User talk:Sturmgewehr88

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
AbiWord.svg
Qxz-ad18.gif
Please Sign Your Posts
Finland road sign 142.svg This user is currently working on
WP:WikiProject Ryūkyū.
StG88's Wikistress level: Having a life.

Please comment on Talk:Douglas MacArthur[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Douglas MacArthur. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Help needed re Battle of Ia Drang[edit]

Hi, I need a favor from you pertaining the editing of Battle of Iadrang. You might be still aware of the edit warring between User:Dino nam and me, specifically his persistent abusive OR tagging. He recently re-added the bogus tags without consensus [1] as soon as his 48 hour blocking expired. I have been advised not do any reverting as not re-start an editing war. Would you please, as a neutral party, remove the tags in my stead as to restore the version prior to the editing war? Thank you.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 13:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

@Tnguyen4321: I can't be your proxy, but I will look at the situation and do what I think needs to be done. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 18:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
@Sturmgewehr88: Sorry but I don't agree with your latest editing, sir. The WP:NOR regulation have clearly stated: "Drawing conclusions not evident in the reference is original research regardless of the type of source." Therefore, tagging a material is probably still appropriate even when that material is cited from a source. In fact, the content in the article is out of context: it's the result of derivations by user:Tnguyen4321 himself, not something evidently showed in the source. It can't either be WP:BLUE, as they're complex military concepts and analysis, not a common sense.
p/s: For clarification of identification, I'm user:Dino nam. 117.6.88.137 (talk) 03:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
@Dino nam: Three things: first, you don't have to use the {{re}} template on another user's talk page, as they're automatically notified already. Two, Tnguyen4321 has provided sources that state South Vietnam's involvement in the campaign; I have added a dispute tag which is much more appropriate. Finally (and most importantly), you should have logged in and responded to my message on your talk page (you're allowed to do that), and logging out and coming here or anywhere as an IP is block evasion. I will try to help you and @Tnguyen4321: sort out the problems with the article, but you both must follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines both in spirit and letter. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 04:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your fair intervention. Tnguyen4321 (talk) 14:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

I've just made some recent editing on Battle of Ia Drang. Please see if the info I've put into the box is OK. I'm afraid that Tnguyen4321 is going to engage in edit warring again, and it's useless to discuss with such a stubborn person on the talk page. Thanks. Dino nam (talk) 21:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Removing RfC re Battle of Ia Drang[edit]

I think you were too hasty in closing the RfC after just a few comments. You should allow more times for other comments that really shows a balance judgment. But well, I don't want be accused of giving the appearance of wanting to beating a horse's carcass, by having a different sentence that is not "synthesis, pointless, and not neutral". Thanks for your "not so fair" intervention anyway. Tnguyen4321 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

@Tnguyen4321: Do you really think the result would have been different had I waited 30 days? Out of the four uninvolved comments, one only mentioned that there was poor grammar, and the other three all said that the sentence went against WP:SYNTH, WP:RELEVANCE, and WP:N. I'm completely sure that had I left the RfC open, there would just be more comments saying the same thing. I am in fact trying to be fair. I do not approve of the vandalism/edit warring and sockpuppetry of Dino nam, but I equally do not approve the synthesis and misinterpreting of sources that you have done. You have done a good job building up the article, but you still have to follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 18:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
It might or not make any difference, but the silence majority usually takes time to react, especially in the case of SYNTH, OR which are pretty complex notions to understand fully and easily interpreted as one sees fit. But anyway I have moved on beyond disputable notions by providing reliable and verifiable sources. I am abiding to Wikipedia policy, am I not? Tnguyen4321 (talk) 18:49, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

RfC on "Battle of Ia Drang"[edit]

Mr Tiderolls keep saying that there's something wrong with the format of my RfC. I really don't understand. Do you see any problem? Dino nam (talk) 17:19, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Pleiku campaign[edit]

Glad that this newly created article caught your attention. Tnguyen4321 (talk) 13:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

@Tnguyen4321: I actually noticed it about a month or so ago, I'm surprised that I hadn't already created the talk page for it. It seems very short though, you should definitely expand it. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 05:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Avedis Zildjian Company[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Avedis Zildjian Company. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Order of the Netherlands Lion[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Order of the Netherlands Lion. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Singapore[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:McCarthyism[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:McCarthyism. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Help on Battle of Ia Drang[edit]

Tnguyen4321 has put some synthesis and OR again in the section Battle of Ia Drang#General Westmoreland's crucial role. I think I need your help to resolve this. Dino nam (talk) 02:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC) A bot has just removed the RfC tag. Should we close the RfC based on the opinions of majority? Thanks. Dino nam (talk) 08:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hindupur[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hindupur. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)