User talk:Snieckus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Snieckus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- No Guru 18:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Warnings, 2007 Feb 24[edit]


Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Pierre Trudeau. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

Also, to repeat the warning given by No Guru, please read Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which all articles must follow. This is especially a concern at Pierre Trudeau. Wikipedia is a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia; it is not a place to argue a particular point of view. Thank you.

Quite aside from the "3-revert rule" (3RR), repeatedly making the same edits that violate the neutral point of view policy is liable to be considered vandalism, and thus to get you blocked from editing. -- Lonewolf BC 06:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)