User talk:Sgerbic/Archives/2011/10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Survey

Hi Sgerbic!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 03:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Not news

Please see Talk:Richard Dawkins#Wyndgade Country Club where I have proposed removal of the new section. I forget where I saw it, but I noticed when your arrival was mentioned somewhere, and skeptics are particularly welcome and essential at Wikipedia, IMHO. However, it takes a while to get used to the local culture: editors frequently encounter text that is a problem with regard to WP:NOTNEWS or WP:UNDUE. Another common issue is when someone adds more or less the same thing to several articles—duplication is rarely desirable. Johnuniq (talk) 01:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

I've made some edits to the article and to the portions on the talk page that need to be incorporated. Would you like to do more, or shall we just add it to the article and see what happens? -- Brangifer (talk) 06:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

I think you have done a lot. I kept seeing all your edits when I looked at my watchlist. I say add it to the article, it can always be taken out or changed. Be bold Sgerbic (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I've done it. It's not that bad and can always be improved. It represents his scientific work much better now. -- Brangifer (talk) 21:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
I think the page looks awesome. Now where are you headed? So much to do, so little time.Sgerbic (talk) 04:40, 24 October 2011 (UTC)