User talk:Steve Smith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

No Answer to Warning[edit]

[1] I will summarize my problems. If you want evidence, then I will put it on a noticeboard, because you can find it here.

  1. He voted in an offensive manner without a reason.
  2. He insisted on being offensive with a reversion.
  3. He deleted my first warning from hiz old messajez.
  4. One of his friends insisted on hiz offense with a reversion.
  5. He referred me to a guideline that does not tell me to do anything differently from what I did.
  6. He seems to think that deleting warnings is a good idea.
  7. He did not answer my warnings.

Please answer on my talk page. It iz faster that way, because I do not need to poll your page, or even know that you are awake. If I do poll your page, and I am on a different IP#, then I can look closely at colours. Also, I get one piece of spam every three months or so, and it's not because of filters. Bohgosity BumaskiL (talk) 12:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Global account[edit]

Hi Steve Smith! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 01:10, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


Please see Category:Realtors for discussion on renaming Hugo999 (talk) 00:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Precious again[edit]

Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg

Alberta politicians
Thank you, Steve, practising the law of expending a "great deal of intellectual energy" on (almost) nothing but content, for quality articles on Alberta politicians such as Alexander Cameron Rutherford and Premiership of John Edward Brownlee, for replacing red links by stubs and creating articles on historic Edmonton elections, for "I can safely say that this article isn't a waste of FAC reviewers' time", - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (27 December 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 910th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 910 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 26, 2015[edit]

A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. It mostly follows the lead section; how does it look? - Dank (push to talk) 02:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for that one! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)