User talk:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

deprodded JYJ Euro tour 2014[edit]

Hello. I deprodded JYJ Euro tour 2014 and then, after doing so, realized my mistake. The article is a hoax. I apologize! I have AFD'd it now. If you want to join in, please do so. :) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JYJ Euro tour 2014 Shinyang-i (talk) 03:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Tour comments[edit]

If you are good with understanding concert and tour notability requirements, I beg of you to comment on some of the other tours listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Korea. We have a lack of quality commenters on them who can cite policy, and it's getting worse. There is so much anger and resistance to any attempt to remove anything related to kpop. Here's a handy list, if you're so inclined:

If you decide to contribute, I thank you! Have a great day! Shinyang-i (talk) 05:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Flor Silvestre albums[edit]

Why are you redirecting most of the articles of Flor Silvestre's albums? They are notable and contained many successful songs; that's why I created those articles. I was also planning to find verifiable references about those albums and their songs. Please, let me undo your changes so that I can add verifiable references about their notability (I'll wait for your reply). Thank you. --V. Villalvaso 20:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

It is best to create such articles in your userspace or sandbox first (such as User:OsotedeMonte/Flor Silvestre con el Mariachi México), find the required references, then add the articles to the encyclopedia. Just be sure your references come from reliable sources (not eBay or a site that only shows a photo of the album). Good luck. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention[edit]

Can you explain this please? MadGuy7023 (talk) 23:23, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Hooked on Classics[edit]

A couple of things - I don't think Hooked on Classics 1 should be marked as "low" priority. It was on the charts for a length of time, and given its ubiquitous placement in flea markets, thrift stores, and dollar bins, any album collector is familiar with it. I was going to contest the speedy of HOC 4, it has an AllMusic entry and all, but on the whole I think you're right (I've *never* seen a copy), but rather than deletion I would suggest a re-direct to Hooked on Classics (series). Thanks! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

  • An Allmusic listing without even a tracklist, much less a review, means nothing. But the assessment should remain low unless/until its importance is emphasized/verified in the article by reliable sources. No album should have higher than a "Low"-importance assessment if there are no references listed. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
    • I have a cordial difference of opinion, perhaps. The Albums importance scale mentions likelihood of readers being familiar with the subject, and the likelyhood of there being reliable secondary sources. In this instance, I think both are higher than a "low" priority would indicate. (not to mention the absolute lack of current sources, I'll try to fix that a little bit... in a little bit). Anyway, thanks for the reply, and even more thanks for all the hard work you do around here which mostly goes unrecognized. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


I understand, but the policy is unambiguous: it only applies to content that has already been deleted, and it "excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version". No administrator has the right to extend an XFD's decision beyond the content that was discussed at it. Unless you can find evidence that this specific page was previously deleted at XFD, it must not be deleted as G4. Nyttend (talk) 22:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Songs by album[edit]

Any thoughts on this new category and sub set? Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Bad. It's either a unnecessary subdivision of Category:Songs by artist or will lead to overcategorization if one decides to include later compilations as well. One will already be able to link from every song from the album article plus the ones that have been created already have a multipe album templates (e.g. {{The Dark Side of the Moon}} and {{The Dark Side of the Moon tracks}}) in each song article that aid in this type of navigation. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
We agree, would you like to do the honors? --Richhoncho (talk) 20:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
I would but can't do it now as I'm headed out (Super Bowl parties and all, y'know. :))

Songs by theme categories[edit]

I'm thinking of recreating the Category:Songs about rain, or perhaps at least Category:Songs about weather. I'm curious as to what makes one Category:Songs by theme category notable and another not notable. I'd bet that if I looked sufficiently thoroughly I could find a publication discussing songs about rain. Thoughts? - Bossanoven (talk) 01:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

The problem with such a category is that one ends up putting articles in there simply because a song has "rain" in the category even though the song only uses rain as an allegory rather than truly being about rain. Note that List of songs about rain was also deleted, so I'm not sure a recreation of the category will fly. I recommend talking to some people who participated in those discussions. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Why'd you have to speedy all of this stuff? :( - Bossanoven (talk) 15:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

They've been through a deletion discussion before. As there is no improvement of what previously existed, it doesn't need to be rehashed. If you add your reason why they shouldn't be deleted on the talk pages, the speedy request might be removed and a new CfD would have to take place. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


