User talk:Cirt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Smee)
Jump to: navigation, search

WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Wikipedia.
Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log
Nominations list: 390 articles (17 of them are on hold) as of 01:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC) | edit
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.

Note: entries for inactive discussions, closed or not, should be moved to the archive.

The Signpost
21 July 2016
AFD/TT-7T-8T-2RelistedAFDOWP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Law, Internet, News, MedicineAFD tool linksWP:DRVWP:MFDAIVRFUBUAA/CATRFPPPERCSDABFARFAC urgentsTFARRSNBLPNFTNGAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Freedom of speechHuman rightsJournalismSexology and sexualityLGBT studiesFeminismWomenGender StudiesWomen artistsWomen's HistoryWomen scientistsWomen writersMedicineLawInternetInternet cultureComedyU.S. Supreme Court cases
RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 22:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

The Land of Gorch[edit]

Note: Copy edit appears to still be ongoing by Baffle gab1978 (talk · contribs). Much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 23:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I've finished my c/e, sorry it took longer than usual. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4[edit]

Do you have any more comments or concerns at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4. If not feel free to stop by and support/oppose based on the current state of the article and your involvement in FAC1 and FAC3 involvement.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Der Brænder en Ild[edit]

Hello friend! I hope you haven't forgotten about the GA-review. No rush, just a friendly reminder. :) Best, Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 20:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4[edit]

You were involved in one of the prior WP:FAC or WP:PR discussions about Emily Ratajkowski. The current discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4 needs more discussants. In my prior successful FACs, success has been largely based on guidance at FAC in reshaping the content that I have nominated. I would appreciate discussants interested in giving guidance such guidance.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Userfied article: Taekwondo Association of Great Britain[edit]

Hi Cirt, I wish to either create or reinstate the article about TAGB. As you are the deleting administrator for this I would like your input on how to proceed. Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks very much. LiLT — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaylorTKD (talkcontribs) 13:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Bad for children listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bad for children. Since you had some involvement with the Bad for children redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others closed[edit]

An arbitration case regarding Gamaliel and others has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. Gamaliel is admonished for multiple breaches of Wikipedia policies and guidelines including for disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, removing a speedy deletion notice from a page he created, casting aspersions, and perpetuating what other editors believed to be a BLP violation.
  2. DHeyward and Gamaliel are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with or discussing each other anywhere on Wikipedia, subject to the usual exemptions.
  3. DHeyward (talk · contribs) is admonished for engaging in incivility and personal attacks on other editors. He is reminded that all editors are expected to engage respectfully and civilly with each other and to avoid making personal attacks.
  4. For conduct which was below the standard expected of an administrator — namely making an incivil and inflammatory close summary on ANI, in which he perpetuated the perceived BLP violation and failed to adequately summarise the discussion — JzG is admonished.
  5. Arkon is reminded that edit warring, even if exempt, is rarely an alternative to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE.
  6. The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing WP:BLPTALK policy by developing further guidance on managing disputes about material involving living persons when that material appears outside of article space and is not directly related to article-content decisions.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others closed

Your GA nomination of Climate Change Denial Disorder[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Climate Change Denial Disorder you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 02:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


Wow, you did a lot of great work on Lie-to-children! I'm impressed. :-) --Kim Bruning (talk) 00:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Good work there. The only things I can think of might be the absence of indicators where Pratchett himself discussed the idea in his other novels. I don't know if they qualify as RS, but this page and maybe this one, or others like it, can be used to indicate where else he discussed the idea. John Carter (talk)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Deletion to Quality Award[edit]

Ambox warning orange.svg Wikipedia:Deletion to Quality Award, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion to Quality Award and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Deletion to Quality Award during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mootros (talk) 08:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

TWL Questia check-in[edit]


You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! 20:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Climate Change Denial Disorder[edit]

The article Climate Change Denial Disorder you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Climate Change Denial Disorder for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 22:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Climate Change Denial Disorder[edit]

The article Climate Change Denial Disorder you nominated as a good article has failed Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Climate Change Denial Disorder for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 22:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Centre for Equality and Inclusion.jpg[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:Centre for Equality and Inclusion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)