User talk:Solarra/Archive 2
Łukasz Targosz caseHi, Thank you for checking my article. I took contest speedy deletion. Could you look at it? Day stamped by: ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 05:43, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
CISCIS is hate group http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/publications/the-nativist-lobby-three-faces-of-intolerance
Dear SolarraI love you. Sincerely, your secret lover. <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 05:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thanks and an explanationThank you for the warm welcome Solarra. My explanation for the personel attack I posted on your talk page is, I was not intending to attack you but I posted that with a lot of heat. The same reason applies to the numerous spelling mistakes I made in the message I posted on My talk page. This heat resulted from the fact that I thought that you were randomly calling my edits vandalism, you see: your third reversion of my edits contradicts your first reversion of my edits. Further I thought that you knew that pelycosauria is not a valid clade(my reason being that no scientist other then Michael J Benten use pelycosauria as a formal clade). Sorry for the personal attacks.Aliafroz1901(talk)14:27, 19 June 2012(UTC)
Year of death changed from 1870 to 1822HI Solarra Do you really think that Sir Isaac Heard lived to be 140? His correct year of death is 1822. Please re-correct.
Date stamped: ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 22:59, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Flower of ScotlandI had a message off you recently about the date of release. I believe it was actually released in 1974, and written in 1965. I'm not sure what the presented date is to do with but would be interested to know. Please let me know any other information about the song. From The Corries Wikipedia Page - "They had several albums in the top 50 album charts in Scotland, and released a single: - "Flower of Scotland" (1974)."
assistance regarding Analog PussySolarra, i would like to ask for your assistance regarding the page of the band Analog Pussy - on wikipedia. thank you, jinno.
solarra, thank you for responding, - but no — it doesn't help at all. could we please do it by email? - please email me. there is a major dispute between the owners of analog pussy — jiga & myself. jinno.e@gmail.com Day stamped by : ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 06:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC) . What was not constructive about changing the redirection?"European federalism" suggests an ideology, not a group. The UEF are not the only group promoting European federalism. The Federal Europe article better explains this ideology. --109.153.96.239 (talk) 10:52, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Cement Revertsplease do not remove content regarding Energetically Modified Cement on the "Cement" page. The content is approved by a leading academic in the field. So please, do not vandalise the page. You are a law student. Respect freedom of expression and the limits of your expertise. And I do not want to debate this, I do not have time. Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jono2013 (talk • contribs) 11:15, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
AppleAgain, Corporation and Incorporated is different types of companies, but Corps and Corporation is the same. Applist (talk) 12:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC) Apple Forever!
A barnstar for you!
FEMENHello. I saw you reverted the last edit on "Femen" article. The edit did not represent a vandalism, as it is possible to check that many of the protests organised by FEMEN are indeed highly controversial, which does not mean negative or bad. 141.138.38.202 (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
User talk:Rebsec: wrong warningYou gave a last warning (Lv 4) to User talk:Rebsec. He had not received any warnings whatsoever before. All he had was a speedy deletion notice and a username COI concern notice. Neither one is considered a vandalism or spam warning so a Level 4 is unwarranted. -- Alexf(talk) 13:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
Taribo WestDid you even read my edit? Did you see the information I changed was as per source? Did you see the information on the page had two different dates of birth? Thanks. 86.183.98.24 (talk) 14:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
RekhaI don't see what was wrong with it. Its a forum all about her so why can it not appear as her website? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BollyFanJenny (talk • contribs) 14:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
the Mauritius Commercial Bank LtdHi Solarra, We are the communication department of The Mauritius Commercial Bank Ltd. Please note that we are currently feeding updated information on the MCB. Information that you can confirmed on our website : www.mcb.mu Kind regards, MCBCom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcbcom (talk • contribs) 14:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
User talk:Mcbcomwhoops. I was rolling back his edit and dropping a template at the same time you were. My rollback failed but the template went through. Feel free to remove it from users page if you like. Thanks - 4twenty42o (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2013 (UTC) RevertsCould you please kindly stop your reverts before you actually discuss? There is probably some confusions regarding the facts. Thanks. 14.0.144.102 (talk) 15:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Jeff SamsHi, Solarra. Jeff Sams was best man in my wedding and we have know each other since 1979. YOu have the birthday wrong. It's 6/18/68. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.140.67 (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
