guideline for clarification here WP:N also refer WP:PROMO, WP:WTW for further doubts. Happy to help always. One life to live (talk) 14:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of records of India[edit]

A tag has been placed on List of records of India, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No proper reference provided

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AmRit GhiMire "Ranjit" 09:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Incorrect CSD - One life to live (talk) 13:22, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

I hope you can help.RE -resubmit[edit]

Hi there, I hope you can help. I am just about the resubmit and have edited the original authors work. I have added newspaper articles and news channel articles, as well as Press and Journal articles. I have also deleted any language which may be considered "Advertising" However, I have noticed the article has been rejected a few times and I wanted to ask your advice. Have I updated it sufficiently? The copyright on all the work obviously lies with me, but I would like to make sure the article complies! I have more articles for notability but they are repeats of the ones listed (STV articles and newspaper articles online) Thank you for any assistance you can give me. Warmest regards Clare (SaltireComics) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saltirecomics (talkcontribs) 08:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

@Saltirecomics: - Do refer WP:REF to understand better the correct way of adding references , secondly you need to remove press release references , thirdly work a little more on the language to make it neutral refer WP:NPV (‘ll be little though as you are closely associated with the subject) . you don’t have to flood the article with references just ensure all the facts are properly cited with reliable reference sources WP:RS. Happy to help anytime --- One life to live (talk) 19:59, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! I will give that a shot! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

18:48:11, 17 May 2015 review of submission by Saldonarc[edit]

Hello. I have re-read my submission, and it seems to me that practically each claim is supported by sources. Can you please clarify why you think this is not correct. Saldonarc (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

@Saldonarc: Hi, we can keep discussing or you can opt to make it better and publish it. Plz refer WP:N , WP:NOT , WP:NMG for reference, once you are done submit it for review. Happy to help always-- One life to live (talk) 12:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

00:58:39, 27 May 2015 review of submission by 2601:D:CA00:EBA:7D6E:DD8B:5365:64D0[edit]

Please consider emailing me at <-- I do not see how to access your reply, but once you send me a link to the talk page on which you've posted a reply, I'll have it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I am requesting a re-review because I did cite multiple independent sources (not written by the author) that discuss the person's notability.

I am thinking that maybe the reviewer missed these citations.

This is my first wikipedia entry, so it's also possible I did something wrong, in which case I need some guidance on how to do it correctly.

Thank you!


Hi Samuel -- any chance I could get a response? Am wondering what I can do to hear from you. Thank you!

Julia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CCE6:657F:F109:CF17:41FD:383A (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC) 2601:D:CA00:EBA:7D6E:DD8B:5365:64D0 (talk) 00:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Kunal Bahl alleged PR response[edit]

Dear Samuell1616,

This is with regard to the edit that you reverted stating it to be PR. I do agree that I did eliminate the line that mentioned that Kunal Bahl went to the University of Pennsylvania after failing to get into an Indian Institute of Technology. But I did this merely to present the article in a more neutral sense rather than a negative one. Moreover in India it is a very prevalent thing that students not clearing the IIT entrance test enroll elsewhere (obviously).

Moreover the edit I made added quite a few other details as well, such as his specific engineering degree as well as a few other details and a whole lot of copy editing from a version of the article that seemed to have been almost copied as is from the source which mentions that he did not clear the IIT tests. I felt that those details should have remained in the article at-least. Please tell me if you think otherwise.

I hope you will not mind, but I will revert to my edit and add the detail that he failed to get into an IIT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MSheshera (talkcontribs) 14:03, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

@MSheshera: - Its a factual information about subject that he tried for two years to get admission into IIT but cos of his failure he decided to move to USA, secondly subject was deported from USA which he had openly confirmed in the media. Lot of new / non registered editors or may be the PR firms continuously trying to remove these relevant information about the subject. There is nothing negative mentioned here, subject is notable due to e-com business and as every individual he also has important public information which is registered in subject's encyclopaedia page. You once again reverted the edits and removed the information that the subject was deported from USA, adding subject’s linkedin page does not add any extra info when subject's business website and business page on wikipedia is already linked to the article. You are always welcome to improve the article with correct and relevant information supported by reliable sources; but STOP REVERTING or making these regular attempts of removing the facts supported by reliable sources or trying to ADVERTISE / IMAGE BUILDING / PR for the subject. For anything else happy to help always One life to live (talk) 15:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
@Samuell1616: Thank you for the reply. I will keep that in mind. But I did not remove the detail about him being deported from the USA neither in my revert nor in the original edit that you reverted. It is very much there in the last line of the section. Anyway though will let the article stay as it is and not make any edits till I have more correctly backed information to contribute to it.

