User talk:Sv1xv

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TUSC token 1732e7811c2ab135ed0a40ba279f599b[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Archived discussions[edit]


SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.


August 2020: Just another Wiki-enemy[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Nigel Ish. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Grumman Gulfstream I that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nigel Ish (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My comment was not meant to be civil, beacause the revent by BillCat was unreasonable. The whereabouts of the Greek "Gulfstream I" were already reasonably documented in the article by the inclusion of a photo of this plane at the museum. Unfortunately there are people who use the rules of WP against any common sense. Unfortunately Wikipedia has gradually evolved in the place to make new enemies. SV1XV (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Civility is not optional - attacking other editors in edit summaries doesn't help anyone, and merely increases the chance that someone will continue to revert you or take admin action. Sourcing is also not something that is optional - if someone removes something that is not sourced then the solution is simply to provide a source, not attacking people for making a perfectly reasonable edit. Photos do not count as Reliable Sources so just because there is a photo claiming to show an aircraft at a cerain museum doesn't mean we can say so. There is also the point as to whether it is appropriate to talk about aircraft being preserved in museums in an operators section.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You know, civility must work both ways. I still regard his revert as malicious, even if you claim that he follows the rules, He had solid indication that it was not a bogus edit, If he wanted to be civil, hw could have tagged my edit with {{facts}} as it was not an extraordinary claim. SV1XV (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]