1984 UEFA cup finalHi, the alterations I made to the page entitled "1984 UEFA cup final" were not meant by me to be a test, but rather a genuine improvement of the page by adding an infoBox -- in keeping with more up-to-date pages of finals of the UEFA cup/Europa League e.g. the page entitled "2012 UEFA Europa League Final". Obviously I would prefer my alterations to remain, but if you have some kind of objection to the introduction on an infobox then I won't make a fuss about it. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.74.195.209 (talk) 16:39, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
IstitahHello. Yes you made a mistake by reverting my edit. The topic is simply never going to expand beyond two lines, and hasn't done for seven years now. What it relates to is whether a Muslim can or cannot perform the Hajj pilgrimage. This can easily be covered by transferring the two lines of text to the lead section of the Hajj article. 90.218.98.130 (talk) 09:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
/* Request cancel review at WP:AFC */I am the editor of the online Perihelion Science Fiction magazine. I would appreciate it if ONLY the magazine submission from User:Crossdown/sandbox is reviewed and considered. A couple of my colleagues went ahead and tried to create Wikipedia articles. I thank them for their support, but these articles were not to be posted for review without my approval. I doubt they will be approved in any case; they violate Wikipedia standards all over the place. Again, please only consider the submission from User:Crossdown/sandbox. Cancel the submission review request from User:Lynn_Usher/sandbox. Thank you. Sam Bellotto Jr, editor, Perihelion Science Fiction. Crossdown (talk) 10:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
MV MurreeBy some means I don't quite follow I had created two pages Motor Vessel Murree and MV Murree. MV Murree was the correct one with all edits. The other was a duplicate and lacked some content. I am in the process of trying to delete it totally and if you can help with that that would be useful. Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by TWAMWIR (talk • contribs) 10:43, 5 April 2013
Thanks very much, my main concern is not to lose this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Murree Robert /TWAMWIR — Preceding unsigned comment added by TWAMWIR (talk • contribs) 10:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC) GrawPlease explain what is wrong with the post i placed on GRAW. I have only advised people that a page exists for players of the game where they can arrange clan matches post results and talk to other gamers. I see nothing wrong with what I did. Please advise before I take further action. Ray Rudd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xl BOOSTER lx (talk • contribs) 10:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
grawAgain you have removed an edit by myself for no reason from GRAW. You have also failed to advise me why except for your standard message. You do not even no what my post related to and why I have set up GRAW RESPAWN. Please advise why or leave my posts alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xl BOOSTER lx (talk • contribs) 11:24, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
So if the link alone was removed and the reference left in place would you be happy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xl BOOSTER lx (talk • contribs) 11:29, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
According to your definitions should not the whole GRAW page be removed as it is a commercial product and just by having a presence it is an advert in itself. Self promotion is not allowed according to you!The definition of encyclopedia n. A comprehensive reference work containing articles on a wide range of subjects or on numerous aspects of a particular field, usually. My post was an aspect many people would find interesting — even if you did not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xl BOOSTER lx (talk • contribs) 11:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
No Sorry it does not help. Graw Respawn is a site set up to help people who play the game. It is therefore relative to the game itself and will allow people to understand how the game works on a real level. The link provided general information about how results and matches could be arranged by users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xl BOOSTER lx (talk • contribs) 11:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Improper reversion on user talk page
My Computer Has Been Slow.I would like to remove my posting. I think there would be no harm. Thank you for sending me a message. I will post again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BoseManup (talk • contribs) 12:29, 5 April 2013 (UTC) incorrect changes in Analogpussyhave a look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog_Pussy someone has deleted the current band members (Jiga and Eva) and also look at the history it says "Jiga was born in age 15" ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ klm 80 (talk • contribs) 13:07, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Use of HuggleHello, Solarra. Today I have noticed quite a number of your Huggle edits. Most of what you do is fine, but some of your edits look to me as though they have been made without sufficient thought. For example, your recent edit to Heavy Items Such As Books, Record Albums, Tools reverted a redirect of an article about an album to the article about its artist. It does not look to me as though the album warrants an article of its own, in which case the redirect is well within Wikipedia practice. If you made the edit fully aware of what you were doing, because you think that there is a good reason why the album should have its own article, then you were wrong to rollback the edit, and also wrong to post a message to the editor whose work you reverted saying that the edit "didn’t appear constructive", rather than giving a proper