User talk:Str1977

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Busy desk.svg I am busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
For more urgent matters, please send me an e-mail.


Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

Notes:

  • The link to the POV-section template is {{POV-section}}.
  • {{subst:test3}} is preferred.
  • Errors that need correction should be treated like <strike>this</strike> or <s>this</s>.
  • Sortable
Nick Name
Nick1 Name2
Nick2 Name1

Archives[edit]

Talk Page Archives
Vista-file-manager.png
FK A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


Forget about this old stuff. You have new messages that are no longer displayed in a format that elevates your blood pressure

New Messages[edit]

Re: MatthewTardiff[edit]

This may help you out with understanding them. (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride 16:56, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Also, something you might be interested in regarding MatthewTardiff, this SPI, the WrestlingInsider account was blocked for being a sock of his. If you see in the SPI, that he personally attacked me, so that's nothing new to him. Just wanted to give you a heads up of the type of editor you're dealing with, with him. (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride 21:43, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Charlotte (wrestler) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. LM2000 (talk) 20:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

LM2000, strange that among all that went back and forth on this, only I get this warning. Str1977 (talk) 20:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Str1977. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Carl Jung or Carl Gustav Jung[edit]

Since you initiated, ten years ago, the proposal at Talk:Carl Jung/Archive 2#Requested move, the discussion currently active at Talk:Carl Jung#Requested move 14 November 2016 may be of interest. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 20:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

February 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Rumble (2017). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vjmlhds 18:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Dear User:Vjmlhds,
I think your comment here as well your reverting entirely uncalled for. I was not editing disruptively at all but restoring a version that actually conformed to the sources (see http://www.wwe.com/superstars/goldberg). I did so after contributing to the talk page. At worst, my edits are controversial. I have not in the past engaged in any edit warring on this so I can't see what was disruptive about my edits. I think it quite uncivil of you to immediately issue threats of the the more extreme sort, especially since you are actually party to the dispute, and then not even have the courtesy to sign your comment. Str1977 (talk) 20:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dune (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magic Carpet Ride (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

The Gold Experience[edit]

Earlier this month you removed "Pussy Control", saying if "P Control" is its official title, that is what we should include. However, just earlier, you removed "P Control" and retained "Pussy Control". In the interim time, I provided a ref to the promo single of "319/Pussy Control" as proof that the title of "Pussy Control" was censored for the album release, and is known by two titles (but is the same song). The page has included both for quite a while, and maintaining them was a stable version. If you disagree, can you please take it to the talk page (per WP:BRD) instead of this delayed back-and-forth revert-type thing? Thanks. Perhaps a solution is noting elsewhere on the page that the title was censored. However, because the album does not have extensive prose, this is why it is noted next to the title. Ss112 09:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss on the talk page and stop removing it per WP:BRD. The first ref proving the title is "Pussy Control" would be meaningless otherwise. I think there may be a case for both sides of this (that the title of the song was first released with the full title; it is at least noteworthy enough to include); however, no consensus can be reached by continually reverting whether formally or informally. Ss112 09:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Twin Peaks (2017 TV series) edit[edit]

Hi, this edit of yours appears to have broken the Supernatural section's notes. —Bruce1eetalk 14:54, 7 September 2017 (UTC)