User talk:Sideshow Bob

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

June 2016[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Emir Kujović. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. GiantSnowman 19:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Montenegrin Americans without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Please don't remove sourced content relevant to infobox statistics.
Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you wrote a comment about another editor (diff) referring to another editor as very obsessive and very biased . That is clear violation of Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Taking in consideration that in the same edit you stated I've been here for ten years and am well aware of the rules somebody might think that you deliberately violated this important policy in order to provoke another editor. Please accept my friendly advise to try not to repeat such violations in future. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Template_talk:Coat_of_arms#RFC[edit]

Hi Sideshow Bob,

Just to inform you there is a discussion that might pertain to your edits as well, please feel free to give your opinion: Template_talk:Coat_of_arms#RFC. Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 08:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Martinići (1796), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Turks and Piperi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Duško Radinović
added a link pointing to Montenegrin
Ognjen Spahić
added a link pointing to Montenegrin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Bjelica[edit]

Stop with vandalism... if you dont know anything about basketbal articles here, then stop to edit them. Nationalities are not linked, and if Bjelica have Serbian passport he will have both nationalities in infobox. Just look at milion other arciles and maybe you will understand.--Bozalegenda (talk) 12:57, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political parties in Montenegro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hsp starcevic.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hsp starcevic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Stats in football players' infoboxes and update of career stats[edit]

Hi.

When you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the timestamps as of when the stats are correct. This is done by updating |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter when updating club appearances and goals, or |ntupdate= (or |nationalteam-update=) when updating national team appearances and goals. The easiest way to do this is to use five tildes, which automatically converts to the current time. For example |club-update=~~~~~.

When you update the career statistics please remember that you should also update that timestamp as well to a time when the stats are correct. This is done by manually updating the date above or below the statistics table. By doing this we show when the stats were last updated and it prevents other editors from accidentally updating the stats again.

This is done to show other editors when the stats were last updated and prevent them from accidentally updating the stats again, and also it shows readers that it has been updated.

Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 09:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Sideshow Bob. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Petar I Petrović Njegoš[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Petar I Petrović Njegoš shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ktrimi991 (talk) 21:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

MontenegroWiki 2.0 ?[edit]

Pošto vidim da si još uvijek s nama, možda ćeš biti zainteresovan s novijem projektom koji sam započeo sad skoro... Treba mi dosta pomoći, pa se tebi obraćam. Ako si zainteresovan, uđi pa udri!

http://www.montenegrowiki.me

--Birziminium (talk) 04:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Giuseppe Pinelli[edit]

Giuseppe Pinelli wasn't killed (consequently, he wasn't victim of human rights abuses). Please, don't change the page. --151.65.128.21 (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

No, I'm pretty sure he jumped out of the police station window for fun then. Jog on... Sideshow Bob 06:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm talking about the facts. All the rest is foul. --151.65.112.134 (talk) 05:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Piperi[edit]

You marked the text as "disputed" and that it's correctness is proven false and yet, you gave no explanations or arguments why and where it is proven false and where it is proven that sources are false. If Mariano Bolizza, Vujovic, Ivo Banac and others are not reliable sources to you (Mariano Bolizza was one of the rare people who lived in 17th century and wrote about Piperi, Vujovic, Banac, Miller and Vukcevic are reliable and proven historians with a lot of books written about that topic and other similar topics), than you should really stop dealing with that topic or I will see what Wikipedia can do about vandalism and edit wars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Jim Moriarty (talkcontribs) 12:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Carol I[edit]

Please don't place Carol at the end of the chain of command. I'm referring to this edit of yours. See the talk page. --Cei Trei (talk) 12:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

The discussion in question is found on the talk page on the article about Siege of Plevna, but a similar argument is used for the entire war. The chain of command needs to be respected; however, if there's an argument that explains why we should list Carol at the bottom, please let us know. --Cei Trei (talk) 13:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NewArsenalTivatlogo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NewArsenalTivatlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:FSCG.png[edit]

Please do not be so quick to assume the worst with respect to other editors. Per Wikipedia's non-free content use policy, the use of non-free logos, etc. is not automatic, so arguing WP:OTHERIMAGE is not very a valid justification for non-free use. This particular file's non-free use was previously discussed at WP:NFCR (a link to that discussion can be found on the file's page); so, if you feel it was removed in error and its non-free use should be re-considered, then they are ways go about doing that which do not involve edit warring (for reference, removing non-free files per a previous discussion is an exception to 3RR per WP:NOT3RR).

In general, with respect to non-free content use, logos such as this are considered acceptable when used as the primary means of identification in stand-alone articles about the national association/federation, but not so in individual national team articles because the main national body is considered to be the parent entity per item 17 of WP:NFC#UUI, whereas the teams are considered to be child entities. This interpretation has been confirmed a number of times at WP:FFD or in discussions at WT:NFC, but you can ask for further clarification at WT:NFC if you like. Of course, there are many national team football articles on Wikipedia and in some cases the logo may be licensed as public domain or released under a free license which means its use would not be subject to Wikipedia's non-free content use policy; in other cases, the logo may be non-free, but there may be specific reasons why non-free use has been allowed or it may simply be the case that the file's non-free use has yet to be discussed. So, just as other stuff exists applies to articles, OTHERIMAGE applies to non-free use.

Like anything else, previous consensus about non-free use can change over time, so if you'd like to try and establish a new consensus for this particular file's non-free use, you can start a new discussion at FFD; on the other hand, if you feel a more general discussion is needed regarding this type of non-free use, then the best place to do that would be at WT:NFC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Sideshow Bob. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Metropolitans of Montenegro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Unijerina[edit]

Hello, Sideshow Bob,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Unijerina should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unijerina .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 10:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Europe population map countries.png[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The file File:Europe population map countries.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 17:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions note[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

TonyBallioni (talk) 13:27, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joanikije Lipovac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 23:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Montenegrin Third League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Federal and Zora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Vandalising - Njegoš[edit]

Please do stop with your propaganda driven edits. Njegoš was not a Milo's party member style ethnic Montenegrin. He was a proud Serbian nationalist. This is a well documented fact (if you need a number of sources, contact me).

I shall report you for starting an edit war and vandalising the page.

Mm.srb (talk) 00:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Calm down, take a deep and try to formulate a coherent thought for starters. Sideshow Bob 06:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)