Thanks for your addition. You could have just asked me to source it if you wanted one, though, I am referring to reliable sources for these additions. Regards, - Bossanoven (talk) 05:11, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Understood. Problem is, today's Bubbling Under Chart isn't truly an extension of the Hot 100, so saying something reached 105 isn't accurate because songs can't fall back into the Bubbling Under chart once they've hit the Hot 100. You can say it peaked at No. 5 on the Bubbling Under the Hot 100 chart. I don't know what the rules were back in 1967, so I wanted to provide a link to the primary source to indicate that is how Billboard itself displayed the info, as opposed to say a Joel Whitburn book or the like. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 05:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

If you wish to do some more sourcing, I have spotted a bunch of Bubbling Under 100s on Parliament discography and Funkadelic discography. - Bossanoven (talk) 05:21, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Also, The Zombies discography has several. - Bossanoven (talk) 05:38, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Paralympic track and field athletes of Canada[edit]

I moved the speedy discussion to a full discussion at CSD now. Please comment there if you can. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


You are a really fast typer/worker. I learned a few things just by looking at your edits. Thank You. also, I think the asterisks was an old reference style. Either way that was cool. (talk) 08:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of categories[edit]

Question: Why did you delete categories for two Joseph Csaky sculptures and one Archipenko sculpture? Coldcreation (talk) 09:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

My bad. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 09:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Request for your opinion[edit]

Good morning Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars! I noticed you've edited a topic related to Jimmy Edgar somewhat recently, and was hoping to collect viewpoints on an aesthetic issue. If you had a minute to contribute to the discussion/vote on the infobox photo, that would be very helpful. Earflaps (talk) 11:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Any ideas... Merle Haggard edits[edit]

I've tried leaving a message on Besmircher's Talk page about his/her edits for the Merle Haggard discography to no avail. I am trying to clean up the pages but I can't keep up! Airproofing (talk) 05:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

CSD mislabeled[edit]

Hi, you placed a {{db-c1}} tag on Category:2008 elections in New Zealand and Category:Sri Lanka Mitra Vibhushana. This is a problem because that tag is for categories that are empty, with no associated articles or parent categories which was not the case here. Please only use this tag on categories that are empty and that are not maintenance categories (necessary categories even if they are empty). Also, do not depopulate a category (remove the category from articles) in order to place an empty tag on it. Thanks so much for the work you do, I hope this explanation helps. Liz Read! Talk! 19:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

7 Horns 7 Eyes (EP)[edit]

Hello, SCSNLW (1st letters of each word) I was wondering why you agreed to delete my article on 7 Horns 7 Eyes (Self-titled EP). It is notable because its line-up contains the original vocalist, drummer, and guitarist. It also dates their first release. Metalworker14 (talk) 1:59 P.M. 02/25/2015

  • How does containing the original vocalist, drummer, and guitarist make an EP notable. Please read the guideline WP:N and more specifically for albums, WP:NALBUMS. If you believe EP was deleted for invalid reasons, you can request a deletion review. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:24, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Elijah Blake[edit]

Hello, why did you just re-create Elijah Blake? This article has been speedied and PRODded [1] and it's been declined at AfC [2]. It also has a history of editing by sockpuppets with undeclared COIs, in violation the TOU. Why? Logical Cowboy (talk) 23:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

  • I never heard of the man before today, but a bio on Allmusic, a piece in Billboard about his first EP, and a full writeup in Complex Magazine seems like adequate coverage to at least warrant a stub. The guy has written songs for multiple well-known artists including Climax and has mentions in multiple articles. Feel free to AfD it. I won't be offended. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:24, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Nine Lashes albums[edit]

Category:Nine Lashes albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:01, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you! ;-)[edit]

Premium Reviewer Barnstar Hires.png The Premium Reviewer Barnstar
Dear friend; Face-smile.svg
Thank you so much for doing such a great job cleaning up the many inconsistencies that remained in the set of articles I created in recent weeks. I particularly appreciated your wikification of the 'Track lists' and the removal of my earlier over-categorization.
I will apply the same principles in all my future articles; thank you once again for showing me the way.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk) 01:11, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
PS: Your user page looks quite forlorn, if not abandoned; I therefore hope you are not an ultra-reclusive exopedian, and that you will welcome this expression of my appreciation of your help to me today. Face-wink.svg
  • Thank you for the Barnstar. I welcome feedback and discussion on my talk page but my user page remains blank by choice. I'm mainly a patroller of album articles and related categories and templates, delving into other areas on occasion to wherever other wikilinks may take me. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: You're most welcome, and thanks once again; I'll keep you in mind for future albums!
As for your user page, I suspected as much, but thought I'd just tease you a little about it... Face-wink.svg; hope you didn't mind.
Thanks again for all your great help today, and all you're doing in support of our encyclopaedia! Face-smile.svg
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk) 01:37, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Fathom That/Fools Dance[edit]

