User talk:SrpskiAnonimac

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, SrpskiAnonimac, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Götaland. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 15:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Undiscussed move(s)[edit]

I moved back an article to the name Klokot (you previously moved it to Klokot (settlement)). Such a move was not useful for two reasons: (a) there is nothing else titled "Klokot" in Wikipedia, so there is nothing to disambiguate, (b) even if there were an article about Bosnian Klokot, this one is clearly a WP:primary topic. Similar thing happened with your move of Vitina to Vitina (town), it was loved back by Amakuru. Please, do not make such moved in the future. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kovač (Pljevlja), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kovači. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Undiscussed move(s) again[edit]

I see that you are again moving pages without any discussion and contrary to Wikipedia policies. You moved Kovačica to Kovačica (town) although the town is the clear WP:Primary topic and does not need any disambiguation. Please, move it back. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Romanov listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Romanov. Since you had some involvement with the Romanov redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:16, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop changing primary topic redirects[edit]

Please stop changing redirects like Romanov and Habsburg to point to disambiguation pages without discussion. These are well-established redirects in accordance with the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC guideline. If you think an individual redirect should be changed because it is not actually the primary topic, please use WP:RM to discuss the move. Technically, the correct solution in such a case is to propose to move the disambiguation page to the primary topic title. That is, you should propose to move Habsburg (disambiguation), not change the target of Habsburg. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC) '

Requesting a move in the future[edit]

Hello. In response to this message, I discussed Pontus with another person, who performed the move. If you like, you can try WP:RMTR, which takes your request on moves that do not require discussion. WP:RM#CM process can be used if a move requires or needs a discussion. --George Ho (talk) 09:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: KK Swisslion Takovo Lions Vrsac[edit]

Hello SrpskiAnonimac. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of KK Swisslion Takovo Lions Vrsac, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not a reason for speedy deletion, use WP:RFD to delete. Thank you. —Kusma (t·c) 20:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

@Kusma: That are two different names for KK Radnički Kragujevac:
  1. KK Kondivik Vršac
  2. KK Lions Vršac
  3. KK Swisslion Takovo Vršac
  4. KK Radnički Kragujevac
--SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 21:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
That is a good argument for deletion via WP:RFD, but not sufficient for speedy deletion without discussion. —Kusma (t·c) 05:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

RFD[edit]

Hi! I imagine that with this edit you could have been meaning to nominate a redirect for discussion. If that is indeed the case, you should follow the instruction at the top of WP:RFD. But please note that Aramaic (disambiguation) is not a redirect and hence RfD isn't the place for discussing it. Maybe it was instead a requested move that you had in mind? – Uanfala 23:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Superfluous hatnotes[edit]

I have again reverted the hatnotes you added to Mandarin Chinese and Standard Chinese. As outlined at Wikipedia:Hatnote, the purpose of a hatnote is to help a reader who has arrived at an article by mistake find the article they were searching for. No-one who searches for "Mandarin Chinese" or "Standard Chinese" would actually be looking for any of the other things listed at Mandarin (disambiguation) (see WP:NAMB). Kanguole 23:48, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Dragaš (disambiguation)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Dragaš (disambiguation), SrpskiAnonimac!

Wikipedia editor Anoptimistix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating a disambiguation page. Happy editing

To reply, leave a comment on Anoptimistix's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Anoptimistix "Message Me" 15:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Ancient Age[edit]

I'm not so sure I agree with your move of the Ancient Age article and redirecting that title to Ancient history. I rather doubt that people encounter "Ancient Age" (with capitalization of the word "Age") very often when they aren't talking about whiskey. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Kosovo municipalities[edit]

Hi. Please refrain from re-populating the infobox template of the selected Kosovo municipalities articles with native name in Serbian and Albanian language. Such information is already given in the lead section of the article, and it makes infoboxes less readable with duplication of content as it is in the case of North Mitrovica: [[1]].--AirWolf talk 22:42, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Gana (nickname) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Gana (nickname), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 03:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Međureč) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Međureč, SrpskiAnonimac!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please only add entries if they have an English article or meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Sevojno[edit]

