User talk:SuperMarioMan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Undelete Andgopink[edit]

Hello Nice to meet you, SuperMarioMan, would you be kind to restore the page of an artist Andgopink, or give any following explantion for your deleting. So after restoring i would edit an add details that you will mention. (Vino774) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vino774 (talkcontribs) 16:54, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


Shailendramithila (talk) 07:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)MithilalokShailendramithila (talk) 07:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC) Hi, You recently deleted our company's wiki page and looking to see if you can provide a reason for your actions. The page was

Your company is less than three months old. As it does not appear to satisfy any of the notability criteria at WP:NCOMPANY, it does not merit an article here. If someone must create an article on it, it should not be you – see WP:Conflict of interest. SuperMarioMan ( Talk ) 15:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Why did you delete?[edit]

Why did you delete this?

The reason shown was no importance of the subject.

This person is a author and students gets projects to write about him. thats why the page was started.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sajeevattingal (talkcontribs) 08:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Rinku das.Jr[edit]

Hello. From the public logs of this page, I see that you have deleted the page per G5. Om says has created the page again. Since you tagged it for G5, is it possible that Om says is a sock? Please have a look. Thanks.  LeoFrank  Talk 17:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


Hi, You recently deleted our company's wiki page and looking to see if you can provide a reason for your actions. The page was titled Octane.In.

It only mentioned facts and nothing in praise of the company, then how can the page be deleted for reason like unambiguous advertising. Any suggestions from your end would be accepted happily. But atlas give an accurate reason as to why my article is being deleted again and again

And i have seen similar type of articles still surviving on wikipedia. Referring to- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grumpy22 (talkcontribs)

  • Grumpy22 (talk · contribs) Firstly, the article Octane.In was deleted for lack of credible indication of significance, not advertising or promotion (although reading the deleted page, I would consider it promotional).

    Secondly, the poor quality of one article cannot be used to justify that of another. We are here to improve this encyclopaedia's overall quality, not drag it down; see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.

    Thirdly and finally, you should not write an article about your own company, as it creates a conflict of interest that makes neutral, encyclopaedic editing difficult. If your company satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines, someone who is unaffiliated with you will, in time, produce a suitable article. SuperMarioMan ( Talk ) 15:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


You deleted my fave DJ's page Anna Lunoe. Please undelete thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janexx123 (talkcontribs) 14:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

I see you are listed as an administration official willing to undelete articles. I looked for the deletion administrator but he has moved as of 23 March 2016 and is no longer available according to his page.

I see this today. 03:46, 26 February 2011 Explicit (talk | contribs) deleted page Masseuse 2 (Expired PROD, concern was: Fails WP:NFILM, no assertion or evidence of notability, no significant reliable sourcing. Claimed awards are unreferenced and unidentified, and not won by the film itself.)

Would you please restore this article in my sandbox so that I can evaluate and write it. I think the comments are not correct but there could be movie title confusion. If there are several versions, could you copy the original version, the longest version, and the list of editors?

Thank you. April001 (talk) 06:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

  • @April001: Welcome to Wikipedia. I've set up a draft version in your userspace at User:April001/Masseuse 2. To be accepted in the main article space, the page will need to include references to secondary sources demonstrating how the film is notable according to Wikipedia standards. You may want to have a look at the notability guideline WP:Notability (films) and the help page Help:Referencing for beginners. The restored page consists mostly of plot summary with little information on critical response to the film. SuperMarioMan ( Talk ) 22:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. I see that this is a different film than I was looking for. I was looking for a mainstream film. However, don't delete the draft version on my userspace because a search has found that this film was nominated for several awards and won some. Maybe I will work on it some other time. Thanks for your help. April001 (talk) 05:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

regarding deletion of and my email to you[edit]

Sir What is the normal response time to expect from you of the email I sent you regarding deletion of If a post here will be bring me a faster reply, please let me know. If I don't get a response in another 48 hours I will take care to post my email here.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mthakurr (talkcontribs)


I don't think that was within A7's scope. It appears to be a map in a computer game/software. Adam9007 (talk) 13:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

