User talk:TEOS2011

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Walid Phares with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:51, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Walid Phares, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Walid Phares was changed by TEOS2011 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856827 on 2011-10-12T18:54:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Walid Phares with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Walid Phares with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Trusilver 19:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Walid Phares with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:09, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Walid Phares. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:21, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Alexf^(talk) 19:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I'm sure you're very upset right now; I locked the article to stop the edit war so that we-the-admins can figure out what's going on. It's a truism that articles are always locked in "the wrong version".

Please stay calm while we get this fixed. Okay? DS (talk) 19:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TEOS2011 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:44, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.