Page on Vaibhav Gupta[edit]

Hi Sam,

Requesting you to please look at Vaibhav Gupta's profile, Vaibhav is a serial entrepreneur and CEO of Bidstalk. He recently sold his company to Applift in undisclosed amount.

Techinasia: AdExchanger: VentureBeat: Yahoo Finance: MarketWired: Eu-Startups: Mediapost: Others:

Please suggest if he can have a page on wikipedia.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 14:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

23:42:28, 15 June 2015 review of submission by Sulmarkmack[edit]

Hello. As the author of the Sullair article, I am finding it difficult to understand why you have deemed the article as an advertisement rather than a neutrally written article. I did my best to strip the article of anything that would be considered favorable to this company. Can you please elaborate to let me know why or what areas of the article appear to be an advertisement? Sulmarkmack (talk) 23:42, 15 June 2015 (UTC) Sulmarkmack (talk) 23:42, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


Good day, you are invited to this merger discussion. Lbertolotti (talk) 21:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reverts on Sachin Bansal, Binny Bansal, Rohit Bansal, Kunal Bahl[edit]

Hii i wanted to know why my edits on Sachin Bansal were reverted you specified it to be promotional linking I do not understand please elaborate as if you go to Mark Zuckerberg's article the same has been done there, there is a link to Mark Zuckerberg's Forbes profile in the external section so is that too promotional linking and I also added a new section named family on Sachin Bansals and Binny Bansals articles why was that reverted if its not providing any encyclopedic value then why did you do the same on Rohit Bansals and Kunal Bahls article ?? and why were my edits of adding see also section on rohit and kunal bansal were reverted as the same has been done on sachin and binny bansal articles ??? Dinny paul (talk

@Dinnypaul: The issues are adhering to the basics and can be avoided if you wish to - some examples like :
  • I mentioned the issue on your talkpage post reverting your edits, you can simply reply on the same but you opted to ignore that and posted a new thread on my talk page
  • As mentioned earlier the referred articles are at Start stage and require lot more encyclopedia content to improve it , the articles already have required linking to external websites how does addition to multiple external links by adding a new SEE ALSO section add more relevant information about the subject?
  • Avoid using peacock terms while editing
  • Avoid just a simple copy from a reference / news - every individual have a father, mother, spouse will be better to quote complete information adding encyclopaedia value to the article supported via reliable sources.
  • I did not reverted your edits with ref. to the family details in two of the articles but properly corrected and segmented which add at-lest some relevant information (Family details are not my addition but your edits which I just corrected and segmented) but in remaining two the information is still not making complete sense so either edit with full information or wait till some reliable source of information is available.
  • Avoid playing around with the correctly structured articles how does changing sequence of awards and changing correct sequence of subsections to incorrect one add value ?
  • Its a normal practice to compare when questioned - In case of suggestion don't give excuses quoting another mistakes but will be better to lead by examples to let other follow your work.( Also you missed the stage and structure too of the articles you edited and the one you compared)

Once again appreciating your intention of editing and contributing value to wikipedia suggest you to refer WP:NOV, WP:ELNO, WP:ADV , WP:NOTEVERYTHING, WP:BLP,WP:PEA This will clarify lot of your doubts and for anything related to wikipedia always happy to help ... One life to live (talk) 07:57, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

@Samuell1616: Thanks for clarifying all that although my personal opinion is adding details regarding parents is adding encyclopedic value like for example I did not know Kunal bahl's mother is an interior designer and I added family section on sachin and binny bansal article because I was simply mimicking your edits done on kunal bahl and rohit bansal

I am quite new to wikipedia so I believe the best way to edit is to mimic experienced editors edits anyways thanks again Dinnypaul (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of records of India for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of records of India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of records of India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 00:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Surendra Kumar Surana[edit]

The subject article was PRODed by yourself - it has been restored as a contested PROD. You may wish to consider WP:AfD in the light of this result.Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Sudha Bhattacharya[edit]


I have worked a bit on Sudha Bhattacharya, and believe there is enough now to pass WP:NOTE - there are multiple sources cited from to establish the work done, awards received and publications authored/co-authored. I also tried to add some information on the significance of her most important work, without getting into technical details. Thought I'd seek some consensus on removing the notability notice (you had added it if I am not mistaken, though way back in Jan'15). If you have the time, can you please review and comment?

Thanks, Sdsouza (talk) 19:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers[edit]

Hi Samuell1616,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Samuell1616. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Magic Wand Icon 229981 Color Flipped.svg

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Super new to this and confused. Can I get your help in creating a page for a CEO?[edit]

Super new to this and confused. Can I get your help in creating a page for a CEO? Business/technology/consulting firm focusing on health care. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnatalie1960 (talkcontribs) 17:02, 17 April 2017 (UTC)