User talk:Tennosenna

Welcome!

Hello, Tennosenna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

1bandsaw (talk) 21:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monarchs with "I" after their name[edit]

Certainly for British monarchs, and possibly universally, kings and queens are not allocated a I after their name until a II comes along, at which point they're allocated it retrospectively. Hence Queen Victoria and King John etc. Queen Elizabeth I was known as plain old Queen Elizabeth until King George VI died. --Dweller (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox portraits[edit]

Please avoid large portraits in infoboxes - they should allow the face to be seen as well as possible. The Van Dyck equestrian portrait of Charles V, painted some 70 years after his death, is not "famous". I expect you were thinking of the Titian. Johnbod (talk) 01:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Carlos I of Portugal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'the Martyr'''); {{lang-pt|o Diplomata ''and'' o Martirizado}}; 28 September 1863 – 1 February 1908) was the [[King of Portugal|King of Portugal and the Algarves]]. He was the first Portuguese king

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Whig Party and copyright[edit]

This edit introduced a wall of text taken, word for word, from portions of the party's platform page. This is an unequivocal, direct violation of our copyright violation policy. Do not repeat this action. You can certainly add reliably sourced (preferably to a secondary source) content regarding the platform. But, using this material is not permissible. Further, slightly modifying it does not help as it would constitute derivative work. If you have questions about this, please ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 23:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring notice[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Modern Whig Party. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whig Party[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

"Modern Whig Party and copyright This edit introduced a wall of text taken, word for word, from portions of the party's platform page. This is an unequivocal, direct violation of our copyright violation policy. Do not repeat this action. You can certainly add reliably sourced (preferably to a secondary source) content regarding the platform. But, using this material is not permissible. Further, slightly modifying it does not help as it would constitute derivative work. If you have questions about this, please ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 23:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)"

I wasn't aware that I violated any copyrights, as I received permission from the website owner and correctly cited the source of the information. If I had known such, I would never have acted in such a way or published the text as it was.

I will not, however, tolerate how I have been treated by the editor in question who has repeatedly overturned my contributions to the page for reasons that have nothing to do with the copyright. He has accused me of contributing propaganda and advertisment and using Wikipedia as a medium to allegedly advance my political goals.

Tennosenna (talk) 00:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that this has happened to you. Wikipedia has very strict rules about copyright and even close paraphrasing. Since Wikipedia text is under a CC BY-SA 3.0 license, anything pasted here also has to come from similarly licensed sources or public domain texts, like pre-1923 editions of Encyclopedia Britannica. Simply getting permission from the site owner is not enough. If you want to talk to the user in question directly, please feel free to go to their talk page. Rotideypoc41352 (talk) 00:57, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DGG ( talk ) 04:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing none of the such. The fact that you would accuse me of it is insulting and flatly wrong. The issue is settled and you do not need need to intervene. I have no intention of continuing the discussion and don't want anything to do with it anymore. Thank you.

Fix on a page[edit]

Hi User:Tennosenna, can you add some info to Maiorana article please, and the links might have to be removed, I don't want to make mistakes on article, but I'm fair sure you can help, thanks if you can.--Theo Mandela (talk) 22:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC) [reply]