Hi! I have noticed your recent edits on Sevojno's article. Please, do not remove or replace "urban municipality" settlement descriptions with "city municipality" or such. The correct form for (in Serbian) "gradska opština" is "urban municipality" and not the latter. I have made the same mistake a while ago when editing Belgrade's urban and suburban municipalities. Also, we should reflect the recent (2013) administrative changes, which made Sevojno one of the two urban municipalities of the city of Užice. If you have any questions, leave me a message on my talk page. Bye!--AirWolf talk 12:05, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Municipalities[edit]

It is not up to me to rename (move) these articles, but I have request administrator's action about it. Thanks for the notice.--AirWolf talk 16:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I have requested administrator's action for these articles that we have discussed about. It should be done soon. As far as for capitalization of letters in "urban/suburban municipality", in my opinion there shouldn't be a capitalization, only if it happens to be the first letter in a sentence or a title. Bye.--AirWolf talk 15:42, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Instead, after some revision, we should stick to the city municipalities until some discussion about the proper translation of "gradska opština" (in Serbian) starts. For any suggestions, please write at my talk page.--AirWolf talk 20:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Tatars[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Edit Summary example: links--Quisqualis (talk) 02:14, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Tribes of Montenegro[edit]

I've just tried to correct an edit you made quite a while ago to language templates at Tribes of Montenegro, because the {{lang-sr}} template was complaining about italicized text in the parameter. I'm not sure if what I've done reflects what you intended, can you take a look? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

May 2018[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Kovačevič. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. Matthew_hk tc 08:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Voisava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vojislava (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

I noticed your recent edit to York 9 FC does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:39, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Marking sensitive edits as minor[edit]

Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor".

In particular, marking this change to Gjilan as *minor* will raise eyebrows. The proper description of places in Kosovo has been the subject of nationalist edit warring in the past. Consider posting at Talk:Gjilan to see if others support your change. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:46, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Indic languages (disambiguation)[edit]

Notice

The article Indic languages (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Indic languages redirects to Indo-Aryan languages which begins with the hatnote:

"Indic languages" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Languages of India.

This disambiguation page thus looks like an overkill, especially since there's little evidence that the term "Indic language" is often mistakenly used to refer to a language spoken in India.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 16:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Henry of Wales listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Henry of Wales. Since you had some involvement with the Henry of Wales redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Sveti Andrija, Komiža[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. SrpskiAnonimac, thanks for creating Sveti Andrija, Komiža!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 13:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 21:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
You've continued to edit, but not respond. Communication is mandatory when other editors raise concerns about your editing. Where did you get the information for the article? Boleyn (talk) 06:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
@Boleyn: I wrote it, similar to the written articles about the villages in Croatia, what? .... I don't know English, I translation through translators .... I'm sorry I did not answer you earlier --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 10:21, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for replying. What was your source? Boleyn (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
I do not understand this for the "source" ... I made that article because he was not the only one here Sveti Andrija (disambiguation) --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 12:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Where did you get the information from? The information you wrote in the article, Sveti Andrija, Komiža? Boleyn (talk) 13:18, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
@Boleyn: Wikipedia on Croatian language --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 14:09, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
I redirected the article to Svetac, which covers the historical population of its only village in more detail. Even if it were still inhabited, I don't think we need separate articles on a tiny island and its only settlement. No such user (talk) 14:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
@Boleyn: the island is a island, the village is a village....on Croatian Wikipedia and other Wikipedias, articles are separated....the island is called Svetac (the domestic Chakavian name for Svetac is Štondrija), village - Sveti Andrija --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 15:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
I didn't redirect it, but I am not surprised that this happened as it was so short and unsourced. Croatian Wikipedia has sources (Izvori) but when you copied the article you didn't add them. Thanks for your work on this, Boleyn (talk) 19:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
@Boleyn:, @No such user: in the article for the island there are categories related to the island, in the article for the village - categories for the village....and in both articles there are different templates--SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 21:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Meh. Of what use for a reader is the infobox and category for an uninhabited village, with a dozen abandoned houses, located on a 2-km long island? At least the information in the island article provides context and information about its history. By the way, they have the same official name — Sveti Andrija – and the island's article resides on the more commonly recognized name, Svetac. I won't edit-war on it, but creating such articles is a pretty lame business. No such user (talk) 06:57, 13 July 2018 (UTC)