User talk:Stefanculumov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome!

Hello, Stefanculumov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Dr. Mihajlio, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vianello (talk) 02:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm Jingiby. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent contributions because they didn't appear constructive. If you believe the info you have deleted was incorrect or/and biased, please discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 18:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Ambox warning pn.svg

Please, do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to IMRO. If you continue to edit pages by deliberately introducing biased and unsourced information, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits appear to be nonconstructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again and provide neutral reliable sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 05:00, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history on several articles shows that you tend currently to be engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. Jingiby (talk) 06:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at IMRO, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jingiby (talk) 11:31, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent contributionson many articles related to Macedonia, because they didn't appear to be constructive. If you continue to edit pages by deliberately introducing biased and/or unsourced information, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits appear to be non constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again and provide neutral reliable sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 15:10, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

May 2016[edit]

Hi, editors may not add their own views to articles simply because they believe them to be correct, and may not remove sources' views from articles simply because they disagree with them as you did to the article Boatmen of Thessaloniki. Wikipedia's content must be determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. Check Wikipedia:NOTTRUTH. Thanks. 46.238.25.84 (talk) 04:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)