"Wikipedia's articles are no place for strong views. Or rather, we feel about strong views the way that a natural history museum feels about tigers. We admire them and want our visitors to see how fierce and clever they are, so we stuff them and mount them for close inspection. We put up all sorts of carefully worded signs to get people to appreciate them as much as we do. But however much we adore tigers, a live tiger loose in the museum is seen as an urgent problem." --WP:TIGER
- 1 Melbourne, FL
- 2 The Georgia Page
- 3 Dated cleanup tags
- 4 Catholic Churches
- 5 Brandywine
- 6 Charles Adams
- 7 Smyrna and Bodrum
- 8 Florida template
- 9 Speedy Deletion notice on Northeast Kingdom Community Action
- 10 Causes of the us housing bubble
- 11 Causes of the us housing bubble
- 12 Talkback
- 13 Talkback
- 14 message
- 15 Vandalism of articles
- 16 Talkback
- 17 Notables
- 18 Whisperback
- 19 The School System
- 20 Pavlovsk
- 21 Richard Hatch
- 22 WikiProject Christianity Newsletter (June 2013)
- 23 Talkback
- 24 Biomass
- 25 Port Canaveral
- 26 Up to my ass in alligators?
- 27 TheFamousPeople.com as a source
- 28 Long due apology
I put the section back in, mainly because although a bit gaudy it was all true, and all seemed to be valid articles.
Perhaps get rid of the arrows, move to the back?
The Georgia Page
Actually, now that I think about it, I went to the Georgia page and went through the links of the major cities. When I went to each cities page I checked out there metro status and Macon came in third behind Atlanta and Augusta.
You offered some comments last week about a proposed deletion of Incarnation Catholic Church and School (Glendale, California). You correctly noted that the article was rough, as it had just been started. I have been preparing articles on some of the significant parishes in Los Angeles and wondered if you'd have a few minutes to take a look and make suggestions on format, content, info boxes, etc. One of your notes indicated that the number of members was key data, and I agree, but do you know of any verifiable source to determine membership for Catholic parishes? Examples of the parishes I have so far created articles for are: St. Andrew's Catholic Church, Pasadena, St. Robert Bellarmine Catholic Church, St. Charles Borromeo Church (North Hollywood), and St. Finbar Catholic Church and School (Burbank, California).
Brandywine is a general disambiguation page (which Brandywine Creek and Brandywine River) point to.
I went through all the Brandywine references and updated them to point to the appropriate articles. There were and are many pages referring to either "Brandywine Creek" or "Brandywine River" and not necessarily pointing to the correct one.
"Brandywine River" can refer to: "Brandywine Creek (Christina River)" or "Brandywine Creek (Cuyahoga River)". or the fictional (Hobbit/Rings Trilogy) Middle Earth river.
"Brandywine Creek" refers to at least 25 different ones in the U.S.
(5) Brandywine in British Columbia, (2) Brandywine in Nova Scotia, and more outside of North America ...
Rivers are officially disambiguated by their downstream_parent, for instance Brandywine (Christina River), only when that fails, then a reasonable civil sub-division. See WikiProject Rivers for more details.
If you undo my updates, you are on your own...
I am not particularly familiar with Vermont but I try to edit pages with correct links, sources, etc. Adams' page says the town so it has been fixed to that. Any correction to my corrections can be made. Thanks for the thanks!
Speedy Deletion notice on Northeast Kingdom Community Action
Causes of the us housing bubble
Thank you for your recommendation. I will work on it this weekend.
Causes of the us housing bubble
Thank you for your recommendation. I will work on it this weekend. Sguffanti
Vandalism of articles
Please make a point of editing articles only when you are knowledgeable of the subject matter and exercise restraint in deleting relevant and valuable substantive content that has been contributed to articles by other editors who have donated their time and expertise to the expansion of knowledge through Wikipedia.
- (from a newbie who never, ever, signs his posts! And who overwhelmed an article with a gallery of pictures despite having been told by two editors about WP:NOTIMAGE. Ah, well. )
The School System
I actually attend one of the middle schools, so that is why. User:Atum World/Toast
One of the purposes of the set index articles on Russian inhabited localities is to list the entities for which an article is not yet created but should be. Having those links makes the sets complete, generates the backlinks which help prioritize the articles to be created, points out to the correct title under which the article needs to be created, and, by aggregating all links in one place, prevents the proliferation of countless useless stubs which are basically one line repeating the description in the set index. Furthermore, there is nothing confusing about a red link. Please continue on that set's talk page if you still disagree. The only real problem with that page is that it is currently unreferenced; I will have that fixed.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 6, 2012; 14:22 (UTC)
Have you seen the page on Richard Hatch, especially the POV section on Tax Evasion written by his lawyers? Very interesting! Richard_Hatch_(Survivor_contestant)
WikiProject Christianity Newsletter (June 2013)
From the Editor
Starting this month we will start a "Focus on" series, where we will try to "bring Jesus back" and focus on him. For five consecutive issues we will focus on one aspect of the study of Jesus. The goal of this series is to inform our members of what the project contains and highlight those articles which have reached quality and stability.
