User talk:SilkTork

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Edmund Blair Leighton - A flaw in the title.jpg



I will listen to you, especially when we disagree. Barack Obama

To remove the sandbox link add #pt-sandbox { display: none; } (or li#pt-sandbox {display: none;} for MonoBook users) to your common.css page.

To prevent the "Your edit was saved" message add .postedit { display: none; } to your personal CSS.

To prevent site notices add #siteNotice { display:none; } to your personal CSS.

To prevent the MediaViewer follow these instructions

Use {{Reflist|30em}} instead of {{Reflist|2}}


Richard0048 and Consensus[edit]

Hello! As the involved admin on the Eritrea page you will definitely be interested in this Edit War Report (see here: [1]) about Richard0048. AcidSnow (talk) 23:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Looks like that has been dealt with. SilkTork ✔Tea time 03:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Librarianship and human rights listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Librarianship and human rights. Since you had some involvement with the Librarianship and human rights redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Done. SilkTork ✔Tea time 12:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

pushing a rock up hill ...[edit]

hi Silk Tork ! If you have spare time .... remember the Janis article that you made into a nice, tight, well-written piece ? Well, some doofus gossip columnist has been at it. Some of these people must have grown up on As the World Turns. I can't edit that thing because I'd shred it entirely and cause a ruckus but you are suave and debonnaire with them much-vaunted personal relationship skills. If you have time, that is ... Otherwise, I should just stay away from that article. Why are people such grovel-in-the-mud petty washerwomen ? It doesn't add to our understanding of anyone's significance to the world :(

Thanks ! 210.22.142.82 (talk) 10:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I'll add it to my to-do list, but I'm not that active on Wikipedia these days so it may be a while before I take a look. SilkTork ✔Tea time 11:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ratebeerlogo.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Ratebeerlogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 23:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:BeeradvocateLogo.gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:BeeradvocateLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 23:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Leo Frank FAC[edit]

Hi Steve, you had helped me with the GA review for Leo Frank last year and I just nominated it for FAC. If you aren't completely sick of the article by now and have had enough time to recuperate, feel free to leave some comments. Tonystewart14 (talk) 09:40, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I am not so active on Wikipedia these days, but I did find that article quite interesting, so will take a look at the FAC to see what concerns are being raised. I don't think I will have the time to give a FA review, but will see if I can help out in addressing concerns where possible. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:53, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:Non-alcoholic drinks has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Non-alcoholic drinks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 10:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:Hot drinks has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Hot drinks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 11:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

As far as I can tell from the page history, you created this (and the one above) as 'beverages' and it was renamed today (via a page move) as 'drinks'. Oculi (talk) 14:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
I would likely have been following the existing naming convention on Wikipedia. I can't tell you why "beverage" got such a hold on Wikipedia, but I'm glad someone is now tackling it, as "drink" is the more appropriate term. SilkTork ✔Tea time 15:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)