- 1 Second round for Haitian Senate
- 2 Disambiguation link notification for July 5
- 3 Disambiguation link notification for July 13
- 4 Disambiguation link notification for August 4
- 5 Valdivia's Deutsche Zeitung
- 6 Disambiguation link notification for August 20
- 7 Disambiguation link notification for October 13
- 8 changes made on cds peoples party
- 9 PDECAT/PDECat and PDPC/PDC
- 10 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 11 2015 Illapel earthquake
- 12 24 horas al día
- 13 24 horas al día
- 14 Pregunta
- 15 Removing BLP Prod from Aryane Steinkopf
- 16 Primarias 2017 Chile
- 17 "Standard used on these templates do not include indirect elections"
- 18 Nominating templates for deletion
- 19 ArbCom 2017 election voter message
- 20 Your contributed article, United Conservative Party
- 21 United Conservative Party
- 22 Speedy deletion nomination of United Conservative Party (Canada)
- 23 United Conservative Party (Canada) listed at Redirects for discussion
- 24 Haitian general election, 1988
- 25 A page you started (Fazio's Shopping Bag) has been reviewed!
- 26 Orphaned non-free image File:Unione Sudamericana Emigrati Italiani.jpg
- 27 Thank you
- 28 File:Muricy Curitiba 1976.png
- 29 S.A.C.I Falabella
Second round for Haitian Senate
Hi Since 1/3 of the Senate will be elected in October for the first round and the second round will take place in January 2017, I propose is renaming "Haitian parliamentary election, 2015-16" in "Haitian parliamentary election, 2015-17" or to create an article on the two rounds of the Senate vote. --Panam2014 (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Telenorte, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Calama and Julio Martínez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christian Democratic Team of the Spanish State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Left. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Democratic Agreement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Thayer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Please read WP:PROD. Anybody (including IPs and article creators themselves) can remove a PROD and it should then not be placed back. Doing so repeatedly is disruptive. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 14:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Democratic Party (Chile), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1973 coup d'etat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberal Progressive Party (Spain), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Liberal Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
changes made on cds peoples party
Good afternoon about a week ago you made changes on the cds people's party page. I had noticed a mistake and decided to correct it. You changed this information back to what it previously was which was information back from 2004 that did not have much to do with the topic. Thank you for your understanding — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deportivo2016 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
PDECAT/PDECat and PDPC/PDC
On the PDECAT issue, ok, I won't engage on endless edit warring on this. PDECAT may surely lead to confusion (because "P", "D" and "E" stand for their own words, whereas "CAT" doesn't). PDECAT and PDECat have been used interchangeably, and here in Wikipedia we're not required to strictly abide for a party's registered name in a template (the UK's Conservative Party registered name is Conservative and Unionist Party, but its template uses just "Conservative"). However, the party is new and still in the process of forming itself, with the name itself being a rather rushed one after their previous one was cancelled, and with it now seeking a logo (which may or not may change how the acronym is spelled). Since there are no new elections expected anytime soon, we can still wait for seeing what the most-commonly used form of the name is.
For PDPC/PDC I don't agree. There are options for both of them, but you currently can't claim what the Ministry of the Interior says because the coalition is not registered anymore. Both are valid, but PDC is more consistent with how the coalition was spelled ("Pacte Democratic per Catalunya", not "Pacte Democratic Per Catalunya").. It's also more consistent with its successor's spelling, CDC. Impru20 (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- More: In Google, for Book searching pdc "pacte democratic per catalunya" gives you 36 results, whereas pdpc "pacte democratic per catalunya" gives you only 2 results. On a normal Google search, pdc pacte democratic per catalunya gives you 3,290 results, whereas pdpc pacte democratic per catalunya gives you only 152. It's pretty obvious which one is more common and widely used. Impru20 (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- So, of course, I'm not saying that "PDPC" is wrong, but that "PDC" is more correct in this case. I'd have chosen "PDPC" if finally the original name for PDECAT had remained, to prevent confusion, but it's no longer the case now and the coalition was obviously much more widely known and shown in sources as "PDC" than "PDPC". ;) Impru20 (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
I noticed that you moved the page 2015 Illapel earthquake to 2015 Coquimbo earthquake by copying and pasting material. Per Wikipedia:Moving a page, this is not the proper way to move a page. At the top of every page is a "Move" button which should be used instead. That will work in cases where there is either no redirect at the new title or where the redirect has no edits. This will not work in this situation, however, because neither of those conditions are met. That aside, why did you move the page? What is your rationale? At this point, you must initiate a move request if you think the current title is problematic for whatever reason. Thanks. Dustin (talk) 05:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Good evening!, I can understand all you said me, and i value all your effort, but that is not the proper way to move a page, and your argument is not valid, Why?, belive me they aren't the same show, they can share a main brand, but they are totally different, as example ITN (a british news company) as 24 horas in Chile, they do 5 News (of Channel 5), Channel 4 News (of Channel 4) and ITV News (from ITV), that is amazing because only BBC One has an independient news programme, maybe they had the same production, but at end they are different. Other example is BBC News (A cable channel, and