@Adam9007: It is a plot element in Zwift, described in its own deleted article as an "online indoor cycling game"; i.e. a form of web content. SuperMarioMan ( Talk ) 13:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
@SuperMarioMan: Just because it's online doesn't mean it's web content. If you go to the Zwift website, there's a link to download it. It runs over the internet, not the world wide web (I know the difference). Adam9007 (talk) 13:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
@Adam9007: As do I, but Wikipedia:Notability (web) doesn't seem to distinguish between the two terms. As the game is a download, I think that there is a strong argument for classing it as "web content" under the guideline. I've restored the article, however, not just because of your concerns but also because Google News, as it turns out, has several entries on the game and this particular element, none of which were referenced in the deleted articles: [1]. It would be better if there were a neutrally-written article on Zwift to go with it, but the Watopia article could definitely be expanded. SuperMarioMan ( Talk ) 23:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
@SuperMarioMan: Funny you should mention that guideline, because I think I may have discovered a loophole (which includes that argument) which classes certain software as web content. Software is supposed to be excluded from A7, but according to the guideline, if it's available solely or primarily on the web (i.e if it's only available via download), then it's classed as web content rather than software, even if it has nothing to do with the world wide web. I've launched an RfC on the issue:


Adam9007 (talk) 00:49, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Leona Brady Watson[edit]

My name is Gail Chiang and I sent your an email and I asked why you deleted an article about my Mother Leona Brady Watson. You sighted copyright infringement which has no relevance to information that belongs to my Mother. My Father Curneall Watson and I was and still is the Legal Gardian of my Mother and everything related to her. You sighted a blog on talk live radio that did a speak about my Mother and used information that I wrote and information of awards she received in US Congress. I would like you to rethink your action and look into the legal rights of My Mother which we have. I have sent the Legal Guardianship to Wikipedia and now that my Mother has passed and will be receiving posthumous award from The US VI Governor, I want her legacy to live on. Buy the way. There is an article called Cariso that is incorrect as it is based in Trinidad. I am perplexed that Wikipedia has investigated the accuracy of the article. My email is <removed> see reference: Tribute to Our Native Songbird, Ms Leona Brady Watson, the ... BlogTalkRadio - ‎Chatting with Dr Richardson Mar 7, 2015 Kind Regards, Gail Chiang — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leona Brady Watson (talkcontribs)

@Leona Brady Watson: Wikipedia users are expected to write articles in their own words, not simply copy material from other websites. As the text of your article was taken word-for-word from a copyrighted website, I do not see how it could be regarded as anything other than a copyright violation. You are welcome to email the Wikimedia Foundation with whatever legal documentation you may have but this will not override any of Wikipedia's core policies. If you have concerns about the accuracy of the Cariso article, you should outline these at the associated talk page, Talk:Cariso. SuperMarioMan ( Talk ) 15:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
@Leona Brady Watson: (talk page stalker) I will add that your desire to preserve her legacy is irrelevant - Wikipedia is not a memorial site. Your mother will still have to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements to be considered worthy of inclusion. That will require that you cite multiple reliable, third-party sources.
I'll also suggest that you are not the best person to write the article, as you are so emotionally invested in it. It is considered a conflict of interest to write about people with whom you have/had a close personal relationship. It will impair your ability to write an article that meets the requirements of being plainly factual and dispassionate. Please consult Wikipedia's plain and simple conflict of interest guide before going any further. --Drm310 (talk) 16:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

This is not a problem because her works are in the Library of Congress and All over the US Virgin Island, She has Many award including award from the Smithsonian and Books to name a few.. Her legacy is important TO ME AS LEONA BRADY WATSON'S (HER)DAUGHTER AND THE FACT AND THE TRUTH IS RELEVENT FOR WIKIPEDIA. IS IT NOT? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leona Brady Watson (talkcontribs) 16:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

@Leona Brady Watson: There shouldn't be a problem if you can provide sources. Printed sources like books, magazines and newspapers are acceptable as well as online sources.
If you really still want to write it yourself, then I would recommend you try the Articles for Creation process. That allows you to create a draft article that is at less risk of deletion. You can also get feedback from other uninvolved editors before the article is published to the main article space. --Drm310 (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you so much. I will follow your advice and have someone else (that I trust)who is a writer, assist in writing. Leona Brady Watson (talk) 18:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Gail Chiang.

The guy who created the page Anirban Sen Choudhury[edit]

Okay figure I send this to you since you deleted it-the guy who created Anirban Sen Choudhury keeps on editing his talk page with non webhost violations of his info-he already deleted the warning he was sent earlier also. Wgolf (talk) 20:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

After re-creating that page twice after I deleted it they have been blocked indefinitely by Nthep. SuperMarioMan ( Talk ) 21:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

"Edmond de Rothschild Foundations": 26 April 2016[edit]

Dear SuperMarioMan,

I just wanted to apologize for the Edmond_de_Rothschild_Foundations page you deleted, as its style was indeed not respecting the Wikipedia guidelines. As this operation was not focused on advertising, but rather on completing the Wikipedia pages on the Rothschild family, I'll submit a most appropriate version of this article in a few weeks.

