User talk:Secretaria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Makeover of Portuguese football[edit]

Hi there

You may have noticed that I am seeking to undertake a makeover of Portuguese football on Wikipedia. It will not happen over night and involves a lot of work. There are three issues that I would like to address concerning page titles of articles and wondered whether you are supportive:

1. We use the full club name e.g. Clube de Futebol União de Lamas and not the abbreviated version C.F. União de Lamas. However abbreviated versions of the name will be linked to the article.

2. In the season articles we use the Portuguese name e.g. 2011–12 Segunda Divisão and not 2011–12 Portuguese Second Division.

3. In the District Football Associations we use the Portuguese name e.g. Associação de Futebol de Aveiro and not Aveiro Football Association.

We can then place the change to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football as we do not currently have a Task Group.

It would also be helpful if you can advise on the criteria you use for the inclusion of Notable former players in club articles.

Kind regards League Octopus (League Octopus 10:45, 23 May 2012 (UTC)).

NB: Sent to Secretaria and Vasco Amaral. Are there any other prime editors covering Portuguese football?

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Secretaria. You have new messages at League Octopus's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Honours[edit]

Sei que não ter qualquer tipo de resposta como de costume, apesar de ter sido sempre bem-educado mas, desde que o conceito seja respeitado, já me é indiferente para ser sincero, não posso obrigar (nem quero) ninguém a ser interactivo.

Como acabei de ver no Moreirense F.C. é favor deixar de pôr RUNNER-UP nas ligas, os segundos lugares são válidos nas taças domésticas (nos clubes) e nas provas de selecções (onde também valem os terceiros lugares no FIFA World Cup, etc). Agora nos clubes não valem. Pode ser?

Obrigado, boa semana - --AL (talk) 01:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Comprovo, com muito pesar, que enviei uma mensagem com o mesmo pedido o ano passado, não me ligaste nenhuma. OK, só queria ajudar, não volta a acontecer.
  • Muitíssimo obrigado pela resposta. Não meu caro, não há dualidade nenhuma, e passo a explicar: em nenhum caso se dão medalhas ou afins quando uma dada equipa fica em segundo no campeonato (uma excepção segundo aprendi aqui no WP, em Inglaterra), nas taças dão-se medalhas ao finalista vencido, tal como nos Mundiais e Europeus.

Em relação às alterações, eu não sei de todos os clubes, mas corrigi muitos na Primeira Liga e na Liga de Honra, se foram alterados é realmente uma pena, mais trabalho. De novo, uma ótima semana compatriota --AL (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Não, sem dúvida, belo trabalho tem o meu caro feito, os meus parabéns! Mas isto com trabalho de equipa "vai" melhor. --AL (talk) 02:30, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Obrigado pela ajuda, mas há coisas a melhorar ainda, como vi no Rio Ave: não é preciso escrever "WINNERS", é implícito. Depois, os títulos são SEMPRE mais importantes que os segundos lugares, por isso o segundo lugar de finalista na Taça de Portugal será a última coisa mencionada, não a PRIMEIRA.

Tchau, boa semana! --AL (talk) 14:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Por favor, outra coisa (quando penso que já está tudo uniformizado vem outra coisa que não estava à espera): não é preciso pôr os "1" e os "2" a seguir aos títulos, é fácil de contar. Pôr os nomes das competições a negro ou não é indiferente, mas o que não pode ser é uns em inglês e outros em português.

Ah, e tal como fizeste no Rio Ave, a WIKIPEDIA não pode servir como referência a ela própria, é completamente contra as regras. Vê este clube para ver como eu estou a uniformizar por favor.

Boa semana - --AL (talk) 01:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Pode ficar uniformizado à mesma, mas diferente, explico: os clubes com muitos títulos (os grandes e/ou enormes) poderão ter os numerais, os clubes como o RIO AVE, TROFENSE, etc, não é preciso. Em relação aos idiomas (e concordo contigo a 100% que muitos estrangeiros não perceberão ao ler), pode-se pôr no original (ou seja, o nome tal qual existe na WP (a tua sugestão do "entre parêntese" acho que ainda confude mais), mas tem que ser TODAS as competições.

Realmente, não percebo o pedantismo grassante que vai por este nosso país (basta ver as notícias, desportivas ou não, o futebol é o mais importante do mundo seja em que canal for), PRIMEIRA LIGA, LIGA ZON SAGRES, LIGA ORANGINA, LIGA DE HONRA agora é SEGUNDA LIGA, LIGA BWIN, para mim sempre será 1ª DIVISÃO, 2ª, 3ª 4ª e regionais.

Saudações --AL (talk) 14:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CD Santa Clara Old Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CD Santa Clara Old Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:C.D. Santa Clara Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:C.D. Santa Clara Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — trlkly 20:46, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

??[edit]

Olá caro compatriota,

pensava que estava esclarecido, já vi que não (Domingos Paciência): os RUNNER-UP (segundos lugares) são só para as TAÇAS ou competições de selecções (onde por vezes até contam os terceiros lugares), não são para os CAMPEONATOS. É favor desfazeres se puseste em mais algum jogador/treinador.

Feliz 2013 - --AL (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Acontece aos melhores! --AL (talk) 16:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tiny Mills[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Tiny Mills has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't think it's notable enough to warrant an article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 19:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Livres zealot.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Livres zealot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo Segunda Liga.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Logo Segunda Liga.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012–13 Fußball-Bundesliga table[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:2012–13 Fußball-Bundesliga table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 16:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

UEFA coefficient[edit]

Hi

Just wanted to let you know about a small mistake you made at UEFA coefficient that has now been corrected. You corrected the whole table and updated accessdate of source which was great. But the mistake you did was that you decreased number of teams for some countries even if no team got eliminated, they enter Europa League instead, so therefore the number of teams for each country stays the same. Just letting you know so that the same thing dont happen tommorrow, where no teams will be eliminated from Europe either. QED237 (talk) 21:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Okay, no problem, I totally understand. Just wanted to let you know what happened. QED237 (talk) 08:08, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Troféu António Pratas[edit]

Why did you remove the 2007/2008 edition? I'm asking because Benfica website counts four.BenficaNNossaPaixao (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited António Pratas Trophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proliga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of WWE World Heavyweight Champions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat O'Connor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)