User talk:ShifuC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shifu Ramon Careaga (January 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

April 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ahecht. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Kentucky, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 21:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shifu Ramon Careaga, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ShifuC. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Shifu Ramon Careaga".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shifu Ramon Careaga}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:00, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shifu Ramon Careaga, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shifu Ramon Careaga, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShifuC. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Shifu Ramon Careaga".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shifu Ramon Careaga}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:20, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 21:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

"Please refrain from using talk pages..." is what you really mean. You don't want your leftist, and (remarkably) poorly and one-sided articles questioned by anyone that doesn't fit a criteria. If you receive criticisms you don't want to hear about them. Wikipedia is a dumpster fire of propaganda. Every time you make high value source contributions someone doesn't like because they lean left (and away from facts), they simply remove it and claim it violates this or that policy. I am done with this FAKE encyclopedia. It's a trashcan of weasel words, liars, and petty lords/tyrants. So many articles lean left, or against many actual historical facts, it's just sad. About the only reliable thing with wikipedia is the sports columns. You don't even want to hear criticisms within the FORUM SECITON of the website. In other words, you don't want to hear facts, and you want an Orwellian website that re-creates history as you see fit. But if anyone supplies links or a critique that says "hey, this isn't accurate or precise or fair, or unbiased" then it's "delete" and send them a condescending Talk Page, that in essence says "don't talk". F you, and the horses you rode in on, you suck, this website sucks, it will never be a real encyclopedia. Just one more pile of rubbish in a long line of digital rubbish that exists. When the final Orwellian state comes, and your voices are also crushed, all of you Winston Smiths will become Useful Idiots to your new overlords, and be wiped out. I would pity you, except I consider you the enemies of liberty, free speech, and Truth. So I welcome your demise.

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]