User talk:Socrates2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Main page appearance: 1968 Thule Air Base B-52 crash[edit]

This is a note to let the main editors of 1968 Thule Air Base B-52 crash know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on January 21, 2013. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 21, 2013. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegates Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you can change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

A set of four B28FI thermonuclear bombs

The 1968 Thule Air Base B-52 crash was an accident on January 21, 1968, involving a United States Air Force (USAF) B-52 bomber. The aircraft was carrying four B28 nuclear bombs (examples pictured) on a Cold War "Chrome Dome" alert mission over Baffin Bay when a cabin fire forced the crew to abandon the aircraft before they could carry out an emergency landing at Thule Air Base. Six crew members ejected safely, but one who did not have an ejection seat was killed while trying to bail out. The bomber crashed onto sea ice in North Star Bay, Greenland, causing the nuclear payload to rupture and disperse, which resulted in widespread radioactive contamination. The United States and Denmark launched an intensive clean-up and recovery operation. USAF Strategic Air Command "Chrome Dome" operations were discontinued immediately after the incident, safety procedures were reviewed and more stable explosives were developed for use in nuclear weapons. Workers involved in the clean-up program have been campaigning for compensation for radiation-related illnesses they subsequently experienced. In March 2009, Time identified the accident as one of the world's worst nuclear disasters. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Just a note of appreciation for the work that you're doing in polishing the article before its main page appearance - much appreciated. Regards, BencherliteTalk 09:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

No worries - it's been a long while since I last worked on it, so it needed some attention to get back into shape. One point that I might run past you though concerns the article name - there seems to be some precedent for this incident being known as the "Thule accident", which would override the current naming naming convention. Thoughts? Socrates2008 (Talk) 10:08, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
If that's what the sources would generally refer to it as, then that would seem fine to me. Stick up a {{requested move}} on the talk page to see what others think and we can get this sorted before main page day (particularly as I imagine renaming the article would involve a little bit of rewording of the opening few sentences of the lead). BencherliteTalk 10:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Precious[edit]

Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg

aviation
Thank you for quality articles on aviation, such as 1968 Thule Air Base B-52 crash, and for devoted reviewing, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (3 July 2009)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:18, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you kindly. Socrates2008 (Talk) 10:05, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 372nd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Two years ago, you were the 372nd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:22, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification of discussion[edit]

A few months ago, you participated in a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Did you know about Gibraltar-related DYKs on the Main Page. I am proposing that the temporary restrictions on such DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012, should be lifted and have set out a case for doing so at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs. If you have a view on this, please comment at that page. Prioryman (talk) 22:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Ref R4 rifle prototypes[edit]

Hi Socrates.

Regarding the R4 rifle changes I made. I wrote as clear a ref as I could. The marketing materials mentioned cannot be accessed anymore. The manufacturer has not responded to my emails up to now. So one will have to accept the changes I made as is, im sorry, best I can do. I saw the stuff with my own eyes :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike257257 (talkcontribs) 13:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello - I appreciate that you may have seen this. However, the rules at Wikipedia are very clear when it comes to verifiability. Basically, if it can't be verified then it can't be added, even if it's "true". Socrates2008 (Talk) 11:54, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Ellen Southard GAC[edit]

Hi Socrates, I just finished reviewing this very cool and interesting article. Thought you'd like to know! Good luck. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for the note and for doing the review - I'd actually forgotten about it, it's been so long. Socrates2008 (Talk) 09:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome! This is totally why we ping nominators, especially since the GAC queue is often so long. I've responded to your improvements; all you need to do is work on the lead, as I suggest. Thanks, it was fun learning about new stuff! ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Korean Air Lines Flight 007[edit]

Category:Korean Air Lines Flight 007, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William 13:28, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Edward Snowden employment[edit]

Please cite evidence that Snowden was an employee of CIA and NSA. Cited references state that he said that and it is shown that he worked for NSA contractor at the time of leak.Patroit22 (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Erm, please show me where I've said he's an NSA employee? Socrates2008 (Talk) 09:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Auxiliary fuel tank from Robinson R-44 helicopter VH-HFH.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Auxiliary fuel tank from Robinson R-44 helicopter VH-HFH.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 19:28, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Auxiliary fuel tank from Robinson R-44 helicopter VH-HFH.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Auxiliary fuel tank from Robinson R-44 helicopter VH-HFH.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...[edit]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (tec) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Great photo of WYD at Barangaroo! I was somewhere just to the left of the pope mobile. Do you have any more pictures from that day? I would love to see them if it's possible. Thanks! Snookerman (talk) 18:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Massacre at Kassinga.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Massacre at Kassinga.PNG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)