User talk:Summonmaster13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

H==Dave Morey== I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Dave Morey, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Dave Morey. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. EMT1871 01:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]




ello, Summonmaster13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  AmiDaniel (Talk) 23:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

School article style[edit]

Wikipedia has a standard style for school articles. Take a look at Liberty High School (Brentwood, California) for a good example. There should always be an "Secondary school" infobox like the one for Liberty High. Pictures are optional, but desirable. When you just create stubs, someone has to clean up after you. Thanks. --John Nagle 04:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese names[edit]

Hi and welcome to WP. According to the WP:MOS-JA, modern Japanese names should use the Western order. So, for example, Udaka Shinji should be Shinji Udaka. If you don't mind, I'll move the article. Thanks. –Dicty (T/C) 00:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Female Basketball players[edit]

Sorry I forgot to come an tell you about them. I found them all with speedy tags on them. I delted two but then had second thoughts. So I restored the two and removed the tags and put the prod one one. You should read Wikipedia:Proposed deletion to see what to do next. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am a big fan of sports, and especially like basketball, and American football. Since I like the sport so much, I wanted to increase its publicity, by adding articles, that I thought were interesting. I believed that they were notable, and I wouldn't intentionally create articles that were not notable. I am trying to improve Wikipedia instead of degrade it.--Summonmaster13 18:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I was sure that they were not speedy. Under the rules of Wikipedia:Proposed deletion you can remove the prod at anytime. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:25, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marking school stubs[edit]

I see you are creating a lot of stubs for high schools in Florida. Please include the code {{Florida-school-stub}} at the bottom of the school stubs you create. -- Donald Albury(Talk) 15:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Avoild bulk creation of stubs[edit]

Please stop creating very short school articles, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools#General tips, Avoid bulk additions. The bulk automated entry of schools is strongly discouraged, as is the bulk adding of schools to the Articles for deletion page. As a general rule of thumb, only add schools that you are willing to do significant research on.

Please also see the project page for guidelines on what a school article should contain. Sub-stubs such as many of your creations are often nominated for deletion, and I would support deletion for many of your articles if they were nominated. -- Donald Albury(Talk) 16:27, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that.--Summonmaster13 17:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of 500 point seasons[edit]

Please don't add copyrighted text to Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, List of 500 point seasons, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! Peripitus (Talk) 03:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Your hard work is appreciated but I had to submit the article Florida State vs Michigan (1991) for speedy delete (which has now been actioned by an independent admin) because the content was essentially the same as that on a web site. Copyright is a problem that we all have difficulties with from time to time but the key test is whether the essentials of the article is the same as the source - editing and reordering do solve any copyright issues. You might find some of the discussions at Wikipedia:Copyright issues helpful. BlueValour 23:19, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, I didn't copy it word for word. I had to change a lot of words, and even sentence structure.--Summonmaster13 23:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

College Football Project[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you have edited a College football related article. You may be interested to know that there is a college football WikiProject which you can join if you like. We would love to have you! --Mecu 02:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Yes, I will consider joining. I am a big college football fan--Summonmaster13 02:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the UT AdditionsCJC47 17:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voting twice on the same AfD[edit]

such as the votes you cast here and here is highly frowned upon. Please don't do it again; such activity can result in your being blocked. --EngineerScotty 21:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted material[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the 2003 Fiesta Bowl article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Dpbsmith (talk) 23:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 2003 Fiesta Bowl, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://ohiostatebuckeyes.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/010303aaa.html. As a copyright violation, 2003 Fiesta Bowl appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. 2003 Fiesta Bowl has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:2003 Fiesta Bowl. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at 2003 Fiesta Bowl, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --Bigtop (tk||cb|Special:Emailuser/Bigtop|em]]|ea) 00:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the text you copied from [1] from the Oak Hill article. Metros232 20:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the notice removed from this page? --Talamor 21:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

William Watson (basketball player)[edit]

In view of your interest in school and college sports you may wish to take a look at William Watson (basketball player). This was created by a new user on top of an important DAB page so I have moved it to this new title. I have put it in a suitable cat, stubbed and tagged it but will not be editing it further. BlueValour 23:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

C.V. Money[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks on other people as you did at C.V. Money. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create such pages will blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Thank you. --Midnightcomm 05:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

College football season articles[edit]

I noticed you have been creating several college football season articles. You may want to consult Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Yearly team pages format to see the format that has been accepted by the college football wikiproject. (there are currently some proposed changes on the talk page you may want to add your input to as well). Thanks, VegaDark 23:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Mario Urrutia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Mario Urrutia. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Joe 05:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsa Basketball Coaches box[edit]

You linked to a general John Phillips. This link should be used for the coach: John Phillips (basketball coach)

Josh Heytvelt on DYK for 9 March 2007[edit]

Updated DYK query On 9 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Josh Heytvelt, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

ERcheck (talk) 02:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

I noticed you haven't gotten an official welcome notice, so here it is...

