User talk:Stonnman

There were complaints about some nonpublic personal information in the article. Besides, it doesn't meet our inclusion criteria. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 04:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your email, relevant policy is at WP:LIVING and WP:BIO. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 15:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are several important differences. First, Liberace's birth name is well known and is documented in numerous reliable sources, and as such it is not nonpublic. Second, Liberace is dead and therefore our protective policies that apply specifically to living people, e.g. WP:LIVING, don't apply. Third, as you note, Liberace is clearly notable and there is no serious doubt that he merits an article. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 17:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Stonnman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback.
Message added 18:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ukexpat (talk) 18:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stonnman: I am not used to using the Wikipedia pages other than bare minumum, so I hope I am placing this answer in the right spot. You asked why I have deleted the link to Dan Kester's genealogy site for "Baum". It is because I am Valora Noland, and wasn't raised in the Jewish Culture.

I ran across an article in my old c.1970 14th edition Encyclopaedia Britannica under "Jews", and the article begins: "Contrary to popular opinion, there is no Jewish race." It was written by Raphael Patai when he was working for Herzel Institute in NYC during the 1960s. I guess Patai was a Hebrew Scholar. His article mentions blood and other tests, and ends by saying Jewish is 1) Religion 2) Traditions 3) History 4) Country. But no one inherits Judaism through the genes anymore than Catholics or Buddhists are genealogically Christian or Buddhist because a relative once was.

There are many ideas in our society which are very old, but which lack actual or scientific roots. Children are asked to adopt them, and many such ideas become part of one's cherished beliefs. This is termed "Maya" by the Hindus, the unreal aspect of life, because perception is too shallow to penetrate to the truth. I have never been to a service in a Synagogue, had no Jewish culteral input as a child as my parents didn't follow it, have had a few Jewish boyfriends who didn't seem different from the rest of humanity, and all in all, though physical, genealogical relatives may have been members of a Jewish community and annihilated in the Holocaust, I still don't feel this is directly a part of Me. I believe staunchly in reincarnation--believe I am only occupying my body for a time and then will go on to an alternate world. Next time back, I may be born Chinese!

To sum it up, I am not against Judaism, but I am against the idea that there is any genealogical Judaism. Genealogy does not determine religious matters. Don't give me a label where it doesn't apply.

So, does this give you a clear answer? Kamitra1 (talk) 20:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stoneman: Please tell me about the correct way to communicate in the Wikipedia. Am I doing it the right way to put my words here, or should I be writing back to you from my own talk page, continuing under your reply? (I've just copy/pasted to your talk page.)

I love John Donne's famous "No Man Is An Island" message. With a few slight alterations of his 1500AD English terminology, here it is:

No man is an island entire unto himself. Every man is a part of the continent, a piece of the main. If a clod should fall off into the sea, this country is the less, as well as if a section of headlands had, as well as if a large house of your friend or family had. Any man's death diminishes me, for I am involved in mankind. Therefore, never send to ask for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee.

A few years ago I checked twelve Holocaust documentaries and films out of the library, and watched them all within two weeks. It was a powerful dose of education on the subject. My heart and the hearts of all decent people are shocked and saddened by that black event, and when I hear of the latest suicide attack in the Middle East, I feel the same way. Physical relatives or not makes no difference, for the whole of humanity is my relative. Our "circles" must someday become this large, to embrace the world.

Reincarnation is yin/yang on a wider scale than the day night cycle.

Thanks for unlinking me.

Kamitra1 (talk) 15:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamitra1 (talk • contribs)

November 2009[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Amanda de Cadenet, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. magnius (talk) 12:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is debatable whether or not only a single source is supplying information on the Amanda de Cadenet page. You need to specify exactly which source this is, to justify your position. The edits by Polly Phoenix obviously need close monitoring, is this what you are referring to? Also, removal of the link to the IMDb page for Amanda de Cadenet requires clarification from you. The IMDb link has nothing to do with whether or not the page is being supplied by only one source. Stonnman (talk) 22:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Why on earth do you insist on having the same information twice in the same article? Drmies (talk) 17:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Some members of wikipedia seem to think that ANY mention of an actor or actress portraying a member of the British royal family should immediately be expunged": there is no conspiracy; perhaps you are interested in reading WP:AGF. The simple matter is that a note about an actor should go in the actor's article. And once is enough. And reinstating it again and again is disruptive. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What I was trying to get across was the concept that "portrayals in the media" sections are very commonplace. For some reason, you seem to think that the only valid way to mention Rupert Friend's portrayal of Prince Albert is in a section called "Legacy". I will admit, however, that many prominent individuals who have wikipedia pages have a separate page regarding their cultural impact, maybe that is what is needed here.

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:43, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Curtiss SB2C Helldiver accidents and incidents[edit]

The section is devoted to significant hull losses and loss of life, which neither of the two events currently listed in the section "Accidents and incidents" actually portrays, so I am setting up the Survivors section to more clearly identify the airframes involved as "Survivors". As you can appreciate, there were literally hundreds, if not thousands of crashes that involved the Curtiss SB2C Helldiver, and it would be difficult to classify any of them as notable. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:05, 27 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on User talk:Srobak were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved by another user. In the future you can use the "New section" link in top right. For more details see talk page guidelines. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Nelson[edit]

I'm aware of that. However, Sean Connery is recognised as the first actor to play the canonical Bond. Barry Nelson's performance is not considered a part of Bond canon. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 22:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Cassidy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

/www.timesunion.com/local/article/Notable-names-in-DWI-arrest-4749409.php|publisher=TimesUnion.com (Hearst Communications Inc. |accessdate=August 22, 2013}}</ref> After performing poorly on a field
fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_ref=s%3DshowShareBarUI%3Ap%3Dfacebook-like#axzz2q8Rm0iZv]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Swamp Ghost[edit]

Since you're the primary contributor to this article, I just wanted to give you a heads up that I've written a Did you know that links to the Swamp Ghost in case you wanted to spend some extra time on it.--v/r - T P 02:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Stonnman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Stonnman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Stonnman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Fredhutchinson.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Fredhutchinson.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:William Gerberding.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:William Gerberding.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]