User talk:Teh Rote

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Uncyclopedia FA Nom[edit]

Raising the status of this article rewards Wikipedia vandals because it shows those who come from Uncyclopedia that their work, on Uncyclopedia and off, will lead to recognition on Wikipedia. My work as a vandal fighter will be ruined because this violates the spirit of WP:DENY, in that we are giving attention and recognition to these vandals. I did not launch an attack against Uncyclopedia editors in general, only those who vandalizes here. Unless you count yourself as a vandal here on Wikipedia (in that case, I will have no choice but to report you), I did not attack you. The example you quoted is an apples and oranges scenario, and I will not answer such a fallacious question.

I have stated my position, and I did not attack you. But you DID attack me, and engaged in uncivil behaviors, so...

Nuvola apps important.svg Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Nuvola apps important.svg Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.

And don't you even dare say I violated AGF. I have exhausted my GF already on those Uncyclopedia editors who vandalize Wikipedia.

Arbiteroftruth (talk) 08:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Warning[edit]

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 00:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


Your assertions that I have repeatedly nominated Uncyclopedia for deletion is absolutely baseless, in addition to being slanderous. I have nominated it only once. While I agree that that situation could have been handled perfectly, that incident alone does not mean I have nominated it many times. Check the AFD archives if you want to.

Secondly, your assertions that I believe every single Uncyclopedia editors are vandals are libelous. It was very clear I was referring to Uncyclopedia editors who vandalize Wikipedia. I reiterate my position that unless you consider yourself as a vandal here on Wikipedia, I did not attack you.

Finally, I have never, ever, said we should follow the spirit of WP:DENY completely. I follow it on a case-by-case basis, and this is a case where I believe we should follow it.

I hereby seriously warn you that if you continue to travel down this path of slander and lies, I will report you to the proper Wikipedia authorities.

Note[edit]

I am not sure exactly which comments there is a dispute over. I would encourage you and Arbiteroftruth to both step back and take a breath. I am going to leave Arbiteroftruth the same basic message encouraging him/her to take relax a little as well. Remember, be civil. KnightLago (talk) 01:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Luck, North Carolina[edit]

Luck, North Carolina is a real place. I was able to verify this at http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/ and http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/f?p=gnispq:3:::NO::P3_FID:1021305 --Eastmain (talk) 01:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

My Apology[edit]

The incident that occurred earlier today was unfortunate, and for that, I apologize. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 04:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

1809 in France‎[edit]

Hi, user IngerAlhao merged the data from that article into 1809, forgot to mention that. Cheers. Mion (talk) 15:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

It gets better, the merge was opposed on Talk:1809 and for that correct reverted, didn't see that before. Mion (talk) 15:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi Teh Rote - see below:

Opposed to merging all Years by Country into Year[edit]

Hi BozMo - no objection to making each year consistent (as per 1850), but do not see why Years by County have to be merged into the year (eg 1809 in France) and the many hundreds of other years by country articles. A lot of us have spent substantial time ensuring we have Years by country articles (eg Ireland is very comprehensive) and these articles form a vital part of History by country.

Support 1850 format, but not merging of Years by country articles which stand very much in their own right. Ardfern (talk) 14:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

1809[edit]

Have had to restore 1809 in France as it had been merged befiore any discussion completed. If this goes on many hundreds of articles will be lost that are part of History by country. Ardfern (talk) 15:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Mion - You cannot pull down people's articles without any discussion - this is not what Wikipedia is about. This article is part of a series and should not be destroyed. Ardfern (talk) 15:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Jaja ardfern, i admit my mistake, the situation has been corrected, 1809 is also setback to 3 mar. Mion (talk) 15:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

GA review[edit]

I reviewed Astrobiology, but did not feel it met the GA criteria. Please contact me with any questions or comments.Mjamja (talk) 19:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Featured portals[edit]

Amusing, certainly, but this is a Wikipedia-space page, not really appropriate for WP:FPOC discussion. Cirt (talk) 20:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

No prob. Cirt (talk) 20:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Thanks! These are never too late. KnightLago (talk) 23:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

rhymes[edit]

My, what a nasty attitude you have. I don't see you making any contributions. I suggest that if you think we should list every one of the tens of thousands of rhymeless words, you should discuss it on the talk page. I don't see what purpose it would serve, nor how you would generate it such a list. Meanwhile we need some way to control the length of the article, and IMO excluding compound words is a good place to start. (After all, it's easy enough to create nonce words that rhyme with them, which is not the case for the other words on the list.) kwami (talk) 00:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Checking undo work[edit]

Please be more careful in not undoing the removal of multiple instances of vandalism, as in the article Northwood High School (North Carolina), a change which has been reverted. I assume this was a mistake. -- Michael Devore (talk) 00:27, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

V Tech Massacre review[edit]

I have reverted your addition to Wikipedia:Article alerts/News. Items must be of interest to more than just a few wikiprojects, per the first bullet of Wikipedia talk:Article alerts/News. Feel free to contact individual WikiProjects however. If they are already subscribed to the Article Alerts, and have tagged Talk:Virginia Tech Massacre with their banners, they will be notified through the daily reports. Thanks. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 15:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:RUN[edit]

You have made valuable contributions to Wikiproject Running in the past, and we would appreciate you re-engaging. We've made a number of improvements lately including adopting assessment and importance parameters on the template that we place on the talk page of our articles. The project page has been updated to automatically chart the number of articles that have been assessed, and to use bots to provide us with alerts regarding project articles. We are also experimenting with bots that tag articles in project-related categories. However, bots can never replace skilled editors such as you. Please check in and lend a hand. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 18:59, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikipedia has a userbox available for you, Teh Rote[edit]

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/userbox/UserWikiProjectWikipedia}}

Pandelver (talk) 15:19, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lonelyplanetpbcover1.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Lonelyplanetpbcover1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Watley Review[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article The Watley Review has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Lack of third party RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed[edit]

03:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)