Thank you for visiting the page of Mir madan. hope you knoe that Mir madan has encyclopedic importance in indian history. however You are requested to watch and wait pls. I have just made the page. there are lot of time and scope to edit, add info and references. As a jr. wikipedian can I expect little more time upgrade the page? I am hereby assuring the team wiki that I must enrich the page gradually. thank you for help in antecipation. Pinaki1983 (talk) 17:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC) Pinaki1983 (talk) 17:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
I understand, and I am glad that you have improved the page greatly. However, in the future, to avoid contributing to a CSD backlog and risking deletion, please use your sandbox to experiment before putting an article on the mainspace. smileguy91talk - contribs 23:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Nee the help and guidnce of sr. wikipedian like you always. Pinaki1983 (talk) 12:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC) Pinaki1983 (talk) 12:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Smileguy91, the page you deleted on Cumberland Heights as not created to promote them, it was created to cross link many articles in existence by various public figures whom have attended and gratefully remained sober by the work conducted at Cumberland Heights. It is a 50 year old institution and they are not profiting off having a Wikipedia page, in fact they have always been a non-profit organization. They do great work and help save many lives of people struggling with drugs and alcohol. Their work is not only scientific, but also grounded in spiritual principles. This page serves as an educational and unbiased piece of work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Lindsay (talk • contribs) 15:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
I noticed that you blanked the page before I tagged it for speedy deletion, which in itself qualifies the page for deletion, since it was on mainspace and not userspace. Also, I see that the page created by you has already been tagged for deletion multiple times. If you wish to create an article about Cumberland Heights, please do so first in your user sandbox, and make sure that it conforms to guidelines on Wikipedia, especially those concerning notability. Please also consider viewing the page WP:YFA as a starting point for creating an article.
As a final note, I do not delete articles myself, because I am not a Wikipedia administrator or bureaucrat and thus do not have those permissions. I simply tag articles for deletion as part of WP:NPP. Best wishes for your future Wikipedia editing. smileguy91talk - contribs 15:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Smileguy, please help me understand, what is blanked a page? I stand corrected in saying you deleted the page, my apologies. I did create the page in sandbox after the first time is was deleted. I am following the guidelines. Please help me understand more on how I am going about this in the wrong way. I am trying to learn and be helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Lindsay (talk • contribs) 15:53, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, understood, however I hope you can see that was unintentional. I was trying to use the "talk" feature. I will review all helpful guidelines you've provided and restart my page in the sandbox. Thank you for your time sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Lindsay (talk • contribs) 16:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - TheMagnificentist 22:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor Fielding until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75(talk) 23:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
I created the article as a redirect not as an actual article so no objections here. smileguy91talk - contribs 23:53, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 468 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!
But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.
Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.
Hello Smileguy91, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.