User talk:Status

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia as of September 2013.

Courtney Sloane[edit]

A site admin has already put that photo back on the page so, if you don't want it there, you should take it to the talk page.

Having said that, let's review:

  • 1.Images that show multiple elements of the list at the same time, such as a cast shot or montage for a television show, are strongly preferred over individual images. Such an image should be provided by the copyright holder or scanned/captured directly from the copyrighted work, instead of being created from multiple non-free images by the user directly (as the "extent" of use is determined by the number and resolution of non-free images, and not the number of files.)
Doesn't apply at all.
  • 2.Images which are discussed in detail in the context of the article body, such as a discussion of the art style, or a contentious element of the work, are preferable to those that simply provide visual identification of the elements.
See #1.
  • 3.An image that provides a representative visual reference for other elements in the article, such as what an alien race may look like on a science-fiction television show, is preferred over providing a picture of each element discussed.
Same as #2.
  • 4. Basically, let's just go to 5 & 6.

There is no picture of the actress on her page and she is a pretty notable character who was just involved in a high-profile murder. There's no reason why that photo shouldn't be there.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

@Cebr1979: What are the reasons the photo should be there? Other than the fact of showing what she looks like? A non-free image must serve a purpose, especially in lists; it is more lenient if the character has their own separate article. A relevant image would show her character doing something in an episode, with commentary on why that storyline is important to the year of 2013. — Status (talk · contribs) 04:19, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
She was the love of Noah's life (I don't know if you even watch the show or not so this could all be in vain but, he's a core character) and the picture did explain that. This talk has also been had through edit histories and it was decided the photo could remain so I don't see why we need to have it all over again simply because Arre9 decided (again) that she doesn't want it there. That's what talk pages are for.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
@Cebr1979: Please, feel free to discuss on the talk page why you believe that the image is needed then. I fail to see where "it was decided the photo could remain". — Status (talk · contribs) 04:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
It's right here. An admin took it down and then put it right back up. It's all good, though. We're already getting a dead body picture.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
I mean, in order to create more relevance, I guess we could go find a picture of her when she was just a dead body. Her murder is currently a big deal. I'll let the other users know.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker): sorry for the intrusion, but... Cebr, you are now grasping at straws trying to prove this character is relevant. She was a recurring character who was killed off because the new head writer promised not to kill off important characters. That should say enough about her alleged relevance. Secondly, you do realize that the admin who re-added the image was just carrying out standard procedure? That is no indication of any alleged decision that the weak image with a weak rationale should remain. — Arre 04:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
When you say characters like Angelina Veneziano and Sam Gibson require their own pages just because you created them, Arre9, you really can't expect me to pay any attention to anything you say with the words "relevant" or "notable" in them. At least Courtney was relevant enough to be killed off so characters will talk about her again... Anyways, there will be a photo. I know you won't like that (you just said so on your talk page) but, a relevant photo will be found.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:54, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Those characters (who were regulars) are relevant enough because there were enough reliable sources to create articles in the first place. If Courtney had her own article, she would warrant an image. It's not that I "won't like that". It would be fun if Wikipedia could have unlimited non-free images. But Wiki doesn't work that way. — Arre 05:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Interscope Geffen A&M.jpg[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:Interscope Geffen A&M.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

The 20/20 World Tour[edit]

Articles about tours usually have notes on the setlist section when it comes to guest singers or a variation. See On the Run Tour / Loud Tour. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 15:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

List of lists of lists[edit]

See other examples of lists please. It just isn't possible to have all this criteria be met on a list page because most of that stuff doesn't exist for lists.Cebr1979 (talk) 03:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)