explanation of why you disagree. If, however, as seems more likely, you acted because the edit superficially looked in Huggle like vandalism, then you were wrong to simply click on the Huggle button without further checking. Huggle is very good at indicating edits that may well be vandalism, but it is not a substitute for intelligent assessment of each case. When you made that revert, I had myself already seen the same edit in Huggle, checked both the edited article and the target of the redirect, and decided that the edit was legitimate. You need to do the same. Many edits in Huggle that I think may be vandalism I check in a browser first, and simply click on the big red button only in really blatant cases of vandalism. If this seems like a big fuss about one small mistake, I am just taking this one example to illustrate my concerns, because, as I have said above, I have seen a number of edits that I was not entirely happy about. Finally, can I emphasise once again that most of your edits are fine, and I am not trying to put you off, but just trying to help you make your success:failure ratio better. (It will never be 100:0, because we all make mistakes sometimes, but it should be possible to achieve something like 99:1.) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:19, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Rest in pieceYou said "rest in piece" to Ebert. That's inappropriate, he's still intact. Deignknits (talk) 13:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Heyyyy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.116.127 (talk) 15:13, 5 April 2013 (UTC) AIV Guide
edit conflictBe careful with bot driving: two of you appear to have had a mid-air collision. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:16, 5 April 2013 (UTC) hi im superman1091 what are you trying to say Rollback reason?Not really sure what in this edit warranted reversion... as best I can tell, "first team debut" is indeed the proper phrasing; either way, I think it could have at least used an edit summary. P.S. Love all the pink on this page. :) — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 05:19, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Disruptive editing accusation?Please note that I have no intention to make any disruptive editing in Wikipedia. The editing I made at Multiply page was additional information I gathered from many correspondence and even face-to-face interviews with some Multiply users regarding their present feeling toward the new Multiply. Even the link I tried to include was just a sample of the page that accommodate the complaints from these Multiply users after their previous complaints at Multiply's Facebook page was ignored and even deleted. For your record, I'm not affiliated with the link I tried to add. I got it from one of the persons I interviewed. I'm going to edit it again, and I hope you could at least check it first before considering my edit a spam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwinthecrow (talk • contribs) 08:51, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
air mediterraneeHello Solarra, I would like to know for which touroperator is Air Mediterranee operating from Tangier?? Because in The Netherlands and Belgium nobody know somethin about this flight.
Oke thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.80.188.105 (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2013 (UTC) This was not vandalism, I am merely putting on the possible outcomes for the next matches. What is wrong with that? (84.187.179.32 (talk) 09:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC))
Ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.178.152.80 (talk) 11:09, 6 April 2013 (UTC) BLP issueI'm a little surprised that you restored a BLP issue about the father on Michael Barker (drummer) . Sure the son is a troll, but that the father supports him is not cited. Please be more careful. Toddst1 (talk) 15:12, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
RE
Lana WachowskiIt's incredible that you are actually actively insisting on misgendering Lana Wachowski in the Matrix article. Shame on you. 87.218.178.235 (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but why did you change my edit for Miss Universe 2012? I had a big time put on that. C'mon ask first before you act, or better think first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.232.194.2 (talk) 01:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello.How are you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.254.48.202 (talk) 01:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
"Frost"Thanks. I don't care much one way or the other about Danny's userpage, but these IPs & SPAs are getting to worked up over a trivial matter. Your diligence in protecting the Project is greatly appreciated. – S. Rich (talk) 02:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
It's not a trivial matter to those who are actual military or veterans who have been wounded and lost friends. SCOTUS ruled in the SV case that true speech is the cure for false speech.ComancheDoc (talk) 02:57, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
CSD taggingHey Solarra! I saw you tagged 40Budz for speedy deletion, however, under the wrong criterion. I changed it to {{db-a7}} from what you tagged it as {{db-g1}}. Just wanted to give you a heads up about tagging articles with the correct criteria, or criterion. I think WP:FIELD is a good guide to tagging articles, so if you want, you can look that over and use it as a reference point. Thanks for your work! -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
List of Kung Fu WeaponsI redirected this article to Eighteen Arms of Wushu because that is the traditional list of weapons used in Chinese martial arts. Sorry for not explaining that correctly in my edit summary. 71.213.175.82 (talk) 03:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Any Sand Animation Artists you know?PLease i am doing a project on sand animation but i cannot find any more artists please help me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.88.241.6 (talk) 04:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