I will make all the efforts to respect the Wikipedia guidelines, and will stay available if you want to make any inquiry about the article.

Best Regards,

Youzn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youzn (talkcontribs) 14:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


Why did you delete the page "Ira Tiffen"? It had everything needed, and now I can't get the format back. Please respond on my own talk page. Adotchar (talk) 23:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

A page on the new page feed that is the same page as a redirect[edit]

So I found Mark D. Boughton which basically is the same as Mark Boughton, not sure what to say or how to mark this to be honest. Wgolf (talk) 22:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

@Wgolf: As there is nothing in the stub that couldn't be included in the town article, and the title is a plausible search term, I would be inclined to redirect as before. SuperMarioMan ( Talk ) 22:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Maybe someone should change that I guess then. I wasn't sure what to say really. Wgolf (talk) 22:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

The Page Lianta[edit]

hi SuperMarioMan,this page was my first to make,and i were very exiting. Lianta is a movie,and i made only the site for info, not focused on advertising.I want to be a part of the Wikipedia family.I respect Wikipedia and their guidelines.I hope you can make it appeared once again and forgive my failure attempt. Can you respond on my own talk page Best regards Tinimise (talk) 19:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

@Tinimise: I've emailed you a copy of the deleted text. Please remove promotional language such as "Lianta is a very mystic and psychological movie." and "You can see the movie before anyone else,the unofficial exclusive world premier. If you answer the riddle of Lianta.", include references to reliable sources, and then think about re-submitting the article. Please do not simply re-post it as is, or it will just be deleted again. SuperMarioManTalk 01:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Mavi Isibor[edit]

Hello, Please let me know why you deleted my page for unambiguous advertising. Seeing that it was about a notable person and her work in various fields and nothing implied that she be contacted. Especially since a good number of people she has mentored have pages on wikipedia and she has impacted multitudes more. I would appreciate it if you could reply on my talk page. Also I had done alot of work on it between the time it was put up for sppedy deletion and when you actually deleted it. I also put on the talk page that I was still improving it. Thank you.. The page is — Preceding unsigned comment added by UkiDare (talkcontribs) 22:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

  • @UkiDare: The article included descriptions such as:
    • "Mavi Sokia Isibor is the Etiquette ICON." (according to whom?)
    • "She is presently at the forefront of a professionalism revolution in Kenya ..." (according to whom?)
    • "Asides her passion in driving excellence in the corporate world ..." ("passion" according to whom?)
    • "Distinguished for her zeal and a humane heart ..." (according to whom?)
There were many other examples; hence why the page was speedy-deleted as being unambiguously promotional. SuperMarioMan ( Talk ) 00:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
@SuperMarioMan: Okay, I understand better now. However there are various sources for those things including humanitarian awards, the institute of Directors in Kenya, e.t.c I believe if I reword those lines and add the sources that will be fine? I was still adding a lot of sources however I decided to pause and be sure I was going in the right direction but the page got deleted. I would appreciate your help in letting me know how to access the deleted page and edited it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UkiDare (talkcontribs)
@UkiDare: I'm not willing to restore the page, but if you specify an email address in your user preferences I will be able to send a copy of the deleted text for you to work on. SuperMarioManTalk 01:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
@SuperMarioMan: Go ahead and email it — Preceding unsigned comment added by UkiDare (talkcontribs)[edit]

Block user: for vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:8DB8:C6E6:5396:67C7 (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

I don't see any recent vandalism from that IP. SuperMarioManTalk 21:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of page[edit]

You recently deleted the DataFirst page due to G11. Please note that it is not our intention to advertise. We are a research unit at the University of Cape Town, South Africa providing free data to researchers. We are the only online data portal available in Southern Africa. If the wording of page appears as advertising we will rewrite our content. For more information about us please have a look at We work closely with the ICPSR and the UK Data Archive. We are requesting that the page be undeleted. Asiljeur (talk) 07:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

You assert that your article was not intended as an advertisement, yet it was written entirely in the first person ("we") and was dominated by your organisation's mission statement – neither of which is in keeping with the style of a neutrally-written encyclopaedia. As you have indicated that your account is being used by more than one person, I have blocked it in accordance with WP:ROLE and WP:NOSHARE. SuperMarioManTalk 22:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


After all of these years he still keeps trying. Can you imagine if they put some of that stubbornness and tenacity to good use instead of disruption? What a waste! --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ponyo: I know – I used to keep a record of all the IP addresses used but gave up after it passed 300 entries. Sometimes, I wish that the project would just do away with descent categories... (By the way, that particular IP address is now blocked for a week.) SuperMarioManTalk 23:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)