User talk:Seppi333

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello! You've reached my talk page. Please leave an angry trollpost, a message, or a cookie, depending on your mood – I'd prefer the latter two.
Project editor retention.svg
Editor of the week.svg
Nucleus ER.png
Seppi333
 
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning July 9, 2016
Always friendly and constructively active at and around WT:PHARM and Template talk:Infobox drug. Seppi was patient and persistent and succeeded in gaining the first pharmacology FA star in over three years.
Recognized for
Bringing Amphetamine to FA status and Adderall and Methamphetamine to GA status.
Nomination page

Wiki Journal of Medicine[edit]

I've a suggestion for you. The Wikiversity Journal of Medicine accepts submissions of medically-related images for publication. The format is to give some scientific background, describe the history of any previous versions of the image, references and sources, and the decisions made for how to present the information. It's an interesting way of having a searchable (on google scholar) cite-able record. It was featured in the signpost last week too (link).

I think your diagrams and their interactive versions would be great candidates for submission.

I think its an interesting experiment in bringing together the Wikipedia and Academic communities so I'm also submitting {{Eukaryote_gene_structure}}. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 01:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Hmm... sounds like an interesting concept. I'll look into it. Honestly though, the vast majority of previous revisions of my images were from me checking how the SVG would render on wikipedia since I didn't know about the SVGcheck tool at the time. Face-tongue.svg Seppi333 (Insert ) 17:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
I think previous versions refers to other people's earlier images on the same topic (if any at all!), i.e. why was there a necessity for your better image. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 23:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Oh, hahahaha. Ok I see now. That makes me less embarrassed about submitting some of these then. Seppi333 (Insert ) 14:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I thought I'd let you know that it you're still interested in the possibility of submitting a figure review (either an existing diagram or something new), let me know. There's now another example of the sort of content that such an article can have (e.g. Gene structure). The journal's gone through a few updates so the submission process is now a lot easier. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 12:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey there. I do plan to submit something within the next few (~3-6) months, but don't expect to do so in the more immediate future since I've got a lot of off-wiki things to deal with at the moment. I left this thread unarchived because it's on my to do list. =P Seppi333 (Insert ) 09:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for making and maintaining the beautiful neurochemistry diagrams. I learned about several Wikimedia features by reading Template:Catecholamine and trace amine biosynthesis's source. Seeing the attention and skill that you put into making this technical artifact so that can be flexibly used in tens of articles, including articles in other languages, really brightened my day. Thank you for all that you do here. --Chkno (talk) 07:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm glad that you find it helpful! It takes longer to create annotated images relative to placing text in the image file itself, but I think wikitext annotations are preferable due to the utility that they provide. In any event, I appreciate your kind words. Face-smile.svg Seppi333 (Insert ) 00:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the thanks Seppi --Iztwoz (talk) 23:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

NP, you deserve the credit. Face-smile.svg Seppi333 (Insert ) 23:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Human brain[edit]

Thanks for having a look at the article and making some changes, Seppi333. We're aiming to nominate for GA at some point in the medium term.

It's been quite hard given the extensive role of the human brain to balance accuracy, prose length, comprehensiveness and readability. If you haven't had a look through the whole article I'd be quite grateful if you could skim along to make sure there's nothing unusual about it, given you're one of the few editors around who may have an informed view about it. There's a couple of editors (including one now blocked from editing it) so we can't speak to all the edits, and I plan on editing to finish up the modern history and clinical significance sections tonight... but for an article like this, more eyes will be better

Hope that you're well, --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Hey LT. Sure, I'll take a look tomorrow. Seppi333 (Insert ) 09:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks very much Seppi333, also I and other editors on slow connections would be very grateful if you could archive some content, your talk page takes a very long time to load :)...! --Tom (LT) (talk) 09:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
@LT910001: Alright, I'm going to start looking at it now. Out of curiosity, how long does it take you to load my talk page on your connection? Also, how does the load time for my talk page compare to the load time for the human brain or amphetamine articles? Amphetamine is one of the few pages on Wikipedia that doesn't load immediately on my connection (i.e., it takes 1–2 seconds since it's about 208 kB ≈ 8x the current size of this page). Seppi333 (Insert ) 23:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I look forward to your comments. Honestly, when using my phone it was pretty awful. 1-2 minutes and it didn't always load. Lucky I don't have to rely on it :P. --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
@LT910001: I removed the transclusion of my talk archive since the size of that page is 360kB. My talk page should be easier to load now. Seppi333 (Insert ) 01:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 :) --Tom (LT) (talk) 09:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Addiction#Reward disorder or reinforcement disorder[edit]

Please check out my comment.--Penbat (talk) 10:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

ANI notice[edit]

You're a fine editor but I take issue with the abrasive tone of your edit summaries regardless of their validity. But this went further. I don't want interact with you. I can't, at least presently. — βox73 (৳alk) 01:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Please consider the language you're using Seppi; describing the work of others as "shit", "retarded", or "dumb" is not in the slightest bit helpful. You do great work here, don't let that be tarnished by attacks at your fellow editors; we're all here to build an encyclopedia. And edit summaries are not for discussion - use the talk page. Sam Walton (talk) 10:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
@Samwalton9: I'll make an effort to curb my frustration in discussions with Box73 in the future. Going forward, more than likely I'll just seek assistance from WT:MED instead of engage him directly since I feel like I'm at an impasse in regard to getting him to cite reliable sources for medical statements. Seppi333 (Insert ) 10:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

hi[edit]

Seppi, would you like me to post this GA nom,beta-Hydroxy beta-methylbutyric acid to do Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine so you can get the ball rolling, let me know(I'm sure it'll pass easily)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Hey Ozzie. Yeah, I'd really appreciate it. Face-smile.svg Seppi333 (Insert ) 10:40, 20 April 2017 (UTC)