You're a Fast Draw artist!I had to LOL when I saw this: [8]. Thanks again. – S. Rich (talk) 04:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Recent messageThank you for your concern with recent edits made to the article 2010s in fashion. However, I fail to see why I have received a notification for my edits. You will find that they are all independently sourced and verified with independent citation. Many of my recent edits have been made in response to another user who has repeatedly altered or removed information without independent citation, instead citing his own opinions as rationale for these alterations. This is the user whom you should be addressing in regards to edits on this particular article.66.170.204.148 (talk) 04:47, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Last Temptation of ChristI removed that content from The Last Temptation of Christ because it had no source. That was a considered act on my part, not a mistake. My edit summary, "no source", should have been self-explanatory. You should not have reverted me. 203.118.187.125 (talk) 05:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
EggbellyEggbelly should not be deleted because it is a slang term for Dr. Robotnik in universe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eggbelly (talk • contribs) 05:28, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Flooding in Northern New South Wales 2013On the Tweed River (New South Wales) page, under the Flooding sub-section, it states that in 2013, the area was hit now a minor flood, but was actually hit now a major flood. The cited reference does state that it was a major flood, but the error of of minor flood was written on the Wikipedia page. 58.164.5.131 (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Greyden Campbell
Edit to entry on track 'Silent Lucidity' by band QueensrycheHello Solarra, I noticed my edit was removed due to the fact that I was unable to provide a source. That's fine. Just to comment, however, that some factual entries are difficult to confirm with a source link — I was, for example, updating the fact that the track in question was heavily used in a Levi jeans campaign shortly after the album was launched. I can provide no source for this — other than my own memory. It was this commercial that got me interested in the band in the first place. Having searched for a copy online of the commercial, I am unable to find it. However, it's hardly a critical update :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.55.154 (talk) 05:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC) I just spent a couple of hours updating Lourdes Pérez' wikipedia entry (Life and Work) and (Other film music). All absolutely legitimate updates to reflect the last few years. You didn't just remove "an inappropriate link" (which one was that?) but actually removed all the information I added. There was no link to a promotion or selling site nor was there any copyright violation. All were links to verify the information. What exactly was the problem and how do we restore the information that I so carefully entered? Thank you. - Annette D'Armata
Thank you for restoring the info. The section I added "Other film music" is still missing in action, however. Can these be returned also? Thanks. 70.162.8.88 (talk) 06:38, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Annette
Stock Model is not a PROMOTIONAL AD. Why didnt you google it first? Im looking at what people have posted on your page and it look like you love bothering people that not doing anything negative. No offense but- A LAW STUDENT WITH THIS MUCH TIME ON THEIR HANDS TO FLAG DOWN A PHRASE... AT ALMOST TWO IN THE MORNING???Shareemichelle (talk) 06:23, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Spam linking?Does this edit really count as spam linking? Seems to me that the user added it WP:AGF. Isn't a warning a bit to harsh? --Vincent Liu (what?) 06:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
99.104.185.17Not sure if you saw this revert I did on your talk page. I've warned the editor. It seems like they may end up at AN/I soon. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 07:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Media Transfer ProtocolThankyou for your advice. It was not a test but a genuine attempt to edit and correct the terms used to describe the actions of MTP. A weelchair "allows" a paraplegic to do more than they could without a wheelchair but for a person who is able to walk using a weelchair "controls" or limits what the person is capable of. In effect MTP controls and limits the USB interface preventing unlimited direct memory access to a device (this can help to prevent memory errors) but to state that it "allows" access implies full freedom of access, this is not the case. The Drawbacks changes are user observable differences between USB and MTP access to mobile computing devices. The security flaw can be recreated by any user of an MTP controlled device on any Windows PC, try it yourself. My appologies if my editing is amature, this is the first time I'm trying to edit Wikipedia, feel free to provide a better description than my own, I'll read it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.152.37 (talk) 08:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank youFYI, I am an experienced Wikipedia contributor who chooses not to be registered and who uses different IP addresses that all may be shared with other people. But you didn't know that, so thanks for the "welcome to Wikipedia". You said I supplied unsourced material that has been reverted. In fact the only edits I've made from this IP address that had been reverted when you posted that were edits for style, not content, and therefore did not need sourcing. The reverter was in error according to the MOS, and I've unreverted the edits and cited the relevant section. So thanks also for calling my attention to the reverts. --65.94.50.223 (talk) 08:47, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