Hi, First off, I saw that you redirected the Fathom That article that I started back to Peace and Silence a couple weeks ago. I totally understand why you did it. I got no problem with that. I went ahead and restored the album details to the Peace and Silence article, which was what I had originally done before starting a separate article. Even though I've had separate articles for Fools Dance (EP) and They'll Never Know for years now, I'm thinking at some point maybe I should just redirect those back to the band page and incorporate the details for those two mini-albums with that like I've done with Fathom That by Peace and Silence. When you have a moment, I was wondering if you would care to take a look at what I've done with Peace and Silence and give me your .02 on how it looks. Any suggestions as to what I should do with the Fools Dance pages would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. :) Shaneymike (talk) 02:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


I haven't done a lot of work on categories, I'm curious as to why you are deleting Hard rock songs from a large number of music articles. If you have time to explain i'd appreciate it. Best wishes Flat Out let's discuss it 11:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Per WP:SUBCAT, a page should rarely be placed in both a category and a subcategory or parent category (supercategory) of that category. For example, the article "Highway to Hell (song)" need only be placed in "Category:AC/DC songs", not in both "Category:AC/DC songs" and "Category:Hard rock songs". Since the first category (AC/DC songs) is in the second category (hard rock songs), readers are already given the information that "Highway to Hellj" is a hard rock song by it being an AC/DC song. In another way of looking at it, when I go to Category:Hard rock songs, if every article was categorized by a genre, there'd be 1000s of articles in this category without any connection to the title and the artist (unless disambiguated in the title), but diffusion by artist, allows me to easier navigate to songs by other hard rock music groups, such as Category:Def Leppard songs or Category:Kiss (band) songs. This way of categorizing is also recommended by the WikiProject for songs. Some IPs late last year attempted to overcategorize many song articles by every genre listed in their infoboxes when, in most cases, those genre categories are already a parent to the artist's song category, and I have been attempting to clean that up. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Excellent! Thanks, I appreciate it. Flat Out let's discuss it 22:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Official Album Streaming Chart[edit]

I don't see why it should be deleted as it is a brand new chart which has only just been launched and it is part of the UK charts like UK Singles Chart and UK Albums Chart for example. In the coming weeks, that list will expand as more albums top the streaming chart. Deleting this would be like deleting every other chart which is a part of OCC.

Except most of those other charts you can find coverage in reliable 3rd party sources. If you think the article should exist, you should take your complaint to deletion review. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Merging Brit Awards 2015 (album) into 2015 Brit Awards article[edit]

I've left a message on the talk page of the above article – completely agree with your suggestion that it should be merged into the parent article. Same goes for the respective 2014 album and awards articles. Richard3120 (talk) 23:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Now 54 US[edit]

The article has enough coverage thank you very much. All sources provided ie. Amazon and facebook all have tracklist details. If you think I'm making up the tracklist, you are wrong. I don't lie about album track listings. Every article which I contribute a tracklist to is an official tracklist, not a fake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

The fact that you keep removing the NOW 54 link makes it hard to believe you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

The B-52's Time Capsule: Videos for a Future Generation 1979–1998[edit]

Back in January 2014 you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been now been requested on the article talk page, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Permission to block me from editing[edit]

Can you please never block me from editing? I absolutely love to put jokes into Wikipedia articles & make them blank. (talk) 21:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

@ That is exactly for what you are blocked, and this isn't a joke. Wikipedia permits any user to edit because it wants everyone should participate and impart information they know, not so that pages can be blanked and replaced with jokes.--Kashish Arora (talk) 03:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

The user Kamalelsayedmohamed and the Fadl Shaker pages[edit]

Okay this guy has been having a odd history of getting rid of the afds of them (as well as putting living people on the albums and changing the redirects to pages for this artist), wanted to point this out as I saw you with some of his edits! Here: Wgolf (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Fallen Angel (Versailles Suicide EP)[edit]

Hello I am writing to find out why you feel the Demo Album of this band should be deleted and redirected. Sources have been sited on the page. Seriously I would like to know your reason. Please give me some help rather than just continuing to redirect. Thank you. "Fails" is not a valid response when referring to citiations perhaps contributing would be more helpful. User:Tinylittlebird (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

