User talk:TheDoctorWho

Home Talk (Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) WikiCup Submissions Sandbox My CSD Log

Your GA nomination of Rogue (Doctor Who)

The article Rogue (Doctor Who) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rogue (Doctor Who) for comments about the article, and Talk:Rogue (Doctor Who)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DoctorWhoFan91 -- DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 05:21, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of List of Doctor Who Christmas and New Year's specials

Congratulations, TheDoctorWho! The list you nominated, List of Doctor Who Christmas and New Year's specials, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 7 good articles, and 13 did you know nominations;
• Arconning (submissions) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews;
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on Genghis Khan and 2 good articles; and
• BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Susanna Hoffs, 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles.

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Private Practice season 1

Hello again. Sorry for the random message. I hope you are doing well. I wanted to let you know that I am planning on rewriting the Private Practice season 1 article. A couple of years ago, we talked about how it is really more of an article than a list. I just wanted to double-check with you to make sure that it was okay that I was going to rework the article. In one of your edit summaries (here), you said that you considered making this one of your projects so I wanted to check in you so I did not want to over-step or anything like that. Aoba47 (talk) 23:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@Aoba47: Feel free to reach out anytime! I'm doing pretty well (minus the COVID), I hope you're well, too! As expected, I've gotten sidetracked with several other projects and I haven't made it back around to that article. That said, I probably won't have the time in the foreseeable future to take it on a solo-project, so feel free to take it on yourself! If you need any help on a specific area I may be able to spend a bit of time on a section or two, just let me know and I'll see what I can do, but I'll let you take the overall lead. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! You can always reach out to me anytime as well. I hope that you feel better soon. I had COVID a few years ago and it was pretty rough. Obviously, your health should take priority over anything else. I will definitely let you know if I need any help with anything. I plan on taking my time with this project as I am trying to be better with balancing Wikipedia with other things in my life. I have mostly just been looking through and formatting citations for now. I honestly cannot believe that I forgot to mention the 2007–08 Writers Guild of America strike in the article as it did have a big impact on the season, but I have been trying to not be as hard on myself. Again, I hope that you feel better soon. Aoba47 (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for the double reply. I just wanted to let you know that I decided to not rewrite Private Practice season 1. Even though it seemed like a good idea at the time, I really did not enjoy the process and had many false starts with it. I believe that my primary reason for wanting to revisit it was that I felt a bit ashamed of my work there and I felt more obligated to improve it rather than actually enjoying it (and I am aware that is not a good mindset to have in general). I would not have any issue with Private Practice season 1 being brought through the WP:FLRC process, and I do find the recent discussion on these FLs for television seasons to be interesting. Anyway, apologies again for the long message. Just wanted to explain this since I brought it up to you in the first place. Hope you are feeling better! Aoba47 (talk) 01:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Apologies for the late reply. I am feeling much better, thank you. You definitely shouldn't be ashamed of it, it's a very well-written article! I may offer to oversee this one at GA given the way the discussion you mentioned has been going. As for FA, I hope to get it there someday, but it likely won't be in the immediate or even semi-distant future. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

I am glad that you are feeling better. That is really the most important thing. There is no need to apologize. Thank you for the kind words. I just get too stuck in my own head about it rather than being proud of my past work. I have citations for the article in my sandbox history so let me know at anytime if that would be helpful. I did not go through Newspapers.com as I did not have access to it at the time, but I do have online sources. No pressure of course as I do not have any plans on working on it either. Just out of curiosity, what are projects are you thinking of working on for the future? Aoba47 (talk) 22:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

I definitely understand where you're coming from. I've definitely struggled with the same thing before. Things that I've considered to be good content five years ago seems really crappy compared to the pages I've produced more recently.

As for my my current plans, I'm trying not to do much thinking since it seems like I am already in the middle of so many projects 😅. Those are currently spread across a few areas, but just to name my primary ones that I'm actively working on. Doctor Who specials (2022), Doctor Who series 14, and their related episode articles are both on track to all be good topics. Individually, I'm hoping to also get the nine Line of Duty articles to a GT and have also been meaning to expand Cobra Kai season 6 and get it to GA status. The only thing that I'll admit to thinking about was eventually pursuing FA for either Line of Duty or Tulsa King, but that process is stressful so I'm not quite sure. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the response. I would say that I am glad that I am not the only one who has felt this way, but I am sorry that it has happened to you as well. It is a weird feeling for sure. Best of luck with the projects! The FAC process can be quite stressful so I completely understand that. Whenever I do become more active on Wikipedia, I would be more than happy to help out if/when possible. Aoba47 (talk) 17:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

The Christmas Invasion

I apologize for my inactivity in regards to improving that article, as I've had a lot hit me irl and what time I've been spending on Wikipedia has been dedicated to clearing up a few things in other WikiProjects I'm associated with. I'm really sorry about the delays; I'll try to get on the article soon. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 04:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

No worries, I've had a few IRL commitments that have kept me from progressing on the set that I've been working on. Some of these bigger projects take time, that's why I'm glad that there's multiple of us tackling this one. I'm hoping to get a start on Revolution in the next week or so. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Administrator changes

Pppery

Interface administrator changes

Pppery

Oversighter changes

Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

• Courcelles
• GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
• Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
• The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.