Hello Summonmaster13! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! WinBot 04:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 22:02, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Mike Knoll

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Mike Knoll. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. ArglebargleIV 01:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

College Baseball Project[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you have edited a College baseball related article. You may be interested to know that there is a college baseball WikiProject which you can join if you like. We would love to have you!

Council Grove High School[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Council Grove High School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. 172.168.226.72 22:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Orleans Bowl[edit]

Nice work building pages for the New Orleans Bowl. In the future, can you add the college football banner to the talk pages of those articles? That indexes the page as part of the College Football Wikiproject and helps people find the articles a bit more easily. Thanks! JKBrooks85 (talk) 19:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invite[edit]

Century Tower
Century Tower

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Alicia Ratay, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Issue with category in CFB articles[edit]

Just an FYI, I've noticed a small issue with the a category in some of the articles you have created. It is Division I-A, not Division 1-A. And, after 2005, its Division I FBS, not Division 1 FBS.↔NMajdantalk 15:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sunny Golloway[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sunny Golloway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Goochelaar (talk) 22:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sunny Golloway[edit]

I have nominated Sunny Golloway, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunny Golloway. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Goochelaar (talk) 17:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:VolunteersRetired[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:VolunteersRetired requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:OhioStateQuarterback requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:BuffaloeQuarterback requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

I'm not sure if you're still contributing on a regular basis, but I wanted to thank you for creating so many really wonderful college football bowl game navigational boxes. I was wondering if you'd be willing to do a few more—if you've got the time, of course. I've recently begun working on building up coverage of Virginia Tech bowl games, and I was noticing how handy those navboxes were. If you're still around and interested, let me know. I'm not that good with template syntax, which is why I'm asking for help. Any you could provide would be greatly appreciated. JKBrooks85 (talk) 10:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:AUTigersQuarterback requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Linda Burdette[edit]

I have nominated Linda Burdette, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Burdette. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Paste (talk) 16:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rick Moody (coach)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Rick Moody (coach) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 02:53, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vanderbilt category[edit]

I recategorized the four articles that you put in Category:Presidents of Vanderbilt University to Category:Chancellors of Vanderbilt University. Vanderbilt's chief executive is known as the chancellor. Vanderbilt's only ever had one president, the late Emmett Fields, who served as president in the 1970s under Chancellor Heard. Cheers! Esrever (klaT) 00:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Request for J. Kelly Hall[edit]

Notability of J. Kelly Hall[edit]

A tag has been placed on J. Kelly Hall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. otherlleft (talk) 18:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Demario Eddins[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Demario Eddins, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No establishment of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wizardman 16:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Memphis Tigers athletic directors, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Memphis Tigers athletic directors has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Memphis Tigers athletic directors, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:EAGL coaches[edit]

Template:EAGL coaches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. fuzzy510 (talk) 12:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Craig Blazer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 01:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1981 Holiday Bowl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. iBendiscuss 05:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tim McCalister has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Basketball player who never played professionally; currently non notable and fails WP:RS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:18, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Summonmaster13! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 30 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,097 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Craig Blazer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Ty Tucker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Jake Boss - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Tom Harp - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Gordon Chiesa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Mack Saxon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Eddie Fogler - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Jack Murdock - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Carl Tacy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Bob Zuffelato - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:08, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Fred Priddle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shashwat986 (talk) 18:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chuck Clegg has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ηyχαμς 21:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on George Logan (soccer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ηyχαμς 21:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Chuck Clegg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ηyχαμς 21:17, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits[edit]

Hello. You have recently created new articles which do not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for multiple reasons, the most obvious of which is that they are unreferenced. It is very important to cite sources when writing new articles, especially when writing a biography. It is also imporant to provide multiple sources to make sure Wikipedia's Neutrality policy isn't violated.