TKEOn the Tau Kappa Epsilon wikipedia page there is a subsection labeled Kappa Sigma Fraternity that contains content that is 100% incorrect and needs to be deleted. at every attempt I made to edit it myself and remove this obscene and hateful text, you "Solarra" undo my deletion and return the page back to its former state to include the false information. FIX THE PAGE, you are obviously an immature person who has ill feelings towards Tau Kappa Epsilon, you're a Kappa Sigma brother, or you're obviously not reading the lies you are so intent on keeping on the Tau Kappa Epsilon wikipedia page. FIX THE PAGE, NOW! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.236.228.23 (talk) 10:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
2012 in archosaur paleontologyWhy was the addition of these two taxa to the article "unconstructive"?--Macrochelys (talk) 11:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Over-taggingYou added some irrelevant tags to Andrea Perego. A single paragraph does not yet need to be divided into sections, it forms its own lead, and it did not seem in need of reorganisation. On the other hand it would have been useful to add the {{link rot}} template, as well as the appropriate {{BLP sources}} and {{notability}} which you added. Please take a little more care when tagging articles. Thanks. PamD 13:35, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback Message added 14:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Faizan (talk) 14:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Solarra, I'd appreciate your not editing my edits! You reverted my edit on the "Johannesburg" entry on the ground that I did not explain the edit. I did. Quite clearly. The original content contained an urban myth, without citation. I took it out, and explained that it was an urban myth. Please leave it alone. Rgds, Michael — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.2.248.182 (talk) 14:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Mike DaillyWhat in the devil is up with me trying to add that he worked for DMA design to the disam. page? Your automated bot keeps auto reverting me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.151.247.179 (talk) 14:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for my mis-stepHi Sollarra, I did not intend to vandalize any pages. I also did not realize about inserting external links. I was only trying to correct some information regarding my father. 1st, the 10th Street artist club had his name misspelled, 2nd My father is a WPA artist and should be included in the list. I do not understand why you removed my father's name even without the external link? My father was the co-inventer of the Carborundum print making technique along with Dox Thrash and should be credited on the Dox Thrash page. At some point I would like to have a Wiki entry for my father. He is probably one of the few surviving WPA artists if not the sole surviving WPA artists. Thanks Cmesibov (talk) 14:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)cmesibov List of Horizon episodesHi Solarra, Sorry about not describing the edits. First of all, I did an unconventional way to move around the content from one section to another -- the full article is simply too long and I didn't want to use the article edit for that. Hence, I did the edit section by section. Then, there was a problem with the Wikimedia server kept giving me error, causing problems to the earlier edits. The latest one at 15:46, 7 April 2013 is correct and up to date. Basically there was a mistake on the recent episodes being listed as a new series when they are still on the current series 49 2012-2013. Please revert to the 15:46, 7 April 2013 edition. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.152.92.210 (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Dez BlanchfieldSolarra, I put my User page back — not sure why you deleted it, I'm updating and editing — please don't delete, happy to modify if you see issues. thx.. dez 203.16.243.200 (talk) 13:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC) UpdateOur block-evading troll is up to five accounts, at least: 99.104.185.17 (primary account), 200.233.70.48, 64.75.159.129, 196.12.59.12, 202.88.225.150. An admin told me he's using proxy servers, so that's why they're in cities all over the world. ;) Most have been blocked. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 21:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, we haven't officially met...They call me The Wikimon... I just wanted to say Hi, because I see that you and I are regular Counter-Vandalism members and you seem to be beating me by a whisker... Anyways, I'm a new guy here and I thought I should converse with as many users as possible... Please don't tell me your in college cause your talk page is real cute and unexpected from a teenager... (Ok I'm kidding, I was just trying to know if you go to college or school)!! Anyways please do look up on my contributions and I have also proposed a WikiProiject on Apps... If you can please help with submitting your views... Thanks and bye!!! The Wikimon (talk) 08:13, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Editing concernsHello, Solarra. Three days ago, I posted you a message expressing concerns about your use of Huggle. You thanked me for my message, but I am afraid you are still having similar problems. What is more, I see there have been numerous messages to you about the problems, both before and after I posted my message. As I have said before, and as others have said, most of your work is good, and it would be a pity if you lost rollback rights because of a minority of cases where you are insufficiently careful, but it really is far too large a minority.
