User talk:Surtsicna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello, Surtsicna, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 17:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Izador Papo Article[edit]

I'm a family member of him. He was just married to Asya

You have been reported for revert violation[edit]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox peerage title[edit]

Template:Infobox peerage title has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox family. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

References[edit]

Hi. I think someone has messed up with the format of inline citations, because when I look at the articles I see all these red parameters hanging around. Do you have any idea who it might be? Keivan.fTalk 14:25, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Keivan.f! The parameter |deadurl= is the problem but I cannot find where that was discussed or why it is now "deprecated". I also do not know which parameter, if any, should be used to replace it. Surtsicna (talk) 15:11, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Ah, take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Is there a semi-automated tool that could fix these annoying "Cite Web" errors?. Surtsicna (talk) 15:20, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

DS Alert BLP[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svgThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

DS alert climate change[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svgThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

FOC[edit]

Greetings, at the article talk page, the other user is welcome to demonstrate neutrality problems. Casting aspersions about page ownership is improper. The way to do that is to exhaust dispute resolution options (which haven't really been attempted) and then, if there is evidence of ownership problems, complain to ANI or AE after marshalling evidence. RS-backed fierce debate leads to great articles. Table pounding and attacking motives of other eds, not so much NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

"Imperial feminism" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Imperial feminism. Since you had some involvement with the Imperial feminism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

A quick note[edit]

You ought to know that removing WP:BLUESKY information from parameters only after I have reverted previous (and recent) changes to those parameters looks very bad, and is especially ironic since I was accused of "stalking" you for reverting your changes at Cardinal Mazarin on entirely reasonable grounds. And yes, being baptised in a denomination would taken by any reasonable person, or any person without an axe to grind, to confirm their membership of that Church (that is how baptism is understood in nearly every confessional group, unless it is explicitly renounced). Her being a member of the House of Bernadotte is sufficient to establish the relevance of her religious confession. Endymion.12 (talk) 00:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

I had over 50 edits on Princess Sofia, Duchess of Värmland before today, going back to 2013, and I was active on the talk page as well, showing that I have had an interest in the article for years. You had 0 edits on Cardinal Mazarin before you reverted my edits. So no, I do not see how that looks bad on my part. No reasonable person would argue that undergoing a ritual as an infant determines one's religious convictions in adulthood. If Sofia's religious views are relevant and obvious, you will have no trouble finding a source that discusses them. Please also see Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_126#RfC:_Religion_in_biographical_infoboxes. Surtsicna (talk) 00:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
And yet you chose not to intervene when another user made some equally "irrelevant" changes to the field in the last few days. The field isn't concerned with religious convictions but with membership of a church. Endymion.12 (talk) 11:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Yes, that's when I chose to intervene, and my intervention was not a reversion of your edit. The field is for the "subject's religion(s)" which "may be listed ... if relevant, sourced and uncontroversial". Sofia is known for being a glamour-model-turned-princess, not for being particularly religious. Wikipedia should not label people as members of a religious organization just because they underwent a ritual as infants. That's a gross violation of WP:BLP. Surtsicna (talk) 11:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Shuping Wang[edit]

Ambox current red.svgOn 27 September 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Shuping Wang, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

SpencerT•C 12:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

New message from Bharatiya29[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Surtsicna. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure.
Message added 11:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Bharatiya29 11:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Shuping Wang[edit]

Hey- I would like to understand your perspective on this edit ([1]). Why remove the surname header? You say "This only works when the name is written in Chinese order.", but I was under the impression that this was a useful header no matter what order a name is in. Some Americans are probably dimly aware that Chinese surnames come first, and they may confuse themselves into thing Shuping could be a surname. Are you adding "Wang Shuping" as a pinyin form of the Chinese characters to clarify the way the name would be read aloud in Mandarin? Thanks. Geographyinitiative (talk) 07:22, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi! Yes, the header strikes me as superfluous when the name order is already Western, and I thought that the pinyin form would do a better job showing that in Chinese, the order is reversed. Do you think otherwise? Surtsicna (talk) 11:20, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Request for comment on styles in articles of non-reigning royals[edit]

Hello, Surtsicna. I would like to hear your opinion on the creation and enforcement of a standard and definite guideline for the styles of biographical articles of non-reigning royals and pretenders going forward. Please refer to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility#Non-reigning Royals, Pretenders, Wikipedia Guidelines/Styles, & Consensus for further discussion. 70.95.44.93 (talk) 20:21, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)