- 1 Nomination of Aspen Creek (restaurant) for deletion
- 2 OER inquiry
- 3 What's New in WikiProject Louisville (Nov 2015)
- 4 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 5 CFB North Bay
- 6 Using Refill
- 7 Cite reference formatting for sources in Deaths in 2016
- 8 MCA's pre-1950 Paramount sound feature film library
- 9 Reference errors on 12 August
Nomination of Aspen Creek (restaurant) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aspen Creek (restaurant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspen Creek (restaurant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Steve03Mills, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
What's New in WikiProject Louisville (Nov 2015)
|What's New in WikiProject Louisville? (Nov 2015)|
|Thank you for your continued membership in WikiProject Louisville! Our project is still alive and mildly kicking after over 9 years in operation. If by chance you're not up-to-date with what's going on in the project, here's some of the more recent goings-on:
If you would like to opt out of receiving WikiProject Louisville newsletters, please add your name to the "Opt out of newsletters" list on our Active participants page.
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
CFB North Bay
When you made this edit (scroll to the references section) it messed up the references. They were referencing different things so they can't all use the same name. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
|Steve03Mills is a member of WikiProject Louisville, an open collaborative effort to coordinate and develop appropriate, comprehensive and well-connected content covering metropolitan Louisville, Kentucky and related subjects in the Wikipedia.
Cite reference formatting for sources in Deaths in 2016
Hi. The regular editors over at the Deaths in 2016 page have been somewhat alarmed at some changes that have been made against the consensus for formatting references in support of entries on that page (and all related pages covering previous years). A very long time ago, it was decided by the status quo through proper debate that inline references providing the sources for each entry should be limited to a simple reference i.e. just the URL of the source and the headline used on that source page. The tooltip appearing on mouse hover in a consistently very long page would therefore be kept unfussy and very basic. It would also keep consistency when "icon formatting" foreign language sources, these also requiring basic simple references in order to function. I do appreciate that you may have gone to a lot of trouble in applying the 102 good faith changes to inline reference formatting on Deaths in 2016, but I have to let you know that those changes have been reverted in line with consensus for that page, by myself and other editors, and a discussion can be found at Talk:Deaths in 2016 if you would like to comment on any of this. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 22:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
MCA's pre-1950 Paramount sound feature film library
Hi, can you change "pre-1948" in this sentence "Like some other studios, Paramount saw little value in its film library, and sold 764 of its pre-1948 films to MCA Inc. (known today as Universal Studios Inc.) in February 1958." to "pre-1950", please? Many sources say that Paramount films from 1948 to November 1949 are included in the MCA package. Dragon'sLair83 (talk) 20:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 12 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Liborio Vidal Aguilar page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)