User talk:Te og kaker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Te og kaker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 18:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Young Americans (album), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Also, please avoid making uncivil remarks at Wikipedia, as you did in this edit summary. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 18:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Six Teens (song)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article The Six Teens (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just another album track.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 16:43, 30 October 2013 (UTC) TheLongTone (talk) 16:43, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

"Just another album track"?! The Six Teens was released as a single, and it did chart in several countries, man!

License tagging for File:Little Willy.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Little Willy.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Little Willy (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poison (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

It's the American band. O.K., I will change the link now! :) Te og kaker (talk) 19:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CanadianLinuxUser. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Civil War (song), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 20:10, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

It's pretty obvious that you don't know a shit of what you're talking about anyway. Think a bit before you revert. Are you Jewish? Te og kaker (talk) 20:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Civil War (song) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:08, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

I know that I can be blocked if I vandalise! But the fact is that I DON'T do that!!! The song is a metal power ballad. If you haven't heard the song, you have no right to block users who have. Te og kaker (talk) 18:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wig Wam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In My Dreams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Josie and the Pussycats (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Josie and the Pussycats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Go and Ask Peggy for the Principal Thing may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Genre = [[Alternative Rock]], [[Britpop]]] |

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. :) Te og kaker (talk) 23:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Original Research added to Pop Rock template[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.107.252.227 (talk) 06:22, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Disco-rock[edit]

Hello Te og kaker,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Disco-rock for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Transformer (album), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to The Show Must Go On (Queen song), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

May 2014[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at The Man Who Sold the World (album), you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

OK, so what do you call psychedelic music? How is it not psychedelic? Te og kaker (talk) 17:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Foreplay/Long Time, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:43, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

The Calling music sound?[edit]

I see you edit the page of The Calling. We all got different opinions on things but you have to remember that I put a reliable source and the source states that, The Calling is largely filled with post-grunge rock. Also, you said that the song Unstoppable is the only pure post-grunge song in Camino Palmero. Which is not because pure post-grunge songs are in Adrienne, Thank You, and Nothing Changed. As for Two you stated that Two features no grunge influences at all, you are kind of wrong because even though Two is not as Post-grunge as Camino Palmero, it has a few of post-grunge influences such as One By One. So I am going change your edit but if you have any questions ask me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeis1996 (talkcontribs) 18:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Vietnam War. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Darkness Shines (talk) 04:43, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Who Is Jo King?[edit]

Hi! I saw you restored Who Is Jo King? to an article (from a redirect) with an edit summary pointing out that "the article does exist". While this is true, as you're probably aware Wikipedia articles need more than simply to exist – they need to be notable. In this case the relevant notability guideline is WP:NALBUMS. I don't think the album is notable – I'm looking for things like news articles and reviews in reliable sources, but I can't find any – but if you think it is and know of any sources the article could use you should add them in. If you also can't find any then I'll return it to a redirect in a few days. Let me know if you have any questions. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 05:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

English?[edit]

Hi Te og kaker. Could you please learn at least elementary school level English? For example; the difference between "to" and "too". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.95.90 (talk) 16:18, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Nope. ;) I don't care very much about my English in edit summaries. Edit summaries have to be as short as possible, and that's more important than writing perfect English. Also, I often use my iPad and iPhone to edit Wikipedia, and iPads and iPhones have autocorrect programs who "correct" words they believe are wrong - and these autocorrect programs often "correct" words who are written correctly as well. I don't know were I wrote "to" instead of "too" or vice versa, but I guess that if I did, I was editing from iPhone or iPad.(By the way: this is the funniest comment that someone has ever posted on my talk page. Thank you very much!) :) Te og kaker (talk) 19:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I guess that you was thinking of this article. I can tell you why it says "try a little to much". That's a typo. No more advanced than that. --Te og kaker (talk) 19:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Wig-Wam Bam.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wig-Wam Bam.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:08, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Sweet Peppermint Twist.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sweet Peppermint Twist.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015[edit]

I reverted your recent edits to Roar (song). The genre you added is not mentioned in the review; AllMusic's sidebar is not considered a reliable source, as explained at WP:ALBUMS/SOURCE#Sources to avoid. Please do not reintroduce your changes to the article. Thank you. 115.164.220.149 (talk) 02:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your AIV report[edit]

AIV is to be used to report vandalism and spamming only. Please don't waste admins' time by misusing it. Some of the proper avenues you can use are listed here. --NeilN talk to me 14:16, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, adding your own opinion as if they were facts is vandalism, isn't it, @NeilN? Te og kaker (talk) 14:21, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
No. Please read WP:VANDTYPES. --NeilN talk to me 14:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Do you have any evidence of sockpuppetry? I'd love to see it. bobrayner (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
No, I just guessed so, because your edits remind me very much of ZiaLater, another right-wing, anti-Chávez vandal and edit warrior. I know several right-wingers in real life. Not one of them is decent. They simply don't respect any other opinion than their own. And they think that poor people are not worth anything. Te og kaker (talk) 20:40, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Dividing folk into virtuous allies and sinful enemies certainly has the virtue of simplicity, and removing the need for more nuanced understanding of people's positions; I'll grant you that. bobrayner (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2015 (UTC)