User talk:Techman224/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

RE:Reverted Vandalism

Thanks ;D Darth Panda (talk) 00:56, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

That vandal was really persistent, wasn't he? Bumped up my User Page Vandalized count from 5 to 10... Thanks again! Darth Panda (talk) 01:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Finally... Serves him right, and hopefully, he won't return... Darth Panda (talk) 01:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


True, but if we didn't have vandals what would I do with myself all day? :-) ... discospinster talk 01:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)



I reverted your edit to Police State by mistake. Sorry. Prince of Canada t | c 02:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Jared Nomak

You reverted a legitimate page blank at Jared Nomak. Please look at the page history before assuming that long-time editors are vandalizing articles. Wronkiew (talk) 22:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Protection

Yeah, I know. But I really don't mind them doing it. It inflates my stats ;-) J.delanoygabsadds 20:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Looks like he/she/it's targetting you now. If you get bored with it, just lemmeno. J.delanoygabsadds 20:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Someone already got him/her... J.delanoygabsadds 20:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, I semi-protected your talk page for 8 hours. J.delanoygabsadds 20:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
No problem. I like how you asked me at the same time I was already protecting your page. J.delanoygabsadds 20:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

OK, you have rollback now. You may want to read the stuff on WP:NAS/R and WP:ROLLBACK before you start. Cheers! J.delanoygabsadds 21:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

I just want to caution you to be careful when you use rollback. I was not aware of the warnings you received just a few days ago for inappropriate use of Twinkle. If I had seen those before, I never would have given you rollback. However, since the reversions you have made very recently have been good, I will not remove your access to rollback at this time. Even so, I will keep a close eye on your use of the tool. If you make a mistake, please revert yourself!!! If you make mistakes and do not self-revert, I will have to remove your rollback access,. and I really don't want to do that. J.delanoygabsadds 22:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my edits

Please pay attention to what i write. READ THIS ARTICLE. THIS IS A FICTIONAL ARTICLE for the following reasons: 1)The player is not mentions on Russian Premier League official website list of players 2)The player is not mentioned in the club's official list of players. 3).There are no sources whatsoever provided. 4).A google search provides about 8 results to a blog and a youtube video which happens to be made by the SAME PERSOn. 5).There is no cited info whatsoever.

First of all, you blanked the page, which is vandalism. That's not the way to delete a article. You need to speak to a admin about this. You can go here to request it to be deleted, and put up a template requesting it deleted, but please don't blank the page, it doesn't delete the article, and I don't want to waste time reverting vandalism every single time on one page. Besides, page blanking is against the rules and can get you blocked. Thanks. Techman224 (talk) 22:47, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
P.S Make sure you sign your talk page post with four "~"

Denied Account Creator

Hi. You declined my request for the account creation tool. The reason said that I don't have enough editing experience in Wikipedia. What do you mean by that? I don't have enough contributions? Thanks. Techman224 (talk) 21:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Partially that, partially that the vast majority of your edits are made using an automated tool, and partially as you have only really been active on Wikipedia since the start of the month. The account creation tool currently has 164 operators, so right now we don't especially need anyone extra. Thanks for your interest and feel free to reapply in a month or two. Stifle (talk) 08:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)