List of marinas: Difference between revisions (Reverted edits by Birdhampool (talk) identified as spam (HG))List of marinas: Difference between revisions (Reverted edits by Birdhampool (talk) identified as spam (HG)) Why did you revert these additions to the marina list? The two entries by Birdhampool seem to be legitimate Marinas which seem to exist in the locations indicated. I googled them and they came up as real. http://www.royalclarencemarina.org/ http://www.birdhampool.co.uk/ Am I missing something obvious or have you made an error in deciding these additions to the list were spam? Ken Heaton (talk) 10:13, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Solarra, if you wouldn't mind, can you please timestamp your signatures? It's very confusing to editors when comments have no time/date. Thanks! :) 76.189.111.2 (talk) 11:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC) A brownie for you!
A kitten for you! You might have missed my message just before that discussion on your reverts, but this is for the amount of effort that you have put in... And yeah, you rock at Counter Vandalism! The Wikimon (talk) 11:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Huggle+Cluebot= ?Something happened here!···Vanischenu (alt) 11:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
My ApologiesI apologize for changing the form of English from British English to American English, I use American English and did not recognize that the word was properly spelled but in British English. I will check the Country that the article is most likely discussing before making future edits. Thank you for your comments. sssssss340 13:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 14:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Yunshui 雲水 14:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC) okra seed oil :palagiri.Dear sir, I wrote an essay in Telugu wikipedia about okra seed oil and thinking to translate it to English.so I edited the redirect of Okraseed oil.so if you have no objection regarding this,I will write about Okra seed oil.Please see my editing in telugu wiki. Palagiri (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
3O thanksHi, I'm a long-time volunteer at the Third Opinion project, and I'd like to thank you for helping out there. We can always use more help (and the same is true at all of the content dispute resolution venues here at Wikipedia), so your help is especially appreciated. One quick request: When you give a 3O, would you please remove the dispute from the list at the 3O page? (I generally do it when I decide to give the opinion, rather than waiting until after, but that's up to you.) That way other volunteers can go directly to the active disputes, rather than the ones which have already been handled. It's good to have you around and keep up the good work! Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Božidar Bobby GabershekHello Solarra. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Božidar Bobby Gabershek, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: highly distinguished martial artist is an assertion of importance. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 11:21, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Reviewer grantedHi Solarra, I just wanted to let you know that I have granted the reviewer userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages. Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, please contact me and I will remove it for you at any time. See also:
Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks......for the banstar. Not everyone would have been so well-disposed to me after I was so critical of your editing. However, no doubt you took in the fact that I said quite explicitly (and more than once), that most of your work is good, and the criticisms apply only to a minority of cases. Do keep up the good work — but be careful. The point is to slow down a little with your use of Huggle. Even if you get 10% less good work done, if you also make 80% fewer mistakes, it will be worth it. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
MuseumSolarra, could you remove the section you added to the article — you used the words "The Silk Route Museum is also a name associated with Yasheng Group, ... and has been accused of securities fraud" which is incorrect, the museum has not been accused in any of the sources you listed. Furthermore, the Yasheng Group is not associated with the silk route museum, but the silk route fund, which is a different entity. Finally, source 5 does not lead to an actual article and I cannot find one which links any wrong-doing with the museum or even the fund — consider all the people Bernie Madoff sponsored who weren't involved just sponsored.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 15:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
