Hi! I noticed you made some improvements to Whaling. The article is a bit of a mess, and really needs more TLC. You removed the most biased section of an anonymous user's addition, but left the rest of it and simply tagged it as problematic. In the future, go ahead and remove all of edits like that, that are obviously not integrated into the text and are lacking in sources. I hope you keep editing that article; it needs a lot of work! Enuja 21:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey there Supasheep, hope all is well round your neck-of-the-woods. I have finally got going on the static electricity article you suggested; it is currently on my user subpage as I like to get things fairly coherent before foisting them on an unsuspecting public. I would welcome you comments/suggestions/contributions, feel free to edit my user subpage if you wish. I will be moving everything across to the main article space shortly.
- Hi, i'm not sure if you are aware that the Static electricity article has been up for a while and is progressing nicely. I like the changes you have made and will implement them in the article soon if you do not do so first. I am also copying your suggestions regarding flour milling and gunpowder to the article talk page to hopefully inspire anyone with particular knowledge of these areas to contribute. You might also note the debate regarding the caption for the first image; if you have any thoughts then feel free to make them known. --DJIndica (talk) 05:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Recently you put a tag on Tang Dynasty concerning its infobox. Can you explain exactly what is wrong with the infobox? I'd like to fix the problem(s), but I just don't see what that could possibly be.--Pericles of AthensTalk 07:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi SupaSheep. Just wanted to send my greetings and hope that all is well in your neck of the woods. -Qualidit 21:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Re: Edits to "Wikipedia" Article
Arrrgh. >_< Please stop trying not to offend me via "I" statements, which ironically make me feel condescended to because they falsely imply that I cannot handle disagreement: I am not a narcissist!
With my annoyance off my chest and the politeness burden hopefully off your shoulders, let us refine the page! :)
-How do my edits "subtly change the meaning or emphasis of the phrases in question"? -Why is "some of the resulting text difficult to parse"? -Thanks. I admire your Curriculum Vitae. -Derp. Derp. Derp! You, like many earlier others, are right: I should break-up my edits.
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
You forgot to fix the link at Advanced gas-cooled reactor to Watt#Electrical and thermal watts. Do you want me to fix this or are you still working on it? Kendall-K1 (talk) 01:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for noting the issue---I've repaired the link on the AGR page. Supasheep (talk) 23:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- That link actually doesn't belong there because it's already linked in the first paragraph. It's the first link I was asking about. I have fixed it here, here, and here. Kendall-K1 (talk) 02:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks again. Supasheep (talk) 13:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)