User talk:Sandipani1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Stop x nuvola with clock.svg
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Edit warring on Jana Gana Mana. EdJohnston (talk) 18:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

On what ground do you block me? Is editing an article or deleting incorrect information not allowed on wikipedia? Can you prove me wrong for the stuff I edited. What about blocking user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ragib . Did you observe, how biased the article Jana Gana Mana is because of this user? I provided references from the Government of India website to prove my point, but this user has been adamant. Don't you any policy to block users who do not acknowledge authentic resources? --Sandipani1 (talk) 19:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Did you notice that [User:Ragib|Ragib] is on a long wikipedia break, and he/she is preaching his propaganda 24hours a day. I know you and anybody can't do much about that. BTW, I reached 3 edits to this page, am I going to get blocked again?--Sandipani1 (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

It is my fault that I can't stop editing wikipedia articles from time to time, despite trying to get on a wikibreak. If that bothers you, then I'm sorry about that. I hope instead of checking my user page, you will effectively utilize your block to familiarize yourself with wikipedia policies. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 20:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Your biggest problem is you want to preach on everything and to everyone. It look like you are suffering from a phobia that the world is trying to eliminate the bengali culture and bengali language. It is crystal clear from your unwelcomed edits on my page that who is checking whose user page. It looks like you spend considerable amount of time on tracking which user is talking to who against you. --Sandipani1 (talk) 16:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


Once again, this attitude of attacking other users personally will get you nowhere. I again suggest that you focus on content rather than other users when you make a comment. I added a welcome message to your talk page, which I often do for new users, and the standard message contains links to familiarize the newbie with wikipedia policies. I see that you promptly removed it and now claiming that to be "unwelcome edit"!!! :( --Ragib (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Dear Sandipani, I hope you will use this block as a time to cool down, and correct your future behavior in Wikipedia. Please take this time to familiarize yourself with rules and policies of Wikipedia (the links were provided in the welcome message I provided above, but I see that you've removed them :( ).

Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 19:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Dear Dear Ragib, Congratulations on your success :-). This shows how weak your arguments regarding the articles are. Yes, you are right. I saw your behavior and now it seems I have to correct my behavior to be a propagandist like you. You are familiar with 3RR rule but not the other rules NPOV rules. It is you who need more help about wikipedia policies. --Sandipani1 (talk) 19:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Along with 3RR, please familiarize yourself with no personal attack policy. From your ad hominem comments, it does appear that you are unfamiliar with this policy too, and are launching personal attacks rather than discussing content. I hope after your block expires, you'll focus on content and not on other users. I wish you all the best. --Ragib (talk) 19:52, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

It looks like you consider it a personal attack even if anybody argues on your propaganda. Hello crybaby, make yourself familiar what is called a personal attack. --Sandipani1 (talk) 16:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

This is a very bad example of personal attacks. :) --Ragib (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)