User talk:TJjeremiah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A page you started (Socialist Party of North Carolina) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Socialist Party of North Carolina, TJjeremiah!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time to create an article. We have many missing topics and many articles which need developing. At the moment, this article has no sources. It's unclear if the 'related' section contains links you're recommending, or links which were used to create this page. Sources should be inline, next to the fact they are verifying. It's also unclear from this article why the NC branch of the party are WP:NOTABLE, rather than a redirect to the parent article.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 07:10, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

I have added sources and cleaned up the page a little TJjeremiah (talk) 23:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Socialist Party of North Carolina for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Socialist Party of North Carolina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialist Party of North Carolina (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 10:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Model US Gov for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Model US Gov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model US Gov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:23, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Silver legion.png[edit]

Copyright-excl.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Silver legion.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Christian Democratic party.png[edit]

Copyright-excl.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Christian Democratic party.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello TJjeremiah, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CactusWriter (talk) 17:58, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Massachusetts Political Designations[edit]

I recently authored two new articles (Latino-Vote Party and World Citizens Party) on political designations in Massachusetts and you made links to both of them on a couple of lists, which I thank you for. However, two of your edits added both of the prior mentioned articles to the page List of political parties in the United States. Both of these articles are about political designations, not political parties. In Massachusetts, political designations and political parties are entirely separate entities, and only parties should be listed on that page. Thanks again for adding the links; I just wanted to make sure I informed you of this as I plan on writing more articles on political designations in the state and wish for this not to be an issue in the future.

Thanks! Cran32 (talk) 16:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:SocialistPartyofNorthCarolinaLogo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:SocialistPartyofNorthCarolinaLogo.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Royalist Party USA for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Royalist Party USA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royalist Party USA until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:09, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Unblock request[edit]

Orologio rosso.svg
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
TJjeremiah (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log)
ip address (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · address.html RBLs · address http · block user · block log)

Block message:

autoblock message


Decline reason:

Not enough information for me to lift an autoblock. I see no blocks directly affecting this account. The block message would be helpful. SQLQuery me! 03:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


I was blocked for using an open proxy, which I haven't done TJjeremiah (talk) 03:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Orologio blu.svg
This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TJjeremiah (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19925 was submitted on Dec 03, 2017 14:10:05. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 14:10, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, TJjeremiah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

See also additions[edit]

Hi. I see you are adding "See alsos" to various political articles. Please make sure to keep such additions relevant. All political parties have something in common, I suppose, but a slim and well-considered See also section is much more useful to the reader. I don't understand why you added Coffee Party USA and Tea Party movement to Indivisible movement, for example. Bishonen | talk 21:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC).

The things in common between them is their status as political movements that seek to protest within their political parties TJjeremiah (talk) 22:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Well, I think that's a weak reason, which does little for the reader. But I'll leave it to you. Bishonen | talk 22:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC).

Orologio blu.svg
This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TJjeremiah (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19979 was submitted on Dec 06, 2017 21:34:37. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 21:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)