User talk:T.seppelt

Alias-Challenge and Library of Congress Authorities

I don't know the best current location for a notice such as this, to people who work on Alias-Challenge (for English-language writers mainly).

Library of Congress Authorities reports "Variant(s)" forms of an authorized contributor name such as Eleanor Farjeon. Most of those are not similarly authorized. For some alternative names it also states such as this for Eleanor Farjeon LCCN n50-009191:

• See also[:] Tomfool, 1881-1965

Browse this term in LC Authorities [linked]

This display usually means that "Tomfool" is also authorized, with its own LCCN and page at Library of Congress Authorities--as for Tomfool, click-thru shows. The library has not catalogued any books published as by Tomfool (written/illustrated/edited/etc).

LCCN for the authorized variant name (here nr92037038) generally does not appear in the Wikidata field LCAuth--as it now does not appear at Wikidata:Eleanor Farjeon.

(I have not "decided" the Alias-Challenge for Eleanor Farjeon "Tomfool".) --P64 (talk) 22:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

"Please stop adding persondata" yet edit was in 2010

Hi, on my talk page your bot left a message telling me to "Please stop adding persondata" and linking to the edit that added it, yet the edit was in 2010. If you are able to filter to the edit that added persondata, perhaps you should also filter to only edits that have added persondata since it was deprecated? Rjwilmsi 07:35, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Persondata delete bot making wrong assumption.

I did not add persondata, I only added a link to a Forbes articles. So it seems this bot is making wrong assumptions about who or what is doing the edit sometimes. I have no idea how to invoke persondata. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidBlackwell (talk • contribs) 19:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

References

The article is based on two different sources. How many more sources may be needed to eliminate the ugly tags?. I personally think that the external links decisively collaborate on the authentication of personal information, and it is a little too much to ask for more information. I have seen articles accepted with much less information than this one, and I am very curious about why applying such an utterly harsh standard to this one. I sincerely appreciate a response. --Ernesto53 (talk) 15:48, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Abu Eesa Niamatullah

Hello! I am notifying interested projects and editors that I've listed Abu Eesa Niamatullah for discussion at AfD, and you were listed on the revision history page.

I invite you to contribute to the discussion. Mujaddouda (talk) 23:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)