  • I redirected it two months ago and never requested deletion. However, the only source I see is a primary source, which hardly establishes notability for this EP, so I added a notability tag. And I didn't say the album fails, I said the album fails the notability requirements of established guidelines of Wikipedia. You may want to read them yourself. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Songs from a Dead City There are other bands listed on wikipedia who have demo CD's with only 1 Ref that is a primary source, here is an example. I don't see how that is any different. It seems as though you have something personal against this band. You have redirected all the pages no matter how many sources have been listed. (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
    • The redirects were mostly done by another user, but you haven't contacted them. I surely don't have anything against this band since I've only heard of them because of Wikipedia. I also have never come across that article you mention, so how would I know it even exists in order to redirect it, but you're probably right - it also doesn't meet notability requirements. When articles are redirected, you are free to revert the redirects, but if reliable sources cannot be found, it's possible it might be taken to WP:AFD, where the community will come to a consensus on whether the article should remain or be deleted. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)


Hey, can you explain these: Category:As It Is albums, Category:As It Is (band) albums. One of them should be deleted. I can see by other similar categories that the "(band)" version is used a lot but it doesn't make any sense to me since non-bands do not tend to publish albums so the "disambiguation" seems unnecessary. This seems like a bigger problem, may we should take it to some talk page like Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums? :/ — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

  • I tend to agree but because of the ambiguity and because of precedent through numerous category for discussion debates, it has become common practice to simply match the category with the name of the article for that music artist. It has become so common, these changes have become "speediable" under Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Speedy renaming and merging. For example, Category:New Model Army (band) albums was moved from Category:New Model Army albums over a year ago following a speedy request. I doubt anyone would think that the New Model Army would have released any albums, but it has become the convention for naming such categories. I encourage you to continue this discussion and express your concerns on this matter at the WikiProject. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:54, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Also, empty categories can be speedily deleted under {{db-c1}} criteria. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for finding the discussions, I guess that matter is settled then. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Rating vs. Review[edit]

Thanks so much for your ongoing series of fixes on the Vitro album articles. As it happens, one of the most glaring and recurrent of these - i.e. distinguishing Allmusic ratings from reviews (at least in terms of authorship) - is of particular interest to me, in that an undeniable and all too frequently observed disparity btw the two has long been a source of puzzlement to me (naively, perhaps, assuming that one provides the rationale for the other) - especially as I've never seen any corresponding disclaimer attached to either.

In any event, your claim is presented so authoritatively that I couldn't help wondering if you might not be affiliated with Rovi/AM yourself, or at least know someone who is/was. If so (or if you have some other source unknown to me), please enlighten me as to how, and in what order, the AM ratings and reviews come to be. Armed with such knowledge, I would be more than happy to clean up after my own 'mess' at any number of previously created pages, and, better still, to avoid such tedium for all concerned, going forward. Thanks again for your work. DavidESpeed (talk) 22:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

  • I have no connection to Rovi or AllMusic. The FAQ page on AllMusic implies that their editors rate the albums, not those who review the albums. It even suggests ratings can change overtime, while the review will stay the same. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

So Fresh?[edit]

Ok, I apologize if I sound a little steamed here, but why re-direct "So Fresh: The Hits of Autumn 2014"? If that had to be re-directed, than all of the other "So Fresh" albums should be re-directed due to them being as notable, or less notable than this album. And why just this certain album? And no, I'm not doing the whole other stuff exists shtick. Just asking as to why? Shall we keep that one available? Or shall we re-direct the whole album series? - ilovechristianmusic (Talk to me!) 21:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

You agree they should be redirected but you create another article for another volume that has no more notability than any other. Many others have been redirected but often get reverted back to articles by editwarring IPs who want them to stay. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 04:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No, I agree that if one album that is as/more (I say this because some albums in the series have no references.) notable as this certain album is re-directed, then the series should be re-directed. And to answer you, I wouldn't have created the article if I would have known it would have been re-directed. No one else seemed to have a problem with the past articles I created. Again, why did you re-direct this certain album out of the series that is as much notable than the rest? One more question for you. What would you think if we re-directed the series back to the "So Fresh" page, and added a reference to a retailer such as iTunes or Sanity to show release date/tracklisting to avoid any more conflict? Thank you for your time. ilovechristianmusic (Talk to me!) 10:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
None of the individual volumes are truly notable, so why create something that isn't notable just because you see articles exist for other non-notable albums? If you look at the edit history of So Fresh: The Hits of Winter 2012, you'll see I have attempted to redirect other volumes of the series going back over a year ago. IPs revert it and I'm not going to get in an edit war with them. You'll notice that some of these pages end up getting protected because of those IPs. So the best thing to do is to stop creating more of these articles unless notability (ie. "significant coverage in multiple reliable sources") can be established. A link solely to an iTunes listing for each volume on the main page will just make the page just as bad as the NOW discography page, which also should be completely revamped. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
I didn't look back that far. I won't be making any more of the "So Fresh" album pages. I understand completely now. I do agree with you about the NOW discography page. Thank you for all of your help. ilovechristianmusic (Talk to me!) 13:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Elijah Blake for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elijah Blake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah Blake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)