ThanksMany thanks, Solarra, for keeping an eye out for vandalism on my personal pages. Regards, Pinethicket (talk) 12:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Martin EdwardsAs I said in my edit summary, it's spelt "licence" in British English - "license" (as a noun rather than a verb) is an American English variant. 2.27.55.34 (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 15:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Faizan(talk) 15:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC) Serena WilliamsI agree with the hard to read that it needs a proper reformatting. However, I don't think it's too tedious, because most of straight set matches are only a single line, it might need some shortening. The ones that goes to three line are three setters. And also a main problem is that the person that said it's to tedious i mean Fyunck is actually making things to complicated. For example. Her next opponent was the first woman ever to score a 'Golden Set' in a Grand Slam event in the Open Era, Wild Card Yaroslava Shvedova of Kazakhstan. Williams dominated the first set taking the first five games before Shvedova took a games, Williams eventually won the set. However, Shvedova came back in the second set breaking the Williams serve in the sixth game and eight game, she also didn't face a single break point in the second. The third set came on serve until the tenth game, where Williams' broke with some errors from the Wild Card, and she served out for the match, digging out a brilliant backhand lob to set up her one and only match point. This can be shorten in a way. Her next opponent was the first woman ever to score a 'Golden Set' in a Grand Slam event in the Open Era, Wild Card Yaroslava Shvedova of Kazakhstan. Williams dominated the first set taking a 5-0 and eventually won the set 6-1. However, Shvedova came back in the second set winning it 6-2. The third set came on serve, until Williams' broke to lead 6-5 with some errors from the Wild Card, and she served out for the match, digging out a brilliant backhand lob to set up her one and only match point. The problem is he doesn't want to show scores, which i find odd as the readers will be able to understand it better with the score. Also he wants things to be numbers to be written as words than numbers, which i don't get as numbers are easier to read than numebrs written as words.Dencod16 (talk) 17:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Arab Holocaust rescue effortsIt wasn't a test, Shoyteh. I was fixing minor typographical errors. 208.102.160.123 (talk) 23:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
American History XHave you actually watched this movie? There are horrible acts of violence against people of color in this movie. This is a horrible racist movie and should never have been made. The director is British and knows nothing of American Politics. Please put my comments back on Wikipedia because what I said is the truth! American History X This film is a snuff film. There are brutal acts of violence against people of color in this movie. Don't watch it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.208.78.250 (talk) 01:42, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Reversion at Elmira JackalsI'm not sure if you watchlisted that page, but User:69.205.159.133, whose edits you reverted has created User talk:I updated the Elmira Jackals page, it took me over 2 hours to do so, you say i deleted information, and i did not, i simply added it into the right categories and then added more information, I do Not understand why you deleted it. I deleted that page because it's obviously misplaced, but wanted to pass along that editor's comment to you. DMacks (talk) 02:47, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
User:114.72.166.198A quick note to say I've blocked this IP for 24 hours to given them a chance to calm down a bit! Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 10:42, 11 April 2013 (UTC) Joan AikenHi Solarra, I'm not sure why you removed my additions to the Joan Aiken page? My position is that this Wikipedia page is being used for an 'unofficial' page on Facebook, so I would like to link from this article to the official Joan Aiken Facebook page. This is not a conflict of interest, it is in the interest of those who are seeking information about Joan Aiken, and I am that official source. Lizza LizzaAiken (talk) 11:40, 11 April 2013 (UTC) info@joanaiken.com
OK Thanks for your care and concern! LizzaLizzaAiken (talk) 12:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC) hellothe intent of this was to request attention to anyone who can raise it for deletion. Can you please get this deleted? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.131.2 (talk) 08:56, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added XapApp · talk · contribs 13:54, 12 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. I remember youSolarra, just wanted to say hi. Hey, I just noticed that your talk page is being auto-archived way too often. It looks like it's archiving every day. Haha. I think you can set it to archive when it reaches a certain size instead of by the number of days. But I've never seen anyone archive daily; it should be more like 30 days if you're programming it by number of days. You can ask someone like Yunshui about it. He's an awesome admin. Anyway, just wanted to say hello. Have fun. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 07:45, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
