User talk:Stephanwehner

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Stephanwehner. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 05:45, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

Hi, I noticed your edit to Blackbeard. I agree with your edit and your reasoning. If you wish to pursue it further, I might suggest that you discuss the matter on Talk:Blackbeard rather than User Talk:Parrot of Doom. If you can't come to an agreement, you might also try posting a Request for Comment. Someone on Parrot Of Doom's talk page noted that you were in the minority. And on Parrot of Doom's talk page, you are in the minority because, unlike Parrot of Doom, Nev1, Malleus, etc, you do not reside in Manchester, England, nor do you regularly come to the defense of Parrot of Doom when people disagree with him, as do Nev1, Malleus, etc. I wish you luck! --RSLxii 19:07, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words and support. I'm planning to revisit this when I have more free time. Stephanwehner (talk) 19:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Stephanwehner. You have new messages at Mr. Stradivarius's talk page.
Message added 05:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 05:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apple Campus 2[edit]

Hi there, I think this is what you want! :) - Alison ^❤ 05:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see, underscore in the page link, Apple_Campus, but spaces in the section part, Apple Campus 2. Thanks -- Stephanwehner (talk) 06:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poodles[edit]

I'm a proud poodle owner myself, but I need to say that "Proud poodle owners" is something I don't expect to see in an encyclopedia. That whole section lacks a source - is that AKC standards? The title of the section is questionable as it states as fact that that iw what poodle owners in general expect. Dougweller (talk) 12:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to your question on speed while cross-country skiing[edit]

Is in a diagram at Talk:Cross-country skiing#Speed. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 01:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Stephanwehner. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Stephanwehner. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Stephanwehner. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leaf blower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edmunds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Medicine![edit]

We at Wikiproject Medicine would like to thank you for your contribution now during the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. We are far from out of the woods with regard to the pandemic and understand that your focus may lie on coronavirus efforts.
We would still like to shine a light on our active medical community, which you are more than welcome to join. As a participant you can ask questions and get help about best practices on editing any health or medical article — on our talk-page. We are a (mostly) collegial bunch, and I do hope you feel welcome to participate. Currently there are two active communities:

Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine (talk — The general medical community)
Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19 (talk — A temporary COVID-19 community)

Please join up!

Best regards, Carl Fredrik^talk 18:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice regarding Coronavirus disease 2019[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute at Coronavirus disease 2019[edit]

Hi Stephanwehner,

the page Coronavirus disease 2019 has been protected to prevent further edit warring on a semi-protected page, between users whose experience should be high enough not to engage in such behavior. Please be more careful when the protection expires.

Thanks and best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, to preserve this for the future[edit]

At the time, the COVID-19 page was listing, in the sidebar, "other names" for the disease, including racist names like Wuhan Pneumonia, etc, terms which the likes of trump and other fascists liked to use, back then in March 2020. By now their attention-deficit-disorder has taken hold and they have moved on to other crimes against humanity.

I gave good reasons at the time for my removals. There was hardly any meaningful discussion. The above passive-aggressive notice was left after I removed those offensive entries. The wikipedia community took a long time to correct the appalling mistake, I think more than a week. As far as I can tell, whoever this "tobefree" person is, they were part of the problem. Stephanwehner (talk) 13:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Los Angeles. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 21:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, yes, I meant to edit the talk page. BTW when I read your message, I got the impression that you pasted a template message, so it seems a bit impersonal. Stephanwehner (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I use a tool called Twinkle which allows me to respond to vandalism and unconstructive editing quickly. I'm not saying your edit was either of those, but yes, the response you received is a standard template to notify editors who add commentary intended for the Talk page to the article instead. Sorry, but I don't have the time to personalize every message I leave on editors' Talk pages. General Ization ^Talk 21:38, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Jason Clause moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, New Jason Clause, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This contract clause is important to be covered in its own right. I thought it would be reasonable to give it 6 months to see how it grows organically. What is the rush?

Also you say it needs citations, and I provided one, showing how the clause appears in an actual real-life contract.

Is it possible that you triggered some button on some wikipedia app to move it to the draftspace? I have seen this happen before, and quite frankly, the button pushing really hurts people like me who are trying their best to improve wikipedia.

SO I would kindly request you to undo your action. Stephanwehner (talk) 14:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Jason Clause (April 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough for an article of its own. Consider adding eg. to General average instead. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Jason Clause and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stephanwehner! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:New Jason Clause[edit]

Hello, Stephanwehner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New Jason Clause, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:New Jason Clause[edit]

Hello, Stephanwehner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "New Jason Clause".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]