User talk:SocaAmbassadour

Replaceable fair use File:FayAnnLyons-BeatBreastCancerMusicFestival2011.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FayAnnLyons-BeatBreastCancerMusicFestival2011.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:45, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 91844dd2d69e14db0fd5b62cc8fdfaf5[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! 91844dd2d69e14db0fd5b62cc8fdfaf5

File permission problem with File:Fay Ann Lyons missbehave2012 single.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Fay Ann Lyons missbehave2012 single.jpg, which you've sourced to IZATRINI.com. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the no permission tag, because you've credibly given a good license. However, I've added a no source tag because the source you gave was directly to the URL, so there's no way of us verifying the license. Please edit the page to give a link to the description page so we can verify everything you've given. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:05, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Michael Terry Weiss.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Michael Terry Weiss.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 06:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Andrea Parker.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Andrea Parker.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called MissParker. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name MissParker~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

16:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Why is my username now showing with that weird extension (~enwiki)? I'm pretty sure that is not the username I chose for myself when I signed up for this.

Your account has been renamed per the messages above this one. Usernames were changed to be the same across all the Wikimedia projects. Kb03 (talk) 18:56, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Buy Nothing Project.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Buy Nothing Project.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, as you did at Buy Nothing Project. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

– Joe (talk) 15:11, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SocaAmbassadour (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will be happy to share my bank statements to prove I have never been paid (or tried to get paid) for anything I have ever done on Wikipedia. Joe Roe, is it customary to convict a person without their knowledge or even any actual evidence? If anyone received payment under the user SocaAmbassadour, it would have to be a hacker, not me the original owner of the username. I hereby confirm that I have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements. (You do realise the Buy Nothing Project is about not using money transactions, right? How would I actually get paid? This smacks of mischief) State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits: not being compensated, now or ever: feel free to contact the founders of the Buy Nothing Project and ask them about the admin who runs the Buy Nothing Travelers Network, who tried to make a wikipedia article to share about the BNProject. Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future: Wikipedia has never been a place for me to do anything but exercise my passion for topics of which I think the world should know - whoever ascribed something different to my intent, that's not my fault - and I no longer have any interest in contributing to this encyclopedia beyond making minor edits on articles I previously created or edited, just to keep things factual, where necessary. MissParker (talk) 09:26, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you aren't being paid, then you're not in violation of our terms of use. However, you seem to be admitting that you have a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest can exist even if someone is editing in good faith. Unconscious bias often causes people to write non-neutrally and focus on details that outsiders don't care about. If you're willing to follow our best practices for editors with a conflict of interest, you stand a better chance of being unblocked. Part of this entails being straightforward about the nature of your COIs and properly disclosing them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:04, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You obviously work for Buy Nothing, which was confirmed by nonpublic evidence submitted in ticket:2021010410000487. The nature of your compensation is between them and you, and is completely irrelevant here: the point is that you have a material interest in promoting them that is contrary to our interest in writing a neutral encyclopaedia. You were asked to acknowledge this and follow our rules two and a half years ago, but chose to ignore it. – Joe (talk) 11:19, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]