too a producer of news programmes of BBC), for example they produce BBC News at Six, BBC News at Five, BBC News at Ten and all have different pages. I hope that you understood what I wanted to say, it is better have all separated that all tangled, and disagreements are resolved through consensus-based discussion, not by tightly sticking to rules and procedures. We are all brothers, ¿Why we fight?, better don't destroy others work, and help me to create nice contents. Have happy holidays! If u have a problem or a concern, say me, I'm here always. Finally a big thank, for take care of Chilean based contents! I appreciate you ChocolateCherryNight (talk) 23:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- If u want to make a big change as u want, u should make a proposal into Talk page, not here, and resolve it by consensus-based discussion, sorry that's all, you and i, we aren't Wikipedia God's, there are others users, talk there. --ChocolateCherryNight (talk) 23:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
24 horas al día
Please, can you stop to censorship Wikipedia. Please don't make that type of editions. At this point go to Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. Remember: The purpose of the discussion page is to achieve consensus upon a course of action. Individuals will express strong opinions and may even "vote". To the extent that voting occurs, the votes are merely a means to gauge the degree of consensus reached so far. Manuel.21 (talk) 23:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Yo sé que en general te disgusta casi cualquier aporte que hago, y ten la seguridad que al igual que en Wikipedia en español dejaré de colaborar en artículos sobre Chile en inglés. Pero tengo mi duda sobre el revertir el template de shortname del PPD, que al menos en inglés no se entiende que quiere decir y que todos los demás templates usan nombres abreviados y no acrónimos. Ni siquiera diste una explicación sobre la razón para la reversión antes de hacerlo. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 03:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Removing BLP Prod from Aryane Steinkopf
Hi. I removed the BLP Prod tag from Aryane Steinkopf because there are many Portuguese-language sources available about this person. I added some where I was able to confirm what they mean using Google Translate, but I hope someone with more fluency in Portuguese will be able to add more. If you're still concerned about the article feel free to AfD it. Thanks. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 08:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Primarias 2017 Chile
Hola. ¿No crees que sería mejor tener un sólo artículo para las primarias presidenciales de 2017, como se hizo en 2013? Así se puede tener una tabla con los resultados de ambas primarias y comparar. Además, no creo que ambos artículos sean de una extensión tal que justifique separarlos. Saludos. Pristino (talk) 19:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
"Standard used on these templates do not include indirect elections"
- There wouldn't be a source for this. It's a long-standing consensus amongst editors that has been in place for at least 10 years I'd say. If you want evidence of other editors being aware of it, here are some:  Cheers, Number 57 13:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Nominating templates for deletion
Please be aware that you cannot nominate templates for deletion at AfD; I have closed your deletion discussion for this reason. Please use WP:TfD instead when nominating templates for deletion. Thank you. SkyWarrior 18:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
- Similarly, WP:RFD is the location for redirects that you would like deleted. Please do not turn redirects into articles purely for the sake of attempting to game the system and get the pages deleted out of process. Primefac (talk) 19:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Your contributed article, United Conservative Party
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, United Conservative Party. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – United Conservative Party (disambiguation). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at United Conservative Party (disambiguation). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the , or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
United Conservative Party
- There is a move discussion started at Talk:United Conservative Party. Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of United Conservative Party (Canada)
A tag has been placed on United Conservative Party (Canada) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 07:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
United Conservative Party (Canada) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United Conservative Party (Canada). Since you had some involvement with the United Conservative Party (Canada) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Just a quick query on the parties of the presidential candidates – you have Lysias Verret down as representing the Party of the National Rally. However, according to your source, the party was not recognised until 1995... Any idea whether Verret was actually a PARAN candidate? Number 57 22:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Fazio's Shopping Bag) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Fazio's Shopping Bag, Sfs90!
Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Passes review. Optional, but an infobox would add to the article
To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Orphaned non-free image File:Unione Sudamericana Emigrati Italiani.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Unione Sudamericana Emigrati Italiani.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Sfs90! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I’m inviting you to join other people who edit conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where group members can ask questions and meet new colleagues. You'll also discover DYK: the easiest and funnest way to get your article on the Main Page. I hope to see you there! – Lionel(talk) 07:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey, noticed you have edited S.A.C.I Falabella description and eliminated most of the last updates. Just wondering why you find outdated information more relevant that the one included by the Company? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 15:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)