Miscellaneous

• Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

• News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked

• In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?

• Recent research: Simulated Wikipedia seen as less credible than ChatGPT and Alexa in experiment

• News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election

• Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024

• Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year

• Traffic report: After the gold rush

• Humour: Local man halfway through rude reply no longer able to recall why he hates other editor

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dot and Bubble

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dot and Bubble you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 07:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dot and Bubble

The article Dot and Bubble you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dot and Bubble and Talk:Dot and Bubble/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 08:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dot and Bubble

The article Dot and Bubble you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dot and Bubble for comments about the article, and Talk:Dot and Bubble/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eve of the Daleks

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eve of the Daleks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 23:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

WIkiProject Doctor Who: September 2024 Newsletter

The Space-Time Telegraph Volume II, Issue II — September 2024 Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who You like Doctor Who? What's his name then? Welcome Hello and welcome to the second issue of the new newsletter! Following the success of the first newsletter we are back to write more stuff. Articles for deletion Several articles have been nominated for deletion, such as Time War (Doctor Who), and several articles have been deleted, or merged or redirected, especially those relating to books, due to lack of WP:SIGCOV and WP:NBOOK. Editors can always help either by participating in the deletion discussions (which are noted on the project page), adding to such articles, or bringing attention to other such articles through AfD or the WikiProject talk page, to aid in clean-up. Notice of Draft Articles A new Doctor Who spin-off was announced at the 2024 San Diego Comic-Con, called The War Between the Land and the Sea, and will feature old and new Whoniverse characters working for UNIT as they battle the Sea Devils. The main space article currently redirects to Whoniverse, but collaboration is currently underway in a draft article. As filming on this miniseries has recently begun, its relocation to the mains space will presumably take place soon per the recommendations laid out at WP:NTV. There is also a draft article in progress for the upcoming 2024 Christmas special. While this article won't be moved until the episode airs, any new contributions are welcome. Doctor Who News A small number of editors have recently raised questions regarding the reliability of Doctor Who News. This website is particularly used for information regarding viewing figures and the Appreciation Index of most episodes as well as some news information. If there is a better source for any information supported by this website, it should be replaced in good faith. A full consensus on whether or not to remove the information that can't be supported by a different source has not yet been reached. Any editor who has opinions on this matter should contribute to the discussion on the WikiProject talk page. Continued Progress Towards Good/Featured Content There has been lots of progress made towards recognized articles in the last two months, related to such diverse categories as series, specials, lists and episodes A sub-page has also been added to the WikiProject, to list any possible goals we can aim towards. Proposals Regarding the State of Fictional Elements Articles in the WikiProject Several proposals have been laid out regarding fictional elements in the WikiProject, which includes fictional characters, locations, and more. Due to a concerning quality state regarding the large majority of them, several methods of tackling them in order to improve these articles' quality for the future have been proposed. The primary three proposals are as follows: 1. A priority list should be made to determine what articles are most pressing and in need of improvement in the WikiProject overall. Focus would be put onto important subjects and articles in a state of dubious notability that would make them viable for deletion processes such as AfD. 2. A group of articles is selected for improvement, which are ones deemed most relevant to the WikiProject for the future. Any lesser important subjects can be sidelined and worked on as editors see fit. 3. A long term goal is made to improve all elements. This will come at the caveat of taking significantly longer and requiring more heavy participation than the above two proposals, but would guarantee a slow and steady way to solve the issue. If any editors are interested in chiming into the conversation and sharing their piece on how this should be handled, or if any editors wish to help with this proposal and improve fictional elements articles, then feel free to share thoughts at the discussion's section on the article's talk page. Contributors TheDoctorWho (talk) Pokelego999 (talk) Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) "I'm not appalled by it" - The New New York Times If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter or have any feedback, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above. If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Block account from messaging me

How do I block an account from attempting to contact me on this site? Booklover6988 (talk) 00:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

• In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"

• Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus

• Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics

• Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing

• News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?

• Gallery: Are Luddaites defending the English Wikipedia?

• Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors

• Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eve of the Daleks

The article Eve of the Daleks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eve of the Daleks for comments about the article, and Talk:Eve of the Daleks/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 01:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

• Asilvering
• Significa liberdade

• Good Olfactory
• Hesperian
• I JethroBT
• TommyBoy
• Woody

CheckUser changes

• Barkeep49
• Izno

• Doug Weller
• Spicy

Guideline and policy news

• Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
• Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
• An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
• Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).

Miscellaneous

• If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who § Disruptive editing on The Doctor and The Fugitive Doctor

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who § Disruptive editing on The Doctor and The Fugitive Doctor. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 02:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate 444, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inner Dispersal Loop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)