User talk:Smith609

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Please note: to avoid duplication, I'll reply to queries on this page.

Images by Friedrich Oltmanns on Commons[edit]

Hello! These drawings will soon be deleted since the author died only in 1945 and his works will be released to public domain on January, 1st. They may be automatically restored then. Mithril (talk) 20:25, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Have these images now been restored? 11:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Automatic taxobox inconsistency[edit]

Is there a reason why both {{anglicise rank}} and {{taxobox/showtaxon}} contain switch statements to convert stored ranks to displayed ranks? Until I altered the latter today, there was an inconsistency: any part of the system using {{taxobox/showtaxon}} displayed a stored rank like "unranked_familia" as "Unranked familia" whereas any part using {{anglicise rank}} displayed it as "(unranked)", which is what I think is correct. Can {{taxobox/showtaxon}} be altered to use {{anglicise rank}} instead of its own separate switch statement? I'm painfully aware that what appear to be simple and obvious changes to the automated taxobox system can have bad side-effects! Peter coxhead (talk) 13:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

update toolbox.js to new stats system?[edit]

Hi. Your toolbox.js has become so much a part of my Wiki life that I'd forgotten that it wasn't actually part of Wikimedia. <g> Since stats.grok.se has been down for a while now, perhaps the link in toolbox.js could be updated to use the new "official" stats tool? Cheers. Le Deluge (talk) 19:35, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

I've checked, it works if you just replace the stats.grok.se URL with "https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/#project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-30&pages=" + - and whilst you're at it, the heading needs to be <h3> rather than <h5>. Looks like Wikidashboard has gone for good though. Le Deluge (talk) 19:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Glad that you find the script useful. I've made the suggested changes. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 10:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

DOI[edit]

Your recent edits added a doi with two slashed and one with .pdf on the end. Also, they used the dead {{cite doi}} template. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 16:36, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for catching these errors. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 09:22, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Citation Bot[edit]

I've tested the new Citation Bot code via https://tools.wmflabs.org/citations-dev/doibot.html. It seems to work fine and fixes the logged out bug. Could you run git pull in the main citations project on Tool Labs so that the code is updated there as well? Kaldari (talk) 05:29, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

I assume this is what you contacted me about via e-mail; if not, please do send me a link to the pull request. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 08:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
I know you have about as much spare time as a forest firefighter in California, but I have posted some potential bug fixes on the bot talk page. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 19:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Smith609. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

RevisionSlider & WikEdDiff interaction[edit]

Hi! You are receiving this message as it looks like you have a copy of the WikEdDiff user script in your user space on this wiki.

When using the RevisionSlider and WikEdDiff together WikEdDiff will not function correctly when the RevisionSlider is used to load a new diff. This can be fixed by adding a simple hook listener to your copy.

During a deployment slot today the RevisionSlider extension will be turned on as a beta feature on all wikis.

For the first week the RevisionSlider will be deployed with a 'hack' that will mean WikEdDiff will continue to work, but on the 21st and 22nd of September this 'hack' will be removed.

You can find the relevant phabricator ticket here which contains the code that you will need to add to your copy of the script (in most cases). Please also use this ticket for further questions & discussion.

Addshore (talk) 09:20, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection[edit]

Padlock-blue.svg Hello, Smith609. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)