I tagged you for your opinion at The Fool. Your insight on this would be highly appreciated. Ilovechristianmusic (talk) 18:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Finally (CeCe Peniston song)#Request for comment[edit]

You were one of editors of the article. I invite you to an RFC discussion. --George Ho (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Jackin' For Beats[edit]

Hello. I have recently taken interest in your article for the Jackin' For Beats Mixtape. I am looking to get some feedback on a possible edit I am going to make. Since all of the instrumentals are produced by other producers/artists, I feel it should be necessary to put the original producers name in "Producers" and remove the original artist's name from "Title". NotYourAverageEnglishStudent (talk) 19:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hello My Name Is (album)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Hello My Name Is (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fitnr 18:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:Numismatic coins of Russia[edit]

Category:Numismatic coins of Russia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 23:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

I Owe You A Apology[edit]

I take responsibility for turning into a sockpuppet. I have decided that I am not going to post anything else and if you want you can delete the Rhythmic category.Robert Moore (talk) 04:27, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Robert Moore


Hey, thanks for recently rating Anus (Alaska Thunderfuck 5000 album) and Hieeee, as you have done with a large majority of the article's I've created, I really appreciate it. Can I question why Hieeee received a stub-class rating? Reading the quick description of the class, I'd protest that the article is "all very-bad-quality" the article details the composition, critical reception, music video and chart history of the song, and all sections are referenced. I suppose as opposed to whining, I could ask how I could notch it up to Start-Class? Any help appreciated, thanks. Azealia911 talk 18:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Assessments are purely subjective and while there are multiple sections, the content was minimal. Definitely one of those borderline calls in which case I tend to stay conservative just so it has at least received an assessment. I will take a closer look when I have a little more time. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:52, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

So Fine (Sean Paul song)[edit]

Can you re-create a chart citation? Because I can't do that. (talk) 11:02, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Chicka Chicka Boom Boom[edit]

Hi Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, thankyou for recently deleting wikiproject songs from the above article's talkpage with the comment "book". The reason i added wikiproject songs was the article also discusses an album based on the book, see Chicka Chicka Boom Boom. (There was a separate article but it was merged.) I have now added wikiproject album instead, hope this is okay. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:37, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


Hi there, I'm not sure there is anything that can be done here either. However, after repeating myself over-and-over again in edit summaries, he has now started putting song titles in quotations, so anything is possible. I have repeatedly mentioned about checking to see if his links are correct before saving, but he's still adding wrong links everywhere. I'm more concerned about the statement[3] he left on his talk page in reply to comments you left there. He seems to think it's ok to add his observations to articles. Cmr08 (talk) 19:20, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi again, you may want to check my talk page. I'm pretty sure there is a message there intended for you as a reply to the message you left there. Cmr08 (talk) 03:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Heavy Crown[edit]

Hi, I just expanded Heavy Crown (song), how's it looking now? Azealia911 talk 02:59, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your recent edit to the page, but when I asked how it looked, I meant in the context of weather it passed notability, due to the notice you placed on the page. It features multiple third-party sources, and passes point one of WP:NSONGS. Azealia911 talk 03:08, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

  • I understand what you were asking. I was only making an additional edit that required revision. Typically, songs that are mentioned in the context of reviews for the whole album are best merged and redirected to the album. It's a decent stub for now and I'll check on it again in a few days before removing the notability tag myself. It could be helpful to include some not-so-positive reviews as it is doubtful that the song has received universally glowing reviews. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 03:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

It Sure Was Good[edit]

The song is notable precisely for the relationship between the Jones and Wynette. The contradiction between the song and their personal relationship makes it significant.

Chart succession boxes[edit]

I've been adding succession boxes to denote the UK #1 single at any given time. However, you keep deleting them and say "you need a consensus".

Check the Official Chart Company's website for yourself! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 00sClassicGamerFan (talkcontribs) 21:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

If you want to know what order songs became number one in the UK, please go to List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 2010s. You don't need a link from one #1 song to another #1 song that are completely unrelated to each other in any other way. If you do UK, you have to US, and France, and Australia, and Japan, and then you end up with this. Due to the discussion on succession boxes in song and albums, this is what people do now. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one dance singles of 2014 (U.S.)/archive1.
Message added 11:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I've added five non-Billboard published sources.  — Calvin999 11:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one dance singles of 2014 (U.S.)/archive1[edit]

If could bring your attention back to my FLC, please, as I have added third party sources. Thanks.  — Calvin999 10:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Category:Certified singles[edit]

Category:Certified singles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)