User talk:Sleepingwithfire
December 2012
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Justin Long was changed by Sleepingwithfire (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950232 on 2012-12-25T18:48:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:48, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
November 2013
[edit]Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Breathe Carolina, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. STATic message me! 03:55, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
January 2014
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Of Mice & Men (band), you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 15:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Of Mice & Men (band), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 19:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Of Mice & Men (band) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 20:43, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 21:05, 21 January 2014 (UTC)