how do I find what change you deleted?Hey Solarra, So I got a message that you've deleted a change I made because there was no citation, but I can't for the life of me find what change this was. Can you let me know the details and particulars? Cheers, Dr. Fuse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctorfuse (talk • contribs) 17:05, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletionThe "PROD" that you placed in this edit has been challenged in this edit by a user at an IP address with no other edits. No explanation was given. I think you are probably right about teh deletion. Would you consider taking the article to Articles for deletion? 80.168.237.80 (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2013 (UTC) Arab Holocaust rescue effortsBefore you start bandying about false accusations, try to compare the changes, to determine whether the user is merely 'playing in the sandbox' or is actually making a useful contribution. An apology on my talk page would be nice. 208.102.160.123 (talk) 01:31, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
16:10Hey, thanks again for providing 3O at Talk:16:10. Not sure if you noticed, but I posted a follow-up question to your comment, about which sources exactly you're concerned about? I think I have a pretty good idea, but I'd like to be sure, just in case. If you could respond either here or on the article's talk page, I'd appreciate it. Cheers! Indrek (talk) 23:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Article requests on the Japanese WikipediaHi, Solarra! I notice that you are fluent in Japanese. Do you edit on the Japanese Wikipedia? Do you do "article requests"? There are some articles that I would like to have started on the Japanese Wikipedia, and I would like to see which ones you are interested in. Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 07:44, 20 April 2013 (UTC) Thank youThank you Solarra for your contributions for the article Percy Williams but you made a mistake by reverting one of the edits where the vandal replaced "Percy Williams" with "Prabash Akmeemana", so I reverted your last edit because that caption is obviously not true, but thanks for keeping Wikipedia vandal free! PBASH607 (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC) Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:16:10#outdated". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 23:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC) Help test new SuggestBot designWe have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC) ThanksHey Solarra, thanks for suggestions on 9 April 2013 (UTC). Have a great day ! Archmarch (talk) 04:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC) Raymond Ibrahim article editing conflict resolutionYour recent edits suggest that you might have something to contribute to the resolution of an editing conflict on the Raymond Ibrahim article. Your comments at talk:Raymond Ibrahim would be appreciated. Thanks.Mavigogun (talk) 10:10, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I hate to bring you bad news but...I hate to be the bringer of bad news to somebody as cheery and upbeat as you Solarra but your name's been mentioned at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#16:10 I'm sure you'll be fine. Get out there and show them why you're one of Wikipedia's awesome! MIVP - (Can I Help? ◕‿◕) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) - (Cakes) 17:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Wee Small HoursHey Solarra, Thanks for your message regarding Sinatra's In the Wee Small Hours. I admit that I do not quite understand how the citation coding works, but I do have a link that shows the album listed as 101 on Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time, not 100 as the page said before and now does again. Thanks, Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.87.216.41 (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your third opinion. Could you please clarify, at Talk:London_Millennium_Funicular#Survey, which new title you are supporting? The original proposal was Millennium Bridge Inclinator, and the editor who commented before you proposed Millennium Bridge Inclined Lift. Thanks. PamD 07:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Busabout Wagga WaggaMany thanks for your balanced third opinion on Busabout Wagga Wagga, and breaking the impasse.Mo7838 (talk) 09:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:21, 1 May 2013 (UTC) about oggy and the cockroachesokay ... i wanna to know , is that u for changing oggy and the cockroaches season 5 soon?? and they will taliking etchother because ... when i ask to official oggy and the cockroaches fan page on facebook and they say "no , besides oggy season 4 just reallesed " thnks
Free image Roger EbertCould you provide any free image of Roger Ebert for Wikipedia:Deceased_Wikipedians/2013#Roger_Ebert_.28Rebert.29? --Tito Dutta (contact) 00:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page. IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation. Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. Changes to SuggestBot's suggestionsWe have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC) |
