User talk:Solino

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

AfD nomination of List of some notable dancers[edit]

I have nominated List of some notable dancers, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of some notable dancers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Roleplayer (talk) 21:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

That's what Category:Dancers is for, as suggested in the AfD nomination. To say that some are "the best" or better than others is just your point of view and that's not what Wikipedia is about. -- Roleplayer (talk) 21:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
That's why it's unmanageable - to have that amount of information in a single list about every dancer would be too much, but to start selecting based on ability, as you appear to be suggesting would be extremely subjective. The only way the article could be kept in all reality is if it's a list of names, with the information contained within the articles. -- Roleplayer (talk) 22:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

White Zombie[edit]

Hmmm, that is a good point. I hadn't noticed that. I do feel "heavy metal" isn't necessary, as I explained, but maybe if some more sources for "groove metal" could be found, what I looked at isn't comprehensive by any means. And I'm not trying to deny sources, it's just 6 genres does seem a bit much and the most commonly used terms should be represented fairly. If good sources for groove metal can't be found, then it would suggest the fault lies in the "groove metal" page. After all, it's an unsourced claim. Prophaniti (talk) 19:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


If you want to remove hard rock, go for it. Likewise, if you want to include alt. metal, all you need do is find some good sourcing. I use talk pages plenty, but only when there's more than can reasonably be said in an edit summary. Here it's just a simple matter of sourcing. Prophaniti (talk) 22:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


Hmm, well if it's something like that, with a talk page where the responses just seem to have dried up, you could try asking at request for comment, where you can specifically ask for people to contribute to a talk page. You could also ask at a related wikiproject, like wikiproject Evanescence, or wikiproject rock, or wikiproject metal. It's under the scope of all of those. Prophaniti (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

System of a Down[edit]

Thank you for wanting to help find a consensus with more editors on this article. I look forward to the RFC.--SKATER Speak. 21:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


Alternative hip hop is a subgenre of hip hop music. Britpop is a subgenre of Alternative rock. (Sugar Bear (talk) 20:29, 16 May 2010 (UTC))

Right about alternative hip hop. But britpop is used in many pages. and the style is quite different. e.g. Alternative metal is a subgenre of heavy metal, but we see alt metal in many pages. But about alternative hip hop you're right. Only some fans are very tough about gorillaz not being confused with hip hop bands. but the term alt hip hop is not usually used in wiki.

Between the Buried and Me[edit]

Didn't I tell you to end your genre warring months ago? I highly suggest you end your disruptions, otherwise it will be really bad if you continue. • GunMetal Angel 04:23, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Quit warning. Any sourced genre can be put there. And you are no one to give me warnings. All the edits done for improving an article are good faith edits. And if I accepted your talk last time, it was nice of me. Because what I put there is completely sourced. Again: quit warning.Solinothe Wolf 09:53, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
That genre was not sourced; and anyone is to give anyone warnings if they're being as disruptive as you are. • GunMetal Angel 15:48, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
sourced before. Metal observer, Heavymetal.about, and found this one just now: . Anyways I don't like fighting with you again and again. I feel you don't like progressive death to be there (NPOV?). So if you are ok with progressive death to be there tell me (enough source?), if not, it's ok.Solinothe Wolf 21:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Cleanup[edit]

Hello, Solino.

You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion.
To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:56, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

June 2016[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Deftones. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

This is not edit warring. WP:GF. Art rock did not have a single correct citation and I will keep removing unsourced information. Removing unsourced information from articles does not need consensus: WP:V, WP:CS, WP:NPOV, WP:Truth.
And reverting my fixes numerous times is indeed an edit war. I assume the edit war is because of Deftones fans' biased point of view. Anyhow, I will keep doing what I believe is legit and correct according to all WP guidelines. If you are a Deftones fan and you are keen to add art rock, please consider finding multiple sources for that genre (WP:RSUW,WP:Truth) before engaging in edit wars and using all the power at your disposal to bully others. Thanks. Solinothe Wolf 10:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
For what it is worth I have given a warning to the other user involved. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 20:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I still do believe knowingly insisting on adding unsourced material to an article is edit warring, not reverting those. The genre they kept adding have zero sources. So I do believe I was bullied. I'm happy that right now they accepted to remove the unsourced genre, after I was blocked though. And thank you for reviewing my request. I appreciate giving warnings to other users who kept adding the unsourced material without going out of their way to actually finding reliable sources for that genre, which I asked them to do so again and again.Solinothe Wolf 20:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deftones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Art metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)