From this month until November we will focus on the historical Jesus, a topic which has been the subject of much discussion on article talk pages, as well as the general media. This is an important topic, and we have a good set of well referenced articles on that now. Then, starting in December we will focus on Christ, and the spiritual and theological elements that the title entails. Following that the review of the life and ministry of Jesus in the New Testament, his miracles, and parables will take place. And each month the "Bookshelf" will mention a book that fits the theme of the month.
We hope you will enjoy this journey as we present a new aspect of Jesus each month. And given that as the number of project pages increases, the ratio of those watching the pages declines, we hope that more of you will watch some of these central pages that help define this project.
Church of the month
The current building of All Saints' Church, Winthorpe in Nottinghamshire, England which was completed in 1888, is at least the third version of the church, which dates back to at least the early 13th century.
Good articles and DYKs
The article Jesus received the good article mark last month, as did Cleeve Abbey. A number of churches were featured on the main page in the DYK section in May, namely St. Lamberti, Hildesheim, Karja church, Braaby Church, St Patrick's Liverpool, Vlah Church, Freerslev Church, Cathedral of Our Lady of the Assumption, Mata-Utu, St. Michael's Cathedral (Sitka, Alaska), St. Lamberti, Hildesheim, Karja church, Braaby Church, St. Pierre Cathedral, Saint-Pierre, Mont Saint Michel Abbey, St Patrick's Church, Liverpool, Vlah Church, St Catherine of Siena Church, Cocking, Catedral Nuestra Señora de La Asunción, Roholte Church, Notre Dame Cathedral, Taiohae, Leicester Abbey, Caracas Cathedral, Caldey Abbey, King's Mead Priory, Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Hong Kong) andAll Saints' Church, Winthorpe, as well as the hymn What Wondrous Love Is This.
Did Jesus exist? Did he walk the streets of Jerusalem? The Historicity of Jesus article answers these questions with a firm affirmative. Historicity does not discuss if Jesus walked on water, but if he walked at all. The issue was the subject of scholarly debate before the end of last century, but the academic debate is almost over now. As the article discusses, virtually all academic opposition to the existence of Jesus has evaporated away now and scholars see it as a concluded issue. The discussion is now just among mostly self-published non-academics.
The article discusses the ancient sources that relate to Jesus and how they fit together to establish that he existed. The evidence for Jesus is not just based on the Christian gospels, but by inter-relating them with non-Christian sources, and the fact that they all "fit together". Moreover, the existence of Jesus is not supported just by Christian scholars and in recent years the detailed knowledge of Jewish scholars and their discoveries (e.g. Shlomo Pines' discovery of the Syriac Josephus) has proven highly beneficial. We encourage you to read and follow the article, for the existence of Jesus is central to the existence of Christianity.
From the bookshelf
Just a few years after its publication, Van Voorst's book has become the standard comprehensive text for the discussion of ancient sources that relate to Jesus and his historicity. This detailed yet really readable book has received wide ranging endorsements - Blomberg and Harris separately referring to it as the most comprehensive treatment of the subject.
Did you know...
Please let us know if there are any particular areas, either individual articles or topics, which you believe would benefit from outside help from other editors. We will try to include such requests in future issues.
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe remove yourself from the listhere
I'm not sure I understand your edit to Port Canaveral. You wrote: "About 60% of revenue comes from cruise lines. Cruise-related parking is 18%. Petroleum constitutes 43% of cargo." Did you mean to say petroleum constitutes 43% of revenue? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:34, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- You're right. This is too terse. I was trying to say that out of the about 22% for cargo, petroleum+ is 43% of that remainder. The sentence needs rewriting. Thanks for noticing. On mobile now. If I don't get back to it in some reasonable time, feel free to correct it yourself. Student7 (talk) 02:03, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Up to my ass in alligators?
- Clearly, you are correct when you ask for a citation. And, yes, my remarks are seat-of-pants variety. Just a WAG. My remarks were from 5 years ago, and, other reading material that sounds like me, I am a bit lost in restarting. You'd think the Wildlife conservation people would have some kind of algorithm that is newer than 1980 or so. Student7 (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
TheFamousPeople.com as a source
Hi Student7. I've been looking over the use of thefamouspeople.com as a source or link in Wikipedia. There have been concerns of it being spammed, and doesn't appear to be a reliable source per Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2017_May_29#The_Famous_People:_Reliable.3F. I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to let you know why I removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 15:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Long due apology
Maybe you dont remember me, we had an interaction at Talk:John F. Kennedy#Rosemary. I was sort of rude towards you in that conversation. Even though at that time, I apologised there; I still feel bad about the ordeal. I have been meaning to do this since a long time, but at first I couldnt find the thread (I kept searching for it on the talkpages of articles other than JFK, including Rosemary, her mother, and so on). I accidentally found the thread a few days ago when I was skimming through JFK's talkpage.
Kindly forgive me if possible for my rudeness in that discussion. It would mean a lot to me. Regards, —usernamekiran(talk) 07:08, 14 October 2017 (UTC)