For more info refer to the Welcome notice at the top of this page or visit Template:Welcome. Happy editing - ηyχαμς 21:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from George Logan (soccer), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ηyχαμς 21:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mike Avery (soccer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 23:01, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mike Avery (soccer). Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. andy (talk) 08:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Mike Avery (soccer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Avery (soccer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andy (talk) 13:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NCAA Soccer coaches[edit]

A few people seem to have a vendetta against your work on the NCAA soccer scene.. according to User:Hack they meet the wikipedia criteria for inclusion. so all is good. TheBigJagielka (talk) 03:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In your article regarding Eric Nichols, there is missing information in the infobox. Please fix this, and if you don't have the information, either delete the field or delete the article.


Thanks!

Ddbruce (talk) 13:18, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Margo Plotzke has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 13:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article NCAA Division I-A football team records by decade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:IINFO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:55, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ty Tucker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A state university tennis coach. Clearly fails the notability guidelines used by Wikiproject Tennis, see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tennis/Article_guidelines#Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1993 Fiesta Bowl for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1993 Fiesta Bowl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1993 Fiesta Bowl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking (edits) 04:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Baylor Bears athletic directors[edit]

Category:Baylor Bears athletic directors and similar categories, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:47, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lisa Griffith has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dismas|(talk) 02:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ralph Lundy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hasn't played or coached for a fully pro club which means he fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Plus he fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mikemor92 (talk) 18:28, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ralph Polson (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has neither played or managed a fully pro club which means he fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Plus he has not recieved any significant coverage so he fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mikemor92 (talk) 18:32, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Most weeks ranked number 1 (NCAA football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most weeks ranked number 1 (NCAA football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GrapedApe (talk) 23:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ian McIntyre (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 21:09, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karen Langeland[edit]

The article Karen Langeland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN person fails GNG (2 primary sources), no notability asserted

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 17:16, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bryan Davis (soccer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryan Davis (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Davis (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Big West Conference men's soccer coach navbox[edit]

Template:Big West Conference men's soccer coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Corkythehornetfan 05:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Southern Conference men's soccer coach navbox[edit]

Template:Southern Conference men's soccer coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Corkythehornetfan 05:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Providence Friars men's soccer coach navbox[edit]

Template:Providence Friars men's soccer coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob13Talk 03:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:South Florida Bulls men's soccer coach navbox[edit]

Template:South Florida Bulls men's soccer coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob13Talk 03:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tulsa Golden Hurricane men's soccer coach navbox[edit]

Template:Tulsa Golden Hurricane men's soccer coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob13Talk 03:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Villanova Wildcats men's soccer coach navbox[edit]

Template:Villanova Wildcats men's soccer coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob13Talk 03:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wake Forest Demon Deacons men's soccer coach navbox[edit]

Template:Wake Forest Demon Deacons men's soccer coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob13Talk 03:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Colliflower[edit]

The article George Colliflower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Horizon League men's soccer coach navbox[edit]

Template:Horizon League men's soccer coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 09:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Boston College Eagles women's basketball coach navbox[edit]

Template:Boston College Eagles women's basketball coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 16:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this discussion. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:53, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dana Taylor (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a college and semi-pro soccer coach which doesn't satisfy WP:FOOTBALL or WP:GNG. All online coverage is trivial in nature except a single interview published by the Modesto Bee.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 15:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Tom Amstutz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 18:21, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Mike Knoll has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 01:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Melody Johnson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melody Johnson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melody Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:59, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kris Clack for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kris Clack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Clack (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 22:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Eric Luzzi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 17:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of 500 point seasons in college football is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 500 point seasons in college football until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Clyde B. Smith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Was a headcoach, but nothing exceptional per WP:NCOLLATH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – S. Rich (talk) 00:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Conference USA men's soccer coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:09, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Don Lawrence (American football) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mid-American Conference men's soccer coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Gary Ward (baseball coach) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Richard Williams (basketball coach) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Tasha McDowell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Exclusively relies on the subject's profile in university as source. Searches only find trivial mentions or announcement of appointment (WP:ROUTINE). Lacks sufficient significant coverage to pass WP:NBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 21:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bret Simon for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bret